E85 stock turbo english racing tune, dyno graph inside.
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E85 stock turbo english racing tune, dyno graph inside.
This is my first dyno run since I had cams 02 housing hotside and the e85 conversion done, needless to say I am very very happy.
It was a dyno day that consisted of about 10 sti's countless wrx's a few honda's and 2 evo's. Probally 40 cars in total and I came out on top by about 65 hp . I dont know how dyno dynamics compares to a dynojet.... anybody??
Props to English Racing for the tune the car is oh so smooth. All mods are in sig.
It was a dyno day that consisted of about 10 sti's countless wrx's a few honda's and 2 evo's. Probally 40 cars in total and I came out on top by about 65 hp . I dont know how dyno dynamics compares to a dynojet.... anybody??
Props to English Racing for the tune the car is oh so smooth. All mods are in sig.
Last edited by konad; Mar 15, 2008 at 10:12 PM.
#3
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my experience, my numbers changed about 20% from DynoJet to a DynoDynamics. But it seems those dyno numbers were fudged to look like DynoJet numbers, because 414whp/.80 = 517whp DynoJet which is crazy high for a stock turbo. IMO I would go to the track this season and calculate your hp from your weight/et/and traps.
EDIT: Why did you let out at 6725rpms?
EDIT: Why did you let out at 6725rpms?
Last edited by cssaddictm4; Mar 15, 2008 at 06:45 PM.
#6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my experience, my numbers changed about 20% from DynoJet to a DynoDynamics. But it seems those dyno numbers were fudged to look like DynoJet numbers, because 414whp/.80 = 517whp DynoJet which is crazy high for a stock turbo. IMO I would go to the track this season and calculate your hp from your weight/et/and traps.
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re-Dyno'ed at 1320 with meth @ 481whp.
EDIT: Read Warr's post here: #12 @ https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...namics+dynojet
Last edited by cssaddictm4; Mar 15, 2008 at 06:53 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mustang ==> Dyno Dynamics ==> Dynojet ==> Dynapack
As a reference point, here are two dyno graphs from when my S2000 was N/A:
This one is from a dynapack (highest reading dyno):
This one is from a dyno dynamics (second to the lowest reading dyno):
Same mods. Within a day of each others. Same conditions. 246rwhp vs. 225rwp. A difference of ~9%. Granted this wasn't a direct comparison the dynos in question, but it is comparing the highest reading dyno with the second to the lowest reading dyno.
Everything I have read states that a dynojet typical reads 2-3% higher than a dyno dynamics.
Food for thought: Dyno numbers are like statistics--the originator of the data can skew the results depending on the desired "message".
#12
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure how to get ahold of the correction factor, they were trying to get us in and out as fast as possible. If i were to give them a call would I be able to get this information?