Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FMIC - If you don't need the xtra cooling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2007, 05:30 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
EVIL_EV0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,038
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 4 Wheel Slide
www.xs-power.com

$130 shipped for the ic and will add about 25whp to ur setup allowing you for a more aggressive tune...
I'm not sure if I can bite off on this. 25WHP is a big number. Those gains would have to come from better flow because after a beat run in my car the intake manifold is ice cold. Chemical intercooling can pretty much eliminate the need for a FMIC. I'm confident my intake temps are as cool as they need to be.

As for my tune. I could add timing or spike the turbo higher but the gains just aren't there. It would be more aggressive but not provide any returns. I don't think there is much left in the tune.

I'm more curious to hear if an aftermarket FMIC flows better than the stocker. I would hope all of them would cool better but I'm more concerned with flow. Is the FMIC a bottle neck?
Old Dec 7, 2007, 05:31 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
20Grockit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: wilmington, NC
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wouldnt replace the ic until around 400hp. they will add a lil weight depending upon who you go with. i recommend buschur or ams. im running the turbo xs at the moment but its about to go. boost drop doesnt occur til around 35 psi and its only around about 1psi of loss. they also add a little lag but not much but thats already been answered properly above. good luck and let us know if you have anymore questions.
Old Dec 7, 2007, 06:33 PM
  #18  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
EVO8LTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,603
Received 96 Likes on 83 Posts
If you FMIC is sized appropriately for your setup and is designed decently, it can improve spool despite the size and also improve power. I saw noticeable gains in a same day back to back test with everything else kept constant:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=284633
Old Dec 7, 2007, 07:17 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
BURNALL_4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by badhabit90
1. yes they do add some weight depending on the intercooler. AMS has a decent IC with minimal weight addition

2. yes. they will add "some" lag because you will have to fill the intercooler to reach the same PSI as previous. easy fix is to up the boost slightly. typically only 1-2 psi at same mod levels.

3. never heard of a "boost drop" because of an intercooler. unless your running some STUPID psi like 50psi or something. maybe what your refering too is the "boost drop" across the intercooler. meaning that the boost drop is from the cooling fins internally at a given PSI. i dont even think you would notice a 1 psi drop. if you do, up the boost by 1 psi.

4. true. most people dont. however, some people have cams, exhaust, etc...they may also live in some hot *** places to help with the cooling.

in your case, its negligable. you have meth to cool your intake charge. you trust it. i dont think i could. id be awaiting a failure and my engine bay to throw up parts...blegh..

+1
Old Dec 7, 2007, 09:46 PM
  #20  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (73)
 
4WS Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by scorke
Do not listen to this man.

Scorke


thats funny.... i think i run it and make very good numbers and run very good times..


i think you can go **** yourself...
Old Dec 7, 2007, 09:53 PM
  #21  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (73)
 
4WS Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by EVIL_EV0
I'm not sure if I can bite off on this. 25WHP is a big number. Those gains would have to come from better flow because after a beat run in my car the intake manifold is ice cold. Chemical intercooling can pretty much eliminate the need for a FMIC. I'm confident my intake temps are as cool as they need to be.

As for my tune. I could add timing or spike the turbo higher but the gains just aren't there. It would be more aggressive but not provide any returns. I don't think there is much left in the tune.

I'm more curious to hear if an aftermarket FMIC flows better than the stocker. I would hope all of them would cool better but I'm more concerned with flow. Is the FMIC a bottle neck?


25whp is doable with higher boost and more aggresive tune....

Realistically lets say on a typical bolt on car gains are around 15whp on low boost...

ic all make about the same power within 1-2whp... Is it really worth playing 4x more for 1-2whp?


If i was into road racing i would go with a ets 4" or buschur race..... I tested the larger ebay ic and that was garbage....

Cheers!
Old Dec 7, 2007, 10:01 PM
  #22  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
EVO8LTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,603
Received 96 Likes on 83 Posts
Originally Posted by 4 Wheel Slide
If i was into road racing i would go with a ets 4" or buschur race.....
Why? With road racing you have a lot of airflow over the core and you don't need or want a 27 lb. heat sink hanging off the end of the car. Even AMS doesn't use their thick race FMIC on their 35R no-alky time attack car. Also, a 4" core, particularly bar/plate, is really going to hamper airflow to the radiator, which is heavily taxed in road racing.
Old Dec 7, 2007, 10:51 PM
  #23  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (73)
 
