Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Making 380WHP with $635

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2008, 07:22 AM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bonestock!
Lets see a dyno sheet.
First post.
Old May 12, 2008, 07:25 AM
  #32  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PG County, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets see some track time. These numbers are high.
Old May 12, 2008, 07:34 AM
  #33  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
dahuii77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmmmmmmmmmm....................................... ...........nice but still wondering how can you make 380 whp with those mods?? sounds kind of weird..im making that and see my mods.
Old May 12, 2008, 07:48 AM
  #34  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is absolutely ridiculous. The acronym "WHP" has absolutely no meaning anymore. If you understand the losses that will exist because of the drivetrain and through friction at the wheels, a stock Evo will make like 200-220 atw.

So this guy has made 160 hp atw from an exhaust, air filter and tune?

Also, if the car is 220 atw stock, that means to get to 280 hp at the flywheel, you have to use about 24% losses. So the 380 hp atw would then be 500 hp at the flywheel.

You really think Evos make 500 engine hp with a tune and exhaust?

THIS IS RIDICULOUS
Old May 12, 2008, 08:30 AM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
anjapower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
overinflated dyno numbers, end of story. On a dynojet, this car would struggle to put down much over 330whp.
Old May 12, 2008, 08:35 AM
  #36  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
uglyevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Alaska
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definitely can't be right. numbers are way to high to be realistic for the mods
Old May 12, 2008, 08:45 AM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
SpunEvoIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whats dyno was it on?
Old May 12, 2008, 09:11 AM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree... with those mods on a real untampered with MD should be at max in the 300 whp range....especially on stock cat and 93 octane. Unless of course there is some NOS or something else this guy isn't telling us.

I would check with your tuner to make sure you got the right dyno sheet.
Old May 12, 2008, 09:32 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
slicedbreadno2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trap speeds never lie.
Old May 12, 2008, 09:35 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,910
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by slicedbreadno2
Trap speeds never lie.
Roughly what should a full weight IX with a 5 speed trap if it makes 380whp on a DynoJet?

Roughly what should a full weight IX with a 6 speed trap if it makes 380whp on a DynoJet?

Last edited by Mr. Evo IX; May 12, 2008 at 09:48 AM.
Old May 12, 2008, 09:43 AM
  #41  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
2highpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge Ohio
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was your baseline pull before the tune?
Old May 12, 2008, 10:01 AM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice stuff, but don't emphasize that it was a "Mustang Dyno," because it's obviously not reading like a normal MD.

Mr. Evo IX, both would be around 116-117mph, but it depends on what you mean by "full weight IX." People always use the terms "full weight" and "bone stock" when neither are true. Also, there are many versions of the IX - all with different stock weights.
Old May 12, 2008, 10:22 AM
  #43  
Evolving Member
 
sonicteam120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bronx / coram
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that's a crazy setup for being stock but yet it smell's fishy cause if you get that on everything stock ebay dp & tbe what else is stock are you still using your stock fmic if not what fmic are you on how many inches please give more description asap cause I'm in the process of build a 400whp weekend evo 8 and i totalup way more stuff in parts just to make 400whp
Old May 12, 2008, 10:31 AM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
wickdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: OH
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ya there has to be something misreading on the dyno numbers..

i mean on bushur's dyno, i only put down 286awhp and I have the walbro, a JIC ti exhaust, custom cf intake, boost controller (which in the post should put me at 380) in addition to 680 injectors and 264 cams and dynoflash tuned by al.. that wastegate must make the world a difference

pretty sure I should be by the 400 mark on this dyno
Old May 12, 2008, 10:58 AM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
dsmfan95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Nice stuff, but don't emphasize that it was a "Mustang Dyno," because it's obviously not reading like a normal MD.

Mr. Evo IX, both would be around 116-117mph, but it depends on what you mean by "full weight IX." People always use the terms "full weight" and "bone stock" when neither are true. Also, there are many versions of the IX - all with different stock weights.
I have the heaviest version of the Evo and ran 91mph/115mph while making 360ish on this same dyno. I believe 116mph is attainable with the OP's car. With your post I would say that this dyno reads close to a DynoJet. That is if the settings are still the same from when I dynoed a long time ago.

Originally Posted by wickdaddy
ya there has to be something misreading on the dyno numbers..

i mean on bushur's dyno, i only put down 286awhp and I have the walbro, a JIC ti exhaust, custom cf intake, boost controller (which in the post should put me at 380) in addition to 680 injectors and 264 cams and dynoflash tuned by al.. that wastegate must make the world a difference

pretty sure I should be by the 400 mark on this dyno
I doubt you would make that much honestly. Another Evo8 with 272s, 880s, basic bolt-ons, and an Evo9 turbo on pump gas didn't break 400 the same day. Taylors car seems to run very strong for the mods.


Quick Reply: Making 380WHP with $635



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.