Results from Precision 6265 Turbo on Evo IX!!! 469whp on Pump!!
Jun 28, 2008, 11:00 AM
#16
STOCK MOTOR
STOCK ECU
STOCK CAMS
PUMP GAS
.82AR REAR HOUSING
95+ DEGREES AIR TEMP
Jun 28, 2008, 11:50 AM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im not comparing it to any of the FASTEST SPOOLING HTA's, but even an HTA on a stock motor stock cammed stock ecu can get full boost by 5100.... 5700 seems a bit late, but Im still thinking of getting it with the ETS kit... Like I said, Congrats on the numbers! 
Jun 28, 2008, 11:56 AM
#20
APPLES to APPLES would be taking a 35r hta and switching it out on the same day on the same car on the same turbo kit w/ the same tuner.. Take the info for what it is.. if i put a .63a/r on this car ill guarantee i can get it to spool right at 5000rpm or better 25psi..
Jun 28, 2008, 12:05 PM
#21
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea thats kind late spool, My gt35 82. stock cams on evo 8 hits full boost 28psi around 4800rpms...nice powe it make so i guess the 6262 will be little better in spool??
Jun 28, 2008, 12:14 PM
#24
Thanks for the info Mike.....i posted in my thread as i didn't see this first.
65 wheel and .82 = slower spool of course.
We may be doing a comparison of a reg 35r to 6262 on my car in the next few weeks if we get a turbo in......i'm still on the fence and i want to see what this reg 35r can do w/ my new mods.
65 wheel and .82 = slower spool of course.
We may be doing a comparison of a reg 35r to 6262 on my car in the next few weeks if we get a turbo in......i'm still on the fence and i want to see what this reg 35r can do w/ my new mods.
Jun 28, 2008, 12:19 PM
#25
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dulles, VA 20166
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this on a dynojet? The results look mediocre. Not very impressed with the gains vs something like a 35r or even a T61. Regardless of the spool time, you could have went with a 63 AR and not had everyone "compare". Then it would have been apples to apples.
Jun 28, 2008, 12:21 PM
#26
but unfortunately its not my car its a customer who wanted a .82 rear housing so before you mention what would be obvious had it been MY car maybe ask... Would you care to list a dyno chart for us to compare apples to apples since you stated the results are mediocre?? Im doing what i can here with what i have to work with.. yes its a dynojet and YES its accurate and dont forget the Air temps before you mention inflation.. Thanks!!
Last edited by AWD Motorsports; Jun 28, 2008 at 12:24 PM.
Jun 28, 2008, 12:27 PM
#27
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dulles, VA 20166
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank Nick for the response but unfortunately its not my car its a customer who wanted a .82 rear housing.. Would you care to list a dyno chart for us to compare apples to apples since you stated the results are mediocre?? Im doing what i can here with what i have to work with..
yes its a dynojet and YES its accurate and dont forget the Air temps before you mention inflation.. Thanks!!
but unfortunately its not my car its a customer who wanted a .82 rear housing.. Would you care to list a dyno chart for us to compare apples to apples since you stated the results are mediocre?? Im doing what i can here with what i have to work with.. yes its a dynojet and YES its accurate and dont forget the Air temps before you mention inflation.. Thanks!!
Mike,
Your not understanding what I'm saying. Its not a diss on you at all. A comparison of two SETUPS is what they are asking for. Not housings. Maybe the comparison with a a standard 35r or HTA with WHATEVER housing will make thee results shine or quiver. We don't know because there isn't a graph saying such.
For your part you seem to do a very good job. Keep it up.
Now as far as the Dynojet comment is concerned, its quite simple. The numbers are just that. Are they corrected? Are they not? Regardless of temp we can still compare. Granted the "numbers" will be different because of air density, but that doesn't mean that on other dyno's it won't do the same.
For example on our Mustang dyno those numbers equate to about 395 WHP. Thats mediocre and inline with UNHYPED 35R's and T61 style turbo's.
Jun 28, 2008, 12:34 PM
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is kinda laggy espically with stock cams. u put any kind of real cams in there and u will be seeing full boost at 6000rpms. the power is there, but if u ask me, this turbo acts more like a 37r then a 35r.
what does it flow?
and by me saying this, is not a dis to anyone. just want to put that out there.
what does it flow?
and by me saying this, is not a dis to anyone. just want to put that out there.
Jun 28, 2008, 12:35 PM
#29
Mike,
Your not understanding what I'm saying. Its not a diss on you at all. A comparison of two SETUPS is what they are asking for. Not housings. Maybe the comparison with a a standard 35r or HTA with WHATEVER housing will make thee results shine or quiver. We don't know because there isn't a graph saying such.
For your part you seem to do a very good job. Keep it up.
Now as far as the Dynojet comment is concerned, its quite simple. The numbers are just that. Are they corrected? Are they not? Regardless of temp we can still compare. Granted the "numbers" will be different because of air density, but that doesn't mean that on other dyno's it won't do the same.
For example on our Mustang dyno those numbers equate to about 395 WHP. Thats mediocre and inline with UNHYPED 35R's and T61 style turbo's.
Your not understanding what I'm saying. Its not a diss on you at all. A comparison of two SETUPS is what they are asking for. Not housings. Maybe the comparison with a a standard 35r or HTA with WHATEVER housing will make thee results shine or quiver. We don't know because there isn't a graph saying such.
For your part you seem to do a very good job. Keep it up.
Now as far as the Dynojet comment is concerned, its quite simple. The numbers are just that. Are they corrected? Are they not? Regardless of temp we can still compare. Granted the "numbers" will be different because of air density, but that doesn't mean that on other dyno's it won't do the same.
For example on our Mustang dyno those numbers equate to about 395 WHP. Thats mediocre and inline with UNHYPED 35R's and T61 style turbo's.
I realize what you asked Nick but should i just not post anything because i cant post right now what they want to see.. Unfortunately this is the 1st local customer that i sold a turbo to that i could actually get some feedback with.. I am satisfied with the results and the customer is ecstatic actually. Considering i ordered him a hta 10 weeks ago and it still hasnt come.. This turbo is priced right and IMO the results are not mediocre by any means.. Thats my opinion..
Im not going to get into the dyno debate with you.. im glad you have a formula figured out based on Dynojet #'s..
with that calculation my car would run 9.5 on less than 600whp.. Thats makes me feel good!!!
Jun 28, 2008, 12:36 PM
#30
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge Ohio
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the numbers are pretty impressive considering stock ECU, head, cams, etc. I am kinda surprised someone bought this turbo before even upgrading thier cams though.
I am kinda surprised someone bought this turbo before even upgrading thier cams though.