FP RED vs 35R
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am comparing the two of these for purchase at some point... At modest tune these are not THAT far apart. Yes the 35r is a clearly more powerful turbo, but the RED is cheaper, spools faster, and is a bolt on. These cannot be compared in terms of maximum capabilities, but in terms of overall package on moderately modded car, I think this is a fair comparison that I would like to learn more about.
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (135)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cant remember exactly where I read it but i thought i saw where the RED flows 60lbs per minute. I cant remember what the 35R flows
if so 60lbs a minute is nothing to sneeze at.
Its natural to compare two turbos that are "next" to eachother on the power scale. There have been threads comparing 50trim vs 30r, 30R vs 35R, 35R vs 37R.
So why not this comparison. The Red flows more than the 30R, right?!?
if so 60lbs a minute is nothing to sneeze at.
Its natural to compare two turbos that are "next" to eachother on the power scale. There have been threads comparing 50trim vs 30r, 30R vs 35R, 35R vs 37R.
So why not this comparison. The Red flows more than the 30R, right?!?
of course the Red has been proven already to make a TON of power on fully built cars.. with professional drivers running 10's on race gas.. but, it is still never going to be able to outflow a fully built 35r setup in the end..
IMO .. It for sure the best setup to look "stock" though.. I wanted to get one because it would be a fun street car... but then I just realized that I want something with a lot more potential... Every one has different ideas of what kind of power and spool-up that they want..
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
I am comparing the two of these for purchase at some point... At modest tune these are not THAT far apart. Yes the 35r is a clearly more powerful turbo, but the RED is cheaper, spools faster, and is a bolt on. These cannot be compared in terms of maximum capabilities, but in terms of overall package on moderately modded car, I think this is a fair comparison that I would like to learn more about.
#20
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NORTH CAROLINA
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont get me wrong i love the 35r, but the red has so much more to offer!! Spool up for one, its gonna be at least 1k rpm faster and make more torque! Also how many people is going to look under your hood and say, wow is that a stock turbo?? They want even know the difference! 35r's do make way better power when you crank the boost, but you still got that lag!! But in the end everyone will have their preference. But i say red cause of the spool and potential to go tens on stock bottom end! Also it looks just like the stock 9 turbo.
#21
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your right i guess the 60lbs/min is just a rumor but i thought it was advertised at 60 but just checked buschurs and its advertised at 56
#23
The red is essentially a bolt on stock looking 30r. Same flow rates as an HTA 30r, same peak HP/tq, just looks stock. Think of it that way and this is an absurd comparo, unless you just want to compare what makes more sense for each individual based on their desires...just like you would with a 30r/35r
#25
I am comparing the two of these for purchase at some point... At modest tune these are not THAT far apart. Yes the 35r is a clearly more powerful turbo, but the RED is cheaper, spools faster, and is a bolt on. These cannot be compared in terms of maximum capabilities, but in terms of overall package on moderately modded car, I think this is a fair comparison that I would like to learn more about.
#27
Let me claify, IM NOT DISSING THE 35R. I love the 35R and i WAS seriously eyeing one until the RED came out. What im saying in regards to power, that on a full bolt on car this turo can make pretty close to 500whp. We have already seen what this turbo has done on an all-out buschur car on race gas (530-ish i think. i gotta find the thread again). If you just made 530ish on your RED and you want more then the 37R may be your next step instead of the 35R. to me if you already have a RED with a built motor and want more power then the 37R is the way to go.
This is just a comparison/debate/informative thread on two great turbo options that we have.
This is just a comparison/debate/informative thread on two great turbo options that we have.
#30
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a different opinion than most. I agree you can't compare the two. The reason you can't is because the 35r is such a better choice. An ETS kit with a 61mm turbo with tubular mani, dp, ewg, licp etc. is like 2700. The RED turbo is 1900. I am willing to bet that the ets kit would blow the red out of the water for not a lot more money and way more parts. It will spool slower yes, but that is all subjective as to what is slow spool. The red is simpler. I'm just not sold on a $1900 turbo that doesn't make more power than this.