Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

USA Pump Gas Dyno and Track #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #31  
Martin@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Mount Prospect, IL
Um yes it's me. I made a new screen name about a week ago. Posting under AMS didn't really put a name behind the post. BTW I'm not talking crap, I'm speaking about my experience tuning and the facts.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #32  
Liqquid's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 4
From: Sag-Nasty, MI
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
That is Martin at AMS. He had an Account called "AMS" but he has stopped using it so people can put a name to his posts.

Martin is the owner and head engineer behind everything that is done here at AMS. Those are his words and him posting

Eric
Alright, editing now
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #33  
JC evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Australia
i hope this duscussion will stay civil, very interested in this.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #34  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Martin is a very civil person, his main reason for posting is to educate. He just wants people to see the other side of pump gas tuning and its risks.

Eric
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #35  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
We are talking about martin and DB, their companies keep in touch and always keep it civil. Ive always enjoyed to see what 2 of the best tuners out there thought about each others methods.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #36  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Martin,

I think you've taken offense to my "tuning situation" I said to sharkbite. So you know I've only spoken to sharkbite once and that was about him stopping here on his way back from your shop just to see what his car made on our dyno, he called me but never came to our shop. I have never tried to sell him anything or get him to come here. The "tuning situation" that I was referring to is, I was told he was offered a 2 year warranty from you guys on his engine as long as NOBODY else tuned the car, that is his "tuning situation". I meant nothing else by it. I also said that if someone offered me a 2 year warranty on their work I'd sure as hell not have someone else tune my car.

I guess when you were making all that power you should have made a post about it, it would have been much more believable. Tuning on E85 and making power is nothing like making it safely with 93, I am sure you know that. E85 is more comparable to C16.

As for 600 whp being safe or not safe on 93 octane. From the looks of Peter's car it's pretty safe. 9,000 miles and no troubles. The videos, dyno runs and constant *** whooping he keeps handing out should be proof enough. To question it seems silly, to imply it isn't safe is rediculous, if it was so dangerous he'd have blown up or broken by now, you don't agree?

While 620 whp on 93 octane may be pushing the limits a bit wouldn't you agree 420 whp is a little over conservative?

I haven't had a singe, NOT ONE, 500+ whp pump gas EVO leave here yet that has hurt the engine, not ONE.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #37  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
This will be interesting. Hopefully stay civil too.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #38  
JC evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Australia
600hp, 30 psi on 93 may be safe for one engine, but might be the total opposite for a different engine combination. I guess you cant really compare what is safe on one motor to another, so many different factors to consider. The things i would be most worried about with making big power on pump fuel are high EGT's and knock control and detection.

What EGT's are considered safe?

Why haven't stand alone ecu manufactures really put some effort into making a really good knock detection system?
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #39  
Sean@Iveytune's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: Linden, NJ
Originally Posted by Martin@AMS
Dave,

"tuning situation" The tuning situation Dave, is that I've tuned our original EVO way before it ever became a drag car to well over 500whp on pump gas. This was about 3 or 4 years ago. It did it on our own car and pushed the limit, but I don't tune customers cars that way for a reason. I made big pump gas numbers almost 10 years ago on a 4 cylinder turbo Ford motor using eprom tuning software. Doing the same with today's parts I could make closer 600whp on our EVO but it's NOT SAFE!! What you consider safe and what I consider safe is obviously different and my interest is in keeping an engine running safely and not on or over the ragged edge.

I could make more power on Steve's car on pump gas no problem, but if his car pounds the bearings out or hurts an exhaust valve down the road and I know it's because the car is detonating the whole time, I couldn't sleep at night. Do you really think that 600whp on a 2.0L at 31psi on 93oct is not detonating and safe? You have to go beyond the simple AEM 'noise' sensor and really understand the principles of detonation and the consequences. Yes I like to keep my customers tunes safe, and I feel the glory of getting some high HP pump gas #'s out there isn't worth the potential for damage. Dave you mentioned your BR272 exhaust cam as one of the keys to the pump gas tuning, can you elaborate on that? I'm curious because I've designed a set of cams almost 10 years ago and now I'm in the middle of a huge cam test and analyzing valve events and lift profiles for turbocharged engines.

Once you get away from a stock ECU and it's complex knock algorithm it's pretty easy to overlook knock events.
Many of you would be surprised to know how advanced and complex knock detection really is, and the AEM knock voltage or most any other stand alone that is monitoring knock sensor voltage output is merely a small piece of the puzzle.

Big pumpgas Numbers get easier with the evolution of combinations on these evos, the gt42 cars will do it easily, no big deal, better volumetric efficiency.

I remember pushing the stock motor combo over 500 on pump/meth, this was a few yrs ago and I cannot remember it being common at that time, today quite common.

