FP EVORed 470whp on 26psi with 100oct UL fuel
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ct
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love the mod list and the graph. I have the same types of mods without the 02 housing and meth instead of 100octane on the stocker. I would love to have that power and have it pull strong to 8k and beyond. Can't wait to get my hands on one..
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
really good number!!!!...i was waiting to see results like this wit basic mods....just waiting to see results on basic bolt ons and 93 oct.....waiting for more results but so far looks like im gettin a red!!!
#22
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice numbers.
But I have a question. Why did you dyno it with 100 oct? Why didn't you do it with 91 or 93 oct? I just think that it'll be better for us to understand the characteristic of the turbo better, because that's what we pump in the car most of the time.
But I have a question. Why did you dyno it with 100 oct? Why didn't you do it with 91 or 93 oct? I just think that it'll be better for us to understand the characteristic of the turbo better, because that's what we pump in the car most of the time.
#24
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Most of my customers are seeing 380-400 with the green on 93 and none of them have heads or even the best cams etc... just your normal setup. I'm hoping the Red would put them at 400 minimum and maybe 425+ that would be nice on an average working guys setup.
#26
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But I have a question. Why did you dyno it with 100 oct? Why didn't you do it with 91 or 93 oct?
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I only drive the car on 100 octane fuel. I have not had 93 in the tank for a loooong time. The main reason is that the Motec M800 does not have a knock control feature and I cannot risk hurting my motor during testing. If the motor breaks during testing then you HAVE TO START ALL OVER, which pretty much sucks. So I spend $5.99 a gallon on the 100 and dont sweat being on the "edge" counting on the knock retard to bail me out when it comes to the timing map - that way I dont hurt anything. It is a matter of finishing without failure vs failing and not finishing the test battery at hand.
I've recently started looking at your FP turbos. How would you compare this to your FP Green and the Green HTA?
#28
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How would you compare this to your FP Green and the Green HTA?
The Green is what is always has been.
The Red spools up a little slower than the Green, but makes lots more power. I'd say that most guys will spool the Red up at about 4200rpm.
#29
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what was the 60'?
One of the biggest contributors to the power of the Red model is our new 67mm turbine wheel. It dwarfs the stock 56mm wheel as well as the 60mm wheel used in the Green. The 60mm turbine wheel has served us well over the years, but I think the writing is on the wall for it at this point. It is almost as laggy as the 67mm wheel on the same compressor and cannot deliver as much power to the shaft as the 67mm wheel either. At the same time the turbine pressure stays below a 1:1 ratio to a much higher engine RPM with our new 67mm turbine wheel.