Making 380WHP with $635
May 14, 2008, 07:21 PM
#136
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm glad somebody's translating for him.
Look, he may be the best tuner in the world, nobody is arguing that, but he clearly does not understand the benefit of standards. When he's got the Dyno jacked up to show a stock Evo making 280whp, it causes confusion among the community.
Thanks for the invite, but I would never have anything to do with someone that deceives their customers and then argues with a veteran's totally rational reasoning.
Look, he may be the best tuner in the world, nobody is arguing that, but he clearly does not understand the benefit of standards. When he's got the Dyno jacked up to show a stock Evo making 280whp, it causes confusion among the community.
Thanks for the invite, but I would never have anything to do with someone that deceives their customers and then argues with a veteran's totally rational reasoning.
He DID NOT JACK UP THE NUMBERS..... If the number are jacked up it is the owner of the dyno that has it calibrated that way. It has nothing to do with BlowoffSilver (Kasey). He is a good tuner, because I know who taught him alot of it.
He doesnt deceive anyone. He just tunes there cars to get the timing and a/f right and tries to make a solid smooth power curve.
I dont know who the hell you are talking about being a veteran. Blowoffsilver has been around longer than WAR.. WAR makes decent points. Whenever I post about this dyno, I always say that it is calibrated to read like a dynojet, because thats what the owner of the dyno told me about 3 or 4 years ago.
Brian
May 14, 2008, 07:23 PM
#137
I dont think you have any scientific method of determining how fast this car is from your "arm chair". You have no idea if it's above average / below average / or just average.
He did, and he has a printout from a Mustang Dyno to backup his "claim".
I dont think the tuner was deceitful in any way. Most knowledgable people know that comparing numbers from different dyno's is a exercise in futility. I'm sure the tuner has nothing to do wth the calibration of the machine. If it's consistant then it serves the tuner's needs. If you want accurate HP numbers that can be compared Dyno to Dyno then I've heard the DynoJet inertia machines are the best for this. If your wanting to get your car tuned proper then you should look for a shop with a loading dyno. The reason why most tuners like Mustangs is not because of the numbers they spit out but due to the fact that when you tune with them the tunes need very little touch up if any. If their Mustang is calibrated to read more like a DynoJet then good for them, they won't have as many people going to the neighboring DynoJet tuner because he gives them bigger numbers. You really have to understand that some shop owners want thier dyno to be accurate instead of "low reading".
Those numbers are unimpressive, there are stock turbo cars making more power than that. Let me guess, those are low reading dyno numbers right? Now who's being deceitful.
I dont think airflow numbers were ever claimed. His stock turbo might push more air at 30psi than you do at 22psi though. And his car might be tuned better than your car. I dont know, maybe you two could race and find out.
He did, and he has a printout from a Mustang Dyno to backup his "claim".
I dont think airflow numbers were ever claimed. His stock turbo might push more air at 30psi than you do at 22psi though. And his car might be tuned better than your car. I dont know, maybe you two could race and find out.
Last edited by Mr. Evo IX; May 14, 2008 at 10:07 PM.
May 14, 2008, 07:25 PM
#138
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brian
May 14, 2008, 07:29 PM
#139
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OP, your evo is no where near fast. It's just an average bolt on evo.
Then you come to emphasize you made 380whp on Mustang dyno...haha...
I'll be surprised if your car doesn't blow up, looking at the deceitfulness of your tuner.
I made 411whp on mustang dyno @6250rpm with big turbo and built motor & head.
You're saying your little stocker flows only a bit less than my T61..
This has got to be the funniest thread of the month.
Then you come to emphasize you made 380whp on Mustang dyno...haha...
I'll be surprised if your car doesn't blow up, looking at the deceitfulness of your tuner.
I made 411whp on mustang dyno @6250rpm with big turbo and built motor & head.
You're saying your little stocker flows only a bit less than my T61..
This has got to be the funniest thread of the month.
Thats some EGO for your ***.
Brian
Last edited by TURBODAWG; May 14, 2008 at 07:34 PM.
May 14, 2008, 07:48 PM
#141
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PG County, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont think you have any scientific method of determining how fast this car is from your "arm chair". You have no idea if it's above average / below average / or just average.
He did, and he has a printout from a Mustang Dyno to backup his "claim".
I dont think the tuner was deceitful in any way. Most knowledgable people know that comparing numbers from different dyno's is a exercise in futility. I'm sure the tuner has nothing to do wth the calibration of the machine. If it's consistant then it serves the tuner's needs. If you want accurate HP numbers that can be compared Dyno to Dyno then I've heard the DynoJet inertia machines are the best for this. If your wanting to get your car tuned then you should look for a shop with a loading dyno. The reason why most tuners like Mustangs is not because of the numbers they spit out but due to the fact that when you tune with them the tunes need very little touch up if any. If their Mustang is calibrated to read more like a DynoJet then good for them, they won't have as many people going to the neighboring DynoJet tuner because he gives them bigger numbers. You really have to understand that some shop owners want thier dyno to be accurate instead of "low reading".