Martin is an excellent tuner, and I have seen many examples of his work. There are very few AEM tuners out there as good as Martin. In Martin's defense, I would say 420hp on 23psi is what I turn alot of cars out at very safe, and exactly what they make with those sized turbos, sure there is more that can be made if you push, but the margin of safety becomes less and less.

You will notice with the Hondas that a B18 C motor can do it very easily, 600HP pumpgas, less boost than an evo engine with the same sized turbo, engine design good breathing will allow it to make the HP at lower boost levels.

As for 32psi on an evo, with the bigger available cams, Jun, BR whatever I do them all the time they will make 600HP, I have accidentally made that without the meth not even realizing it was not on till I noticed the elevated knock levels, so it's doable, but it will be knocking on 93 octane pump, and you can do it but I expect the engine to degrade eventually, but who runs them to 100K like that.

The laws of physics dictate what can be done on certain fuels, if not so why not make 700HP on 93 octane.

Not all customers are carefull and meticulous about their cars, some do not even notice when something is wrong. Therefore I would be very reluctant sending the car out like that. Put the meth on it, let's have a little more safety margin.

AEM knock detection while very usefull on cars that are lightly modded is less usefull after a certain point, especially when you do supras and certain other cars it becomes very obvious, I agree with martin 100% there is more to knock detection than that.

Dave has a good customer, and he obviously is in tune with the car. It did make 600HP on pumpgas, it did beat up on a few cars, it seems to be still running. I do know it weighs in at 2575lbs without driver. With 750 wheel HP it will fly.


Sean

Last edited by Sean@Iveytune; Mar 11, 2008 at 07:04 PM.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #40  
JC evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by davidbuschur

While 620 whp on 93 octane may be pushing the limits a bit wouldn't you agree 420 whp is a little over conservative?
Seems 520whp may be just right
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #41  
rush63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: 1,643 miles Southwest of IveyTune
Originally Posted by Nez136
We are talking about martin and DB, their companies keep in touch and always keep it civil. Ive always enjoyed to see what 2 of the best tuners out there thought about each others methods.
It's called balance of "power" during the cold war years
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #42  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
One other thing, this is directed at Martin. I am not going to get into a pissing match with you (AMS) publically or privately because we have always gotten along. Many people here would like to see us do that I am sure. I have the utmost respect for you (Martin) and AMS. So, I am really hoping that your response to me was just because you misunderstood what I meant about Sharkbite's "Tuning situation".

I also cannot hold a technical conversation with you Martin, you are an engineer and proud of that, as you should be. I am an ignorant back woods redneck that just gets the job done. So if you want to talk about designing camshafts you will have to call Crane or Comp or GSC. I just know that of all the cam testing we've done (on the dyno, track and street) that our cams seem to work the best with pump gas. Why? I have no idea and don't really care either, as long as they work I am happy with that, that's because I am "simple".

JCEVO1, you are 110% absolutely correct. 500+ whp is not only NOT safe on every build it isn't even possible on MOST builds. It has only become a safe possibilty for me in the last year or so. I can't do it on every car because every car isn't set up properly.

As a side note I am 100% confident I could do it using all AMS parts or parts that they atleast offer, so I am not saying it can only be done with OUR parts.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #43  
warp9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
From: Near the hOle
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
One other thing, this is directed at Martin. I am not going to get into a pissing match with you (AMS) publically or privately because we have always gotten along. Many people here would like to see us do that I am sure. I have the utmost respect for you (Martin) and AMS. So, I am really hoping that your response to me was just because you misunderstood what I meant about Sharkbite's "Tuning situation".

I also cannot hold a technical conversation with you Martin, you are an engineer and proud of that, as you should be. I am an ignorant back woods redneck that just gets the job done. So if you want to talk about designing camshafts you will have to call Crane or Comp or GSC. I just know that of all the cam testing we've done (on the dyno, track and street) that our cams seem to work the best with pump gas. Why? I have no idea and don't really care either, as long as they work I am happy with that, that's because I am "simple".

JCEVO1, you are 110% absolutely correct. 500+ whp is not only NOT safe on every build it isn't even possible on MOST builds. It has only become a safe possibilty for me in the last year or so. I can't do it on every car because every car isn't set up properly.

As a side note I am 100% confident I could do it using all AMS parts or parts that they atleast offer, so I am not saying it can only be done with OUR parts.

Get er done!
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #44  
crcain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Just an idea, but let us keep posts in this thread really focused on the thread topic and leave replies to people who can contribute to the notion of what is involved in making good power on pump.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #45  
4G63DSM's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: In front of a Catia screen
i wonder if anyone is going to mention the difference between detonation and pre-ignition?

Google it people!!

ALso, AMS,, what are you using for your cam design software? AVL fire, boost, and excite? Are you guys ricardo software fans? Gt power? 4stHEAD? virtual four stroke?

I would love to know!!


Quick Reply: USA Pump Gas Dyno and Track #'s



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 PM.