373ft-lbs / 352awhp stock turbo, 91 octane
#48
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
350 on a dynojet would probably read about 300 on a properly setup Mustang.
We've had guys that have made 400 on a dynojet, make around 355 or so on our mustang. I've also seen an Evo that made a claimed 400 on a socal DynoDynamics make 305 on a Mustang, But of course, every dyno is different so comparing dynos is probably the number one reason for the huge Evom Fog(tm).
Last edited by razorlab; Jul 4, 2008 at 04:19 PM.
#49
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your input! Let's tackle this from a more specific angle. A 50hp difference between a dynojet and a Mustang dyno would probably be overcome by a difference in boost by 4psi? Agreed?
#50
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
Possibilities are infinite.
The dyno is a tool, pure and simple. The more people that start to understand that, the thinner the Evom Fog will be.
#51
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now you are getting into a realm of alot more variables. 4psi more peak? 4psi more up top? Won't happen with a stock turbo. It will taper no matter what. Timing changes with that boost? Different turbo? more flow mods?
Possibilities are infinite.
The dyno is a tool, pure and simple. The more people that start to understand that, the thinner the Evom Fog will be.
Possibilities are infinite.
The dyno is a tool, pure and simple. The more people that start to understand that, the thinner the Evom Fog will be.
In my example, I was simply stating that, while all other variables remaining constant, a 4psi gain could make up a 50hp difference. Case in point: at 1.5psi more my Evo made 14hp more (an even more impressive 31ft-lbs more!).
#52
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
If I had a magic wand that could eliminate all the "My car should make this on this dyno cause it made this on this dyno, and my friends boyfriends Evo makes this on this dyno in Kansas" statements on this board, I would have used it years ago, with a big smile on my face.
Last edited by razorlab; Jul 4, 2008 at 05:04 PM.
#53
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am simply stating that comparing two different Evos, on two different brand of Dynos, that are known to read much different, and then throwing in yet another variable of change, is recockulious, and from what I have seen over the years, is a perfect recipe for disappointment. At that point, it's just number chasing, which is not what dynos should be used for.
If I had a magic wand that could eliminate all the "My car should make this on this dyno cause it made this on this dyno, and my friends boyfriends Evo makes this on this dyno in Kansas" statements on this board, I would have used it years ago, with a big smile on my face.
If I had a magic wand that could eliminate all the "My car should make this on this dyno cause it made this on this dyno, and my friends boyfriends Evo makes this on this dyno in Kansas" statements on this board, I would have used it years ago, with a big smile on my face.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aby@MIL.SPEC
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
16
Aug 6, 2016 10:23 AM
Boomba Racing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
22
Mar 1, 2011 10:31 PM
TURBODAWG
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
73
Feb 9, 2006 08:38 AM