Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Camshafts for Evo red... idle, revlimit, power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2008, 02:54 PM
  #46  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
evossl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Inside evo
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by EVO8URV8
So, Ted, which one would u prefer on a factory head with a Red between the GSC S2s and the Kelford 272s on a 8?
Almost same question but on Evo 9 . Upon comparing 2 cams GSC S2 has more agressive intake lift 11.2mm vs 11.0mm in kelfords yet AMS cam test kelfords edge out and has a better top end. This test is on evo 8. Would the outcome be different on mivec engine?
Would a kelford 280/272 be considered overcam on red turbo?
Members that have an exprience on either cams ? I encourage you chime in.
Your input would be appreciated.
Old Aug 16, 2008, 04:14 PM
  #47  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Davethewave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVO8URV8
Kelfords
+1
Old Aug 16, 2008, 05:30 PM
  #48  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by evossl
Almost same question but on Evo 9 . Upon comparing 2 cams GSC S2 has more agressive intake lift 11.2mm vs 11.0mm in kelfords yet AMS cam test kelfords edge out and has a better top end. This test is on evo 8. Would the outcome be different on mivec engine?
Would a kelford 280/272 be considered overcam on red turbo?
The difference in 0.2mm lift is small, and on a factory head, anything more than ~10.5mm lift can't make a difference for the reason I noted.

A MIVEC engine can be made to give somewhat different results, depending on the intake cam timing. MIVEC introduces another variable into the equation that can help us or hurt us, depending upon the tune.

Would a Kelford 280/272 be considered overcamming with a FP Red? I don't know. IIRC, the cam set used in AMS' test was a 272/272, and any such test illustrates trends, not absolutes. Keep in mind that the AMS test involved one particular combination, and the timing of all cams were adjusted with cam gears to meet published spec. If we substitute a factory head (AMS' head was ported) and just toss 'em in, that may very well change things to some extent. Likewise, if we have a turbo with a smaller hotside, that typically makes the point of 'overcamming' come sooner, simply due to the increased exhaust back pressure. Differences in intake manifold tuning will create some difference as well. Essentially, the best way to get a result as reliably close to AMS's as possible is to duplicate the exact setup they used. The more differences there are in one's setup, the greater likelihood that one will see differences in his results.
Old Aug 16, 2008, 08:49 PM
  #49  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
john.schuber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vail, Colorado
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow guys thanks a lot for all the responses. It seems any of these cams would be a good choice. I will probably go with JUNS unless I decide to get a full port and polish.
Old Aug 16, 2008, 10:18 PM
  #50  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thatdudety's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: eden nc
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im still sayin kelfords.. =)
Old Aug 16, 2008, 10:42 PM
  #51  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mpfcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
decided to go with Kelford 272's myself...
Old Aug 16, 2008, 10:42 PM
  #52  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
slow/ass/rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ca
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
get the cosworth M3's i gained lots of TQ
Old Aug 17, 2008, 04:39 AM
  #53  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
john.schuber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vail, Colorado
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After looking at AMS Cam shootout It seems the kelfords and gsc s2 will give very similar results just a minimal differences in hp gains, either top end or mid range.

Can you closely compare these to the JUNS (disregarding a built head and only including head studs, springs and retainers in the mix)? The grind is similar as stated before.
Old Aug 17, 2008, 07:09 AM
  #54  
Account Disabled
 
Shacochis06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the AMS test was on martins fully built 35r evo....you cant go off those results for your set up
Old Aug 17, 2008, 08:15 AM
  #55  
Account Disabled
 
4G63W8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Greece
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about the hks 280s any opinions on these Ted,both in a ported and unported head on a red??
Old Aug 17, 2008, 09:10 AM
  #56  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
HKS 280s are fine with a factory head and valvetrain, and that's about it. They are outclassed by offerings with better ramp rates, such as the cams we are discussing here. But then again none of the cams we are discussing here should be used with the factory valvetrain, period.
Old Aug 17, 2008, 06:27 PM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
1badgsex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: bucks county, pa/philly
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ted B
It can only as far as its lift, which is 10.8mm. This is about where a factory head goes dead, which leads one to believe that the JUNs were designed around a factory head.

A competently ported head will see greater airflow beyond 10.8mm lift. Cams like the GSCs and Tomei are able to take advantage of this because they give greater lift.

This doesn't mean that the JUNs are not capable cams, because they certainly are. What it means is that for certain setups, there is room for improvement. As to what difference this makes when the rubber hits the road depends upon a variety of things.

thanks for the answer i will search more on this to read up on this.....
Old Aug 17, 2008, 06:36 PM
  #58  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
1badgsex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: bucks county, pa/philly
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and iam still gonna go with JUNS =!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for the win!!!!!
Old Aug 17, 2008, 06:54 PM
  #59  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by 1badgsex
and iam still gonna go with JUNS =!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for the win!!!!!
You might wanna check out the BR 272's. I heard they're similar.
Old Aug 17, 2008, 09:02 PM
  #60  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Ted: Is the cylinderhead of your JAM VIII engine unported? And if so, is this why you have stuck with the relatively low lift, HKS cams on your own engine ?


Quick Reply: Camshafts for Evo red... idle, revlimit, power



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:51 PM.