why do you think this was? i have only dyno'd my evo on a dj, so my evo dyno experience is limited, however the time it took for me to go from 2,500-7,500 revs took 5.966 secs, while my street tune took 6.154 secs....not huge in difference & the rpm overlays look fairly similar.....my afr's were as my street tune....

i am not doubting, i am just looking for some insight for when i go to a mustang-sally......dyno......i like that song....

especially after i have had my share to drink too looking @ all those nasty girls dancing &

Thanks & Have a wonderful thanksgiving

 

Good GOD!
Thats unreal Dave. You are always pushing the envelope.
Let some of us catch up.

Congrats, I cant wait to see the car run.

 

Amazing!Great work!

 

Dang I'd love to just drive that car. Can't wait to get mine up there!!!

 

Great Job Dave!

-Em

 

It's due to a difference in the loading, just as a street pull for a given rpm range in 1st gear differs from the same range in 4th. As one applies the air drag and such of a real world, high-speed track pull to a static mass dyno roller (Dynojet), the difference becomes significant.

 

And that's some sweet ****!!!! Congrats Dave!!! Kick ***!!!

 

dave, how do you like the 35hta compared to the 67p trim?? depending on next years rule book im wondering if i should give up the 67p for the HTA maybe.. i was told by a friend of ours that the 35r will 1/8th mile quicker and faster probably.. if the 35r can make 700whp it may be better all around..

 

David, I know this is absolutely an idiots question to ask, as its almost obvious the answer....

HOWEVER....what type of fuel, specifically are you using? Brand/Octane etc....and methanol injection, yes, no? How much, and jet sizes?

Just curious, is all.

Keep up the amazing work......its astounding.

 

Simply amazing.

 

my guess is david would have conducted his dyno compare using the same gear, as i did with my pull. over the course of roughly 6 seconds, there was only a 0.188 second difference....about a car & a half in a 1/4 mile...not that big of a deal IMO.

then if this is the case, then my real world tuning afr's would have been vastly different than my dj afr's, which was the case

i just dont understand why the ~10% difference in fueling due to the dyno if both runs were conducted in the same gear......that would require a huge ambient condition change between the 2 runs....

besides, i would have expected a higher dj whp number to boot, if db's car made 661 on his dyno to the 70? on the dj

 

That its absolutely amazing!

 

FP-Green is a 20g isn't it? anyways . . .

Nice numbers david and congrats. i'm definetly lookin into gettin this turbo!

 

[quote=feldguy;4980477]David, I know this is absolutely an idiots question to ask, as its almost obvious the answer....

HOWEVER....what type of fuel, specifically are you using? Brand/Octane etc....and methanol injection, yes, no? How much, and jet sizes?
quote]

I know DB uses VP import and does not use Meth.


The disparity in the Mustang and Dynojet is confusing and the answer must be that it was somehow rich and not completely retuned to achieve maximum HP, otherwise the difference is only 5.5% between the Mustang and the Dynojet.

Just tryin to clear things up DB, please correct me if I am wrong. Great #'s and I am a huge supporter of the Buschur race ethic!!

 

Damn... that is sick.