Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Magnus intake manifold.... good bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2008, 07:56 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
heltzelfitness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Magnus intake manifold.... good bad?

has anyone upgraded to this product? just curious on what some of the hp gains are? if you did... or is it even worth the trouble of going to that extent?
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/e..._nxplumbed.jpg
heltzelfitness is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 08:03 AM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
version 2 beta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all magnus products will yield a HP gain. Their intake manifolds are sick! Mid range response and power def raise. Use the search button or contact magnus directly. Allot of people run their product on their cars.
version 2 beta is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 09:23 AM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
heltzelfitness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice... thats for the input...
heltzelfitness is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 09:31 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
evokel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i heard you lose so much more than stock, and i also heard its been discontinued
evokel is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 09:32 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
 
EvoBroMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the original magnus manifolds were worse than stock, and have been discontinued.


this has been experienced by several people, and has been dyno proven by a couple vendors. buschur hates them, and has posted his dyno's of the original manifold.

Last edited by EvoBroMA; Apr 20, 2008 at 09:34 AM.
EvoBroMA is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 10:08 AM
  #6  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
heltzelfitness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dexmix
the original magnus manifolds were worse than stock, and have been discontinued.


this has been experienced by several people, and has been dyno proven by a couple vendors. buschur hates them, and has posted his dyno's of the original manifold.
wow... yeah i did notice that they were discontinued but i do know a couple of places that still sell them. but i'm gonna check out some others...
heltzelfitness is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 10:43 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
CO_VR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Magnus manifolds have not been discontinued. Their EVO manifolds were changed in 2005 (CNC'd bell mouthed velocity stacks and other changes). Paul Nelson made 1014 HP on one recently. A recent magazine article said "discontinued", but the correct statement would have been "the earlier model was modified, and replaced by the newer, improved version".

Dave Buschur got mad at a comment that Magnus made about Dave's polishing bearings and said he was going to do a test to show that the early Magnus manifold lost power. He found an early model of the Magnus manifold on E-Bay, and posted his results of a dyno test. When Dave Buschur did his test of the early Magnus manifold (in the last six months) the newer Magnus manifold had been out for 2+ years. Dave Buschur repeatedly pointed out that he did not test the newer (current) Magnus manifold.

Dyno testing on the current Magnus manifold shows positive gains. You can find a thread on that testing, with all the underlying data, here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=331233, or on the Magnus website, I'd guess.

Pick whichever one you feel comfortable with after you look at all the test data.

Last edited by CO_VR4; Apr 21, 2008 at 03:49 PM.
CO_VR4 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 04:19 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
mullen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: the moon
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ask buschur...bad all the way, he sold all of his at cost and said for display only
mullen is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 05:08 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
version 2 beta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ that's the problem.

the Magnus manifolds make power hands down. Unless you have proof otherwise i suggest to keep your mouth shut. What would asking buschur do?

besides it is very well known that buschur will down play any magnus intake manifold after what happened at the DSM shootout in 2k6 in think. Which by the way was won by magnus with his own off the shelf intake manifold that you can now buy.

educate yourself and don't take another person's word for it.

research

research

research

and above all don't listen the the buschur fan club.
version 2 beta is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 06:32 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
 
Liqquid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sag-Nasty, MI
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by heltzelfitness
has anyone upgraded to this product? just curious on what some of the hp gains are? if you did... or is it even worth the trouble of going to that extent?
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/e..._nxplumbed.jpg
Are you kidding me?

Direct port nitrous, you'll gain a$$loads with that one provided you hook those lines up
Liqquid is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 07:14 PM
  #11  
Newbie
 
Nmusaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Cali 909
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read the latest Dsport
Nmusaf is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 07:16 PM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Puyallup, wa
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nmusaf
Read the latest Dsport

thinking for yourself and thinking objectively also have good points, no offense but the test left alot to be desired in the terms of completeness and circumstances.

The Magnus is a great manifold, it has a very nice design and made with the best quality. It will really help up in the higher rpms
Billy@EnglishRacing is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 07:44 PM
  #13  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
turbolag4500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burlington, Wa
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Magnus is a great manifold, it has a very nice design and made with the best quality. It will really help up in the higher rpms


mmmkay.... a buddy of mine who owns a decked out wrx and a few DSM's here in town have had their manifold crack at the welds. one actually blew the whole seam weld at only 20 psi on a 18g. looks like it was unzipped.
heres just one of many posts: http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/bolt...-manifold.html
funny how Brent Rau doesn't even use a magnus manifold yet is sponsored by them. those things are trash. JMF, AMS, BJ's, intake mani's are much better.

Last edited by turbolag4500; Apr 20, 2008 at 07:46 PM.
turbolag4500 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 08:56 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
filter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by inneedof
thinking for yourself and thinking objectively also have good points, no offense but the test left alot to be desired in the terms of completeness and circumstances.

The Magnus is a great manifold, it has a very nice design and made with the best quality. It will really help up in the higher rpms
proof?

everything ive seen says no.
filter is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2008, 09:00 PM
  #15  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Dogboxracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some will believe anything they read.
Dogboxracing is offline  


Quick Reply: Magnus intake manifold.... good bad?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 PM.