Ivan@AMS

If those claims can be backed up, they have shattered the laws of thermo dynamics. This guy would get the Nobel Prize and the million dollars associated with it. They could take the steam and hook it to a generator and this could then power the electric motor used to turn it. They could condense the steam back into water and feed this back into the unit and it would run forever. With 70% over unity, they could take the extra energy and power homes, cities and even the WORLD!!!

FREE ENERGY. No more gas bill, no more electric bill, no more gasoline, no more war!!!!

Or just claims not backed up.

Ivan@AMS

Thats a water torch. Nothing special about that at all. It uses electrolysis to extract Hydrogen and Oxygen and burns it. It takes a LOT of electricity to power one. They are nice because you dont have to store compressed oxy / acetylene (dangerous) nor will you run out of gasses (assuming you dont run out of water). Cost wise, its more expensive than traditional gas cutting methods.

Ivan@AMS

HERE is a link to a girl that jumped 20ft in the air to catch a foul ball. You should believe everything you see on the internet.

Have you purchased or built a system yet? Have you proved science wrong and collected your million dollar prize?

94AWDcoupe

iTrader: (125)

Doesnt the patent office count as independent? He was granted patents for his inventions. You do have to prove they work in front of the patent officials, otherwise you wont get a patent.

More research indicates he was driving the rail buggy with 6 tubes of the hho generators. Later he design the water splitter that split the water right at the spark plug. eliminating the need for the 6 bulky tubes.

LilRico

iTrader: (21)

94AWDcoupe, I'm with you... I think it can be done from what I've seen first hand...

johnjonfenomeno

iTrader: (17)

enough talk.. someone put one together and lets get some dyno numbers and mpg numbers!!

Ivan@AMS

A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state to an inventor or his assignee for a fixed period of time in exchange for a disclosure of an invention. (nothing to do with it actually working)

In the United States in the 1800's, there was a requirement that the applicant provide a working model of the invention. The requirement that each applicant submit a model was dropped by the late 1800's, although many of the models may now be seen in the Smithsonian and elsewhere and are a fascinating glimpse into the creative efforts of inventors from the past century.

Examiners in the US Patent Office do, to this day, have the power to require submission of a working model in a particular case, but the requirement is imposed very rarely, usually in cases where an applicant claims to have invented a perpetual motion machine.

94AWDcoupe

iTrader: (125)

And that is exactly what happened to stanly meyers. He was required to prove his claim because his invention did claim to produce far more gas than the simple electrolysis would account for. If you had actually watched the stan myers videos you might actually change your opinion on this subject.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcy3JbGjQwo

LilRico

iTrader: (21)

Bad *** video.... But the video looks old... So why hasn't this been out for a while now or have I been missing it all along?

Crzbiasmr

iTrader: (4)

94AWDcoupe

iTrader: (125)

I am with you. That video is from 1995? I dont have TV so I have an excuse. Whats yours?