4WS Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
to protect against heat soak
Old Dec 8, 2007, 12:21 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jrsimon27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: C.A Honduras!
Posts: 2,574
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
according to dll i gained 20whp with the race buschur fmic
Old Dec 8, 2007, 12:40 PM
  #25  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Import Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lansdale
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well a little off topic but oh well. I can't vouch for the FMIC cuz I installed mine along with other boltons so I couldn't say it made a difference. As for the intake I noticed you had just a drop-in. If you plan on keeping your stock turbo for awhile I would suggest getting the HKS RS Intake. When Sean Ivey tuned my car he suggested I buy this intake because of the power gains he noticed with it and at first I was sceptical but in the end I couldn't be happier. It made 20+whp difference. Of course I got retuned for it but well worth it. If you're interested you might be better off buying a used one for a whole lot cheaper than new. just my two cents.

Last edited by Import Junky; Dec 8, 2007 at 12:42 PM.
Old Dec 8, 2007, 12:42 PM
  #26  
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
lurkerpika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BGevoIX
^^^I actually had one of these on my car. Once I swapped back to stock, peak boost and torque was about 200 rpm sooner and I was making more power at the same boost levels.

Another friend is running the Buschur race intercooler. He hasn't had it on a real dyno, but from his "butt" dyno he said the extra lag is easily noticeable and he feels it doesn't pull any harder than with the stocker. He is actually going to test it on his car. It's a cammed IX on pump 91. We'll see what the numbers say once he has it strapped to a dyno.

uhhhhh we need more info? less butt dyno numbers and more real dyno numbers, you say there was 200 rpm difference and more power, how much more power at what rpm what mods do you have... come on dude, thats liek saying my evo is fast with a turbo... wtf does that even mean

it would make sense if you spooled earlier with the smaller stock ic, but the larger ebay core should allow for better top end, dont know how much better or for how long, but it should...
Old Dec 8, 2007, 04:06 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jrsimon27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: C.A Honduras!
Posts: 2,574
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
also according to my logs the turbo spooled much faster and peak boost was lowered by 100prms
Old Dec 8, 2007, 07:19 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Wow.

First bottom line is, YES you absolutely will gain hp with the stock turbo by switching to a BETTER FMIC. Anyone who says you will not should not be in the business of selling parts/giving advise. End of story. You will ABSOLUTELY gain power.

My suggestion is get the largest/best FMIC right from the start. There is NO down side to going that route.

I wasn't aware AMS doesn't use their race core on their Time Attack car, I find that very puzzling.

We did/do use our Race FMIC on our Time Attack car. We've had ZERO problems with any overheating from it and if you looked at the logs you'd be amazed at how well it controls heat. When we'd go to Time Attack events we'd run all (3) 20 minute sessions each day for testing and such.

As for the Ebay intercooler that was pointed out. No way will it gain 25 whp just bolting it on the car. The cooling properties of the Ebay intercoolers suck....I've tested them, have provided the information on them and they do not cool well. The guys who buy them anyway will argue about it but the facts are the facts.

There is an intercooler thread on our site in the forums now with a bunch of misc. information on FMIC's if you want to go over there and check it out.
Old Dec 9, 2007, 05:55 AM
  #29  
Newbie
 
volkskid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Wow.


My suggestion is get the largest/best FMIC right from the start. There is NO down side to going that route.
even on stk turbo or 20g? will too huge a FMIC not affect the spool up time taken for these relatively small turbos?
Old Dec 9, 2007, 07:05 AM
  #30  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
EVO8LTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,603
Received 96 Likes on 83 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
My suggestion is get the largest/best FMIC right from the start. There is NO down side to going that route.
The exact same thing can be said for a 3.5" TBE vs. a 3" TBE, yet you don't promote everyone getting an oversized exhaust because of the extra weight. Why do you not view intercoolers the same way?

To me, putting your 4" 27 lb. Race FMIC on a stock turbo pump gas car makes about as much sense as putting a 3.5" TBE on the same car.

In fact, it makes even less sense because the weight is located in the worst possible location (i.e., on the nose of an already front-heavy car), and the weight difference between a typical aftermarket intercooler (like your Deluxe or the AMS standard core) (~20 lbs.) and your Race FMIC (~27 lbs.) is an even greater weight penalty than the difference between your 3" TBE (30.8 lbs) and the 3.5" ETS TBE (35.0 lbs.).


Quick Reply: FMIC - If you don't need the xtra cooling



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.