Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

kelford 272 vs FP4r

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #61  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by shuttlegoose
not to bring this back from the dead but does anybody know if the fp4rs are readily available for the ix, i don't want to be on a 3 month waiting list like the people waiting for reds...
They are available. My friend ordered his set a few weeks ago, they had plenty in stock, and his shipped right away.

On a IX, the FP4R is pretty tough to beat. Faster than stock spool, nice fat midrange power, and from what I've seen they hold more power in the upper RPM's compared to the Kelford 272's. The drawbacks to the 4R's is their rough idle and low speed drivability issues; like everything else in life, tradeoffs are a biatch

Last edited by Kracka; Jun 11, 2009 at 02:12 PM.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #62  
Bster13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, CT
So on a VIII, Kelford FTW, on a IX FP4R FTW?
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:27 PM
  #63  
black95tt's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
I run FP4R's. Drive ability is fine, even with AEM EMS. Idle isn't bad at all. Not sure where that is coming from. It idles at 1100 just fine. Purrs like a kitten.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:43 PM
  #64  
evillancer06's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 3
From: *S O C A L *
does it pur or does it lope?
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #65  
slow/ass/rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: ca
Originally Posted by noypiC50
this guy is using fp4r cams with great results
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ock-turbo.html
yep thats me i love them the car drives amazing and the cams sound great and made way more power for me than the cossie m3's and m2's the car dropped off up top with the m3's now the car pulls all the way to 7k
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #66  
Gary@MellonRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: miami florida
off topic , why do several people say then that kelfords 272 are the same as m2 ???
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #67  
black95tt's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by evillancer06
does it pur or does it lope?
I wouldn't say it lopes. It idles very steadily When first starting up in the cold it might lope but when warmed up it's very tolerable. No complaints.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 08:12 PM
  #68  
slow/ass/rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: ca
Originally Posted by gfng
off topic , why do several people say then that kelfords 272 are the same as m2 ???
they are both 272's but the kelfords are more aggressive they are a different cam lobes
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 09:36 PM
  #69  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Bringin this back folks, need some guidance.

Ive got a IX, Im stuck between Kelford 272's and FP4R's, with S2's also in consideration.

An FP Red is going in in a few weeks. I want a cam thatll spool this thing up quick (before 4000 if possible), make nice midrange power and still deliver a nice amount of power up top.

I will be revving to about 8300 and running 30-34psi on the Red. I like choppy/lopey, noticeable idles. From what Ive seen, most Red's run in combo with the Kelfords but I'd really like to do the FP4R's if I can be sure I wont be disappointed if I choose them over the tried, tested and true Kelford 272s. Haven't seen any cars running a Red with 4R's.
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 06:39 AM
  #70  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Skip the Kelfords on the IX, they're really doggy down low, especially compared to the 4R's. I run the 4R's on my stock turbo and one of my friends runs the 4R's with a Red on his IX.
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 12:21 PM
  #71  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
lol I just messaged you back mang.

The thing Im concerned about is that the 4R's are going to fall off hard up top, which obviously the Kelfords dont do.
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #72  
tdubbz's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by gfng
off topic , why do several people say then that kelfords 272 are the same as m2 ???
identical lift/duration specs but I from what I understand the two behave a bit differently in the real world.
Old Apr 18, 2010 | 10:20 PM
  #73  
CosworthSti's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by DSMer...
Does anyone know or has done it, run stock springs/retainers w/Kelford 272's?
I did and developed a nasty lifter tick after like 1500 miles. Then I built my head before anything bad happened. Dont do it
Old Apr 18, 2010 | 10:42 PM
  #74  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Did you bleed your lifters prior to installing the cams?
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 12:03 AM
  #75  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
I would say that S2's are a great IX cam while kelford 272's are a great VIII cam.


Quick Reply: kelford 272 vs FP4r



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 AM.