Making 380WHP with $635
May 12, 2008, 11:34 AM
#47
Removal of crash beams, interior, battery, etc would be an intentional weight reduction and I would'nt consider such a car "full weight".
IMO It's plausable that a IX with those mods could make 380whp on a DynoJet with a good high boost tune. I'm betting that Mustang has some kind of correction applied so that it reads like a DynoJet.
Last edited by Mr. Evo IX; May 12, 2008 at 04:56 PM.
May 12, 2008, 11:54 AM
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Numbers seem awfully inflated to me. I bet it would put down less on a Dynojet. Bring it to the track see what it runs. I went 378whp on a DJ on 93octane and went 118.00mph, so if you can run 117+, the numbers are legit.
May 12, 2008, 01:34 PM
#51
Evolving Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know its kind of sad to see fellow evo owners knocking each other off, like their puppets! This is what i have to say about this dyno crap! I tuned the car, and the same dyno has put stock 9's around 270whp and 280whp many times. you may say thats high and thats fine. The reason that he came on here letting you fellow evo owners know how he did, and then you turn it around to rub it in his faced is just plain sorry! Taylors car is a beast! In the same day a evo green 9 with brian crower 272's and buschur fmic and all intercooler pipes with big injectors made 421whp. The guy was mad cause he thought i put more time into taylors. Plain and simple taylor has a beast of a evo 9!
Congrats Taylor!! At least a couple of more guys could give him congrats not unless you guys are sti lovers!
Congrats Taylor!!
At least a couple of more guys could give him congrats not unless you guys are sti lovers!
May 12, 2008, 01:37 PM
#52
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Winston Salem
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the heaviest version of the Evo and ran 91mph/115mph while making 360ish on this same dyno. I believe 116mph is attainable with the OP's car. With your post I would say that this dyno reads close to a DynoJet. That is if the settings are still the same from when I dynoed a long time ago.
I doubt you would make that much honestly. Another Evo8 with 272s, 880s, basic bolt-ons, and an Evo9 turbo on pump gas didn't break 400 the same day. Taylors car seems to run very strong for the mods.
I doubt you would make that much honestly. Another Evo8 with 272s, 880s, basic bolt-ons, and an Evo9 turbo on pump gas didn't break 400 the same day. Taylors car seems to run very strong for the mods.
, If only I had MIVEC
May 12, 2008, 01:46 PM
#54
Evolving Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK Thanks for the input. We know now that the dyno is set up to read crank hp. That clears alot up
May 12, 2008, 01:48 PM
#55
no worries man. I didnt bash or say anything negative at all. I ask a simple question. Since your the tuner/dyno operator. why did you set up the MD to read crank HP? 270-280 is right around stock crank hp
Last edited by kreionic; May 12, 2008 at 01:52 PM.
May 12, 2008, 01:59 PM
#57
Evolving Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May 12, 2008, 02:03 PM
#58
Evolving Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GUYS I WILL ASK AGAIN IF YOU WILL PLEASE SEND CONGRATS TO THIS NICE CAR AND FAST NO MATTER THE NUMBERS CAUSE HES PROUD OF IT!
