Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Reflash, Green, 2 liters and 507 ft lbs/443 whp..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2007, 08:43 PM
  #301  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Yes, I like Al's suggestion to you about going to something like the 3" or 3.5" GM MAF in a case like yours. That combined with a VSR intake should unlock a few more MPH.

But, it would be just an interim solution, since you'll eventually be going to the HTA 35R won't you? In which case you'll be wanting a standalone anyway. Good Luck
Old Dec 17, 2007, 08:46 PM
  #302  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
9sec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah, anything we do at this point isn't going to reap much gain, I'm afraid. The turbo just can't flow much more. Now, if FP would come up with a Little bit bigger turbo, I'd love to be the tester, hint, hint,...Robert, are you listening?
Old Dec 17, 2007, 09:06 PM
  #303  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FP Evo RED ?

Me and George of ICS were talking about that today
Old Dec 17, 2007, 09:22 PM
  #304  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
evilempire76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish they would build a larger bolt on turbo. That's one thing I liked about my STI. There are a ton stock location bolt on turbos to choose from compared to what we have.
Old Dec 17, 2007, 10:18 PM
  #305  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Most likely in the case of the Green, the restrictiveness of the MAF was not taken into account when calculating mass air flow through the compressor. It would have required testing the MAF to arrive at an intake restriction value.

Last edited by sparky; Dec 17, 2007 at 10:39 PM.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 05:27 AM
  #306  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
9sec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sparky, that settles it! We need another turbo. Let's design one that's a direct bolt on and we can make 550 whp on the Mustang Dyno.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 05:44 AM
  #307  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 9sec9
Sparky, without question. We're flowing as much as as the MAF can flow under wot. If we could gain anything, it's just going to be in the minor dips. If you think about it, David hit the 449 mark (can't remember exactly from dynosheet) and we hit 445. Just don't think the turbo will flow much more, let alone the maf. Since the turbo is 47lbs wheel, that doesn't leave much for loss to the wheels if you calculate it at 10.5 hp per lb of air. No doubt the maf restriction is already there on the green.
you haven't hit the limitation of the stock MAS...there's people making more than that on the stocker.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:06 AM
  #308  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Yes, absolutely NO doubt on a well equipped GT35r car the power gains from switching to the AEM EMS, Power FC or any other stand alone over the stock computer is going to reap HUGE gains in horsepower. I was speaking ONLY of Tom's car since that is the topic of this thread.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:07 AM
  #309  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Be patient................something bigger is coming..........someday.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:14 AM
  #310  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
9sec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
removed

Last edited by 9sec9; Mar 23, 2008 at 02:21 PM.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:16 AM
  #311  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
9sec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Damnnn it DB, I don't want to be patient! I want something NOW (or at least soon ) I'll be a test bed for something new. Me, me, oooohh, oooooooh, choose me!
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:23 AM
  #312  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Pushing the stock ECU... do we think that the limitation is the MAF sensor (airflow restriction and/or granularity at high airflow) or the presently non-configurable knock control pulling timing too early?
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:33 AM
  #313  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
9sec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
removed

Last edited by 9sec9; Mar 23, 2008 at 02:23 PM.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:36 AM
  #314  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
9sec9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
removed

Last edited by 9sec9; Mar 23, 2008 at 02:23 PM.
Old Dec 18, 2007, 06:40 AM
  #315  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
yellowEVO21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Be patient................something bigger is coming..........someday.
hurry!


Quick Reply: Reflash, Green, 2 liters and 507 ft lbs/443 whp..



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:04 PM.