Those numbers are unimpressive, there are stock turbo cars making more power than that. Let me guess, those are low reading dyno numbers right? Now who's being deceitful.
I dont think airflow numbers were ever claimed. His stock turbo might push more air at 30psi than you do at 22psi though. And his car might be tuned better than your car. I dont know, maybe you two could race and find out.
He did, and he has a printout from a Mustang Dyno to backup his "claim".
I dont think the tuner was deceitful in any way. Most knowledgable people know that comparing numbers from different dyno's is a exercise in futility. I'm sure the tuner has nothing to do wth the calibration of the machine. If it's consistant then it serves the tuner's needs. If you want accurate HP numbers that can be compared Dyno to Dyno then I've heard the DynoJet inertia machines are the best for this. If your wanting to get your car tuned then you should look for a shop with a loading dyno. The reason why most tuners like Mustangs is not because of the numbers they spit out but due to the fact that when you tune with them the tunes need very little touch up if any. If their Mustang is calibrated to read more like a DynoJet then good for them, they won't have as many people going to the neighboring DynoJet tuner because he gives them bigger numbers. You really have to understand that some shop owners want thier dyno to be accurate instead of "low reading".
Those numbers are unimpressive, there are stock turbo cars making more power than that. Let me guess, those are low reading dyno numbers right? Now who's being deceitful.
I dont think airflow numbers were ever claimed. His stock turbo might push more air at 30psi than you do at 22psi though. And his car might be tuned better than your car. I dont know, maybe you two could race and find out.
I trapped 122 mph with 386whp on that dyno. 127-128 mph with 430whp. You do the math.
May 14, 2008, 10:13 PM
#144
Did I honestly just read 10 pages of this bull****? Blowoffsilver you are an idiot. Step back from the computer and read some of the crap that comes out of your mouth. How are you trying to justify this dyno when stock evo's make 280awhp on it?
May 14, 2008, 10:32 PM
#145
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i do have a ? first off i have a 06 evo IX mr i have a TBE, UICP,LICP,FMIC, AEM Intake, HKS 272 MIVEC cams, walbro 255, and 25 psi on a halman MBC i put down 344whp and 349 wtq on a dyno jet my car is tuned my sean glazer at extrememotorsports but of my ZT2 wideband i run rich on a WOT pull on 4th gear my car afr's will read 11.1 afr is that too rich? am i getting robbed of power or do those mods sound right for the amount of power that i have
May 15, 2008, 04:07 AM
#148
~
In all though i know tyler, He is a cool kid and hes happy with his tune and Kasey is a good tuner. Just because he is not some "uber" internet star tuner does not mean you should doubt his knowledge on tuning and talk crap about him.
I tryed to stay away from this post but some of you guys "NOT ALL" are just uping your post counts and talking smack for no reason.
get a life, take a break from the internet go get some air.
Last edited by Evoz; May 15, 2008 at 04:13 AM.
May 15, 2008, 07:04 AM
#150
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: maryland
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He did, and he has a printout from a Mustang Dyno to backup his "claim"..
Either OP doesn't even know how a properly set up mustang dyno reads or he thinks he's evo is super mega freak.
I dont think the tuner was deceitful in any way. Most knowledgable people know that comparing numbers from different dyno's is a exercise in futility. I'm sure the tuner has nothing to do wth the calibration of the machine. If it's consistant then it serves the tuner's needs. If you want accurate HP numbers that can be compared Dyno to Dyno then I've heard the DynoJet inertia machines are the best for this. If your wanting to get your car tuned proper then you should look for a shop with a loading dyno. The reason why most tuners like Mustangs is not because of the numbers they spit out but due to the fact that when you tune with them the tunes need very little touch up if any. If their Mustang is calibrated to read more like a DynoJet then good for them, they won't have as many people going to the neighboring DynoJet tuner because he gives them bigger numbers. You really have to understand that some shop owners want thier dyno to be accurate instead of "low reading".
Those numbers are unimpressive, there are stock turbo cars making more power than that. Let me guess, those are low reading dyno numbers right? Now who's being deceitful.
I dont think airflow numbers were ever claimed. His stock turbo might push more air at 30psi than you do at 22psi though. And his car might be tuned better than your car. I dont know, maybe you two could race and find out.
Some e-thugs out of nowhere with their badass 'green' and '37r' did.
Last edited by evilbada; May 15, 2008 at 07:12 AM.