Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

HTA35R-700whp/646ft lbs......Buschur RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #1  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
HTA35R-700whp/646ft lbs......Buschur RS

So, I was bored today. Waiting to see if the track is going to open or not this weekend to run the car one more time.

I called Switzer's down the road from us and asked if I could get on his Dynojet.

Trent and I went over to see what the car would do on his dyno.

First pull the car was rediculously rich. I have the car set up on our dyno and on the track to run 11.5:1 AFR's. The car was 10.4:1 on the Dynojet. Boost was also only 37-38 psi.

I didn't want to re-tune the car so I just turned the 02 feedback on throughout the entire RPM range and boost, set it at 11.5:1 and then turned the boost up.

With 40 psi of boost, AFR's at 11.4:1 we got some results.

With SAE correction on, which was 1.00 (no correction), smoothing on 3 the car made 700.47 whp and 646.46 ft lbs of torque.

Peak Hp was at 5700 rpm and peak torque was at 5600 rpm.

I thought the video camera was in the car, when I got there it was not..........pissed off no video.

Dyno chart we won't post until Monday. I have it here but Jarrod does the scanning and hosting of them and he was on vacation today.

For a reminder, on our dyno the car made 661 whp and 579 ft lbs of torque.

Not a huge difference this time in power but I spent no time getting the tune right on for the Dynojet either.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
So you can now only add 5.5 percent to come up with your dynojet numbers.... from now on.

On the upside, you still have a 700whp 35R'd evo. Good job!

Scorke
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #3  
duracell55's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: South Florida, USA
700 wow!

Congrats DB

150 + mph at the track for sure
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
typac69's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Thats sick David keep it up.... Cant wait to pick mine up soon from you guys
BUSCHUR ALL THE WAY
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #5  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
So, I was bored today. Waiting to see if the track is going to open or not this weekend to run the car one more time.

I called Switzer's down the road from us and asked if I could get on his Dynojet.

Trent and I went over to see what the car would do on his dyno.

First pull the car was rediculously rich. I have the car set up on our dyno and on the track to run 11.5:1 AFR's. The car was 10.4:1 on the Dynojet. Boost was also only 37-38 psi.

I didn't want to re-tune the car so I just turned the 02 feedback on throughout the entire RPM range and boost, set it at 11.5:1 and then turned the boost up.

With 40 psi of boost, AFR's at 11.4:1 we got some results.

With SAE correction on, which was 1.00 (no correction), smoothing on 3 the car made 700.47 whp and 646.46 ft lbs of torque.

Peak Hp was at 5700 rpm and peak torque was at 5600 rpm.

I thought the video camera was in the car, when I got there it was not..........pissed off no video.

Dyno chart we won't post until Monday. I have it here but Jarrod does the scanning and hosting of them and he was on vacation today.

For a reminder, on our dyno the car made 661 whp and 579 ft lbs of torque.

Not a huge difference this time in power but I spent no time getting the tune right on for the Dynojet either.
Very nice #s David but do you have a Dyno sheet? The TQ seems a little high for a 2.0
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #6  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
As long as I hold a time slip for 9.7 at 148 with a 35r I don't care about adding anything to my numbers..............

The last time my RS was on this particular dyno the numbers didn't increase a ton either, on the other hand on the same day our black car did go up 20%.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Yes, I have a dyno sheet. Superior engineering +superior tuning=high hp/torque
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:48 PM
  #8  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Yes, I have a dyno sheet. Superior engineering +superior tuning=high hp/torque
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #9  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Like I said, Jarrod has to scan the dyno sheet to post it and he was on vacation today.

Remember it made 661/579 on OUR dyno last week.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #10  
vwjeff's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas and HATING it
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Yes, I have a dyno sheet. Superior engineering +superior tuning=high hp/torque
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #11  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Like I said, Jarrod has to scan the dyno sheet to post it and he was on vacation today.

Remember it made 661/579 on OUR dyno last week.
Jarrod on vacation! Hes always complaining about you working him to death
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #12  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
I think it's been said before that this particular Dynojet was calibrated to read nearly the same as your Mustang. It seems that the recent thread about a Switzer tuned car mentioned that fact. There must be a real secret that DB's still hiding concerning the whp/wtq. The finger nails are the last to go. See you next Monday.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #13  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Congrats. 700whp on 35r is something to talk about.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #14  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 58
From: Birmingham, AL
AFAIK, Dynojets cannot be 'recalibrated' to read differently. The loading however is less on a Dynojet than it typically is with an eddy current dyno, and this can affect the disparity in the numbers.

Good numbers for a 35R, but I have a simple question: If the compressor wheel and housing are different (don't know particulars about the turbine side), just how much of this turbo is actually "35R"? It seems to me that it's about as much a "35R" as an FP Green is a "16G". . . ?

Lastly, the big torque figure is a product of reaching max boost pressure fairly early in the rpm range, coupled with things like stock-sized intake manifold, cam characteristics, etc.

Last edited by Ted B; Nov 21, 2007 at 07:22 PM.
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #15  
mudduck's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
I think the point here is that it spools SOONER than a standard GT35r, makes more power UNDER the curve, and makes more PEAK power -----> triple threat!


Quick Reply: HTA35R-700whp/646ft lbs......Buschur RS



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:56 AM.