Dyno tune tomorrow
Jan 20, 2008, 06:17 PM
#17
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Six the tune is dialed in for road racing. I am in no way a big drag drag racing freak. Bnice would be better able to go into my MAP details but I think its running 12deg of timing at redline. Mase actually lowered the boost and bumped the timing from what it was when I went in.
I would have been happy at 320-330whp so you can imagine I am pretty excited at 350whp!
I would have been happy at 320-330whp so you can imagine I am pretty excited at 350whp!
Jan 20, 2008, 08:09 PM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to be honest he retarded a degree @ 3500 & @ 7k, lean out the afr's in the higher load cells, & drop the boost a little.
naw the tune is conservative/safe not on the edge, not going to give out to many details since its not my map.
evovin i didnt take my car just went up there with bonestock but i'll be up there soon to dyno tune my ride myself.
naw the tune is conservative/safe not on the edge, not going to give out to many details since its not my map.
evovin i didnt take my car just went up there with bonestock but i'll be up there soon to dyno tune my ride myself.
Last edited by bnice01; Jan 20, 2008 at 08:14 PM.
Jan 20, 2008, 09:03 PM
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no offense but I was there I think i seen the graph really careful. wow let it go
, relax is steven happy with his car YES thats whats matter the most. 
Last edited by bnice01; Jan 21, 2008 at 06:29 AM. Reason: i'm an idiot
Jan 20, 2008, 09:16 PM
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bonestock said he thought the tq would be higher, its not really my place to be saying stuff about his ride. thats all
Last edited by bnice01; Jan 20, 2008 at 09:21 PM.
Jan 20, 2008, 09:51 PM
#26
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I goofed when i printed this dynochart.
The reason why hp/tq isnt crossing at 5252 is because I dont have the scaling the same for WHP and TQ. If you look at the dyno chart scaling, you will see they are close, but not the same...
The numbers etc are correct, except when i scaled the chart, I must have scaled them differently.
The torque is exactly where it should be, you have to use the right margin scaling. it made 300 ft/lbs of torque. and 350 whp.
Bonestock, it was great meeting you guys, hope you had a good trip back, and glad to see your happy with the results
. Id be happy to save a copy of a dyno chart with the same scaling. i didnt realize it when i gave it to you lolMase
Last edited by Mase; Jan 20, 2008 at 09:56 PM.
Jan 20, 2008, 10:22 PM
#27
Looks like this DD is setup to read like a dynojet.
Curves look great though, nice flat torque.
Glad you are enjoying the GMBCS bonestock. If your boost is fluctuating a bunch I would also make sure the BDEL and error correction is dialed in tight.
Last edited by razorlab; Jan 20, 2008 at 10:25 PM.
Jan 21, 2008, 06:14 AM
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did a tuner really just say this? 5252 always, unless the tq/hp have different scales on each side like this chart.
Looks like this DD is setup to read like a dynojet.
Curves look great though, nice flat torque.
Glad you are enjoying the GMBCS bonestock. If your boost is fluctuating a bunch I would also make sure the BDEL and error correction is dialed in tight.
Looks like this DD is setup to read like a dynojet.
Curves look great though, nice flat torque.
Glad you are enjoying the GMBCS bonestock. If your boost is fluctuating a bunch I would also make sure the BDEL and error correction is dialed in tight.
Last edited by bnice01; Jan 21, 2008 at 09:09 AM.
Jan 21, 2008, 06:37 AM
#29
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did a tuner really just say this? 5252 always, unless the tq/hp have different scales on each side like this chart.
Looks like this DD is setup to read like a dynojet.
Curves look great though, nice flat torque.
Glad you are enjoying the GMBCS bonestock. If your boost is fluctuating a bunch I would also make sure the BDEL and error correction is dialed in tight.
Looks like this DD is setup to read like a dynojet.
Curves look great though, nice flat torque.
Glad you are enjoying the GMBCS bonestock. If your boost is fluctuating a bunch I would also make sure the BDEL and error correction is dialed in tight.
Funny you should say that. I asked Mase that very question and his response was that it was not.
The boost problem is the BPV atleast... I hope.
Jan 21, 2008, 07:19 AM
#30
It is an interesting torque curve for a stock turbo for sure. Very flat. I suspect some of this is due to the tuning using the GM BCS, and some is due to the fact that you're only spiking to 21psi initially. Kind of a trade-off here - more top-end with less low-end torque. I personally prefer to have a bigger torque spike initially on the stock turbo for having fun on the streets.