Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur Racing doing a start to finish EVO8 build, need input.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2009, 11:45 AM
  #226  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Johnboy1065
thats right, a manly rod will never break! lol....it reminds me of all those Chuck norris jokes

If I tell my wife I am buying a MANLEY ROD she will prob give me a dirty look

I always liked the Pauter rods - they are a great shop also

Manley has been getting a super good reputation lately though and they are on the east coast
Old Jan 25, 2009, 12:14 PM
  #227  
Newbie
 
equinsu-ocha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scorke
You add final drive because you cannot rev as high, using the stroker you get the added tq/spool advantage but you need a gearing advantage to keep up with cars that can rev to 9k because you are limited with respect to redline.

The gearing effectively makes your 8-8500rpm redline closer to what the 2l builds can handle speed wise.

Scorke
I understand the new FD getting you the top end without the revs, but wouldn't the increased torque from the extra stroke, which is beneficial more in the lower rpm be negated by the new FD? Example: 2.3 spools X turbo 400 rpm sooner, but taller FD means you need to spin up 400 rpm sooner to get the same torque multiplication as the shorter FD would in the first place.

Sorry for going OT, but this has been bugging me for a long time.
Old Jan 25, 2009, 04:31 PM
  #228  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
blueevoIX, yes, the top resonator is similar to what I saw the huge losses on but not exactly, it was even worse than that.

The idea behind the 4.11 final drive is simply to allow the car to have more top end speed and keep the RPM down.

Do not confuse BC, Brian Crower, with CROWER. They are two completely different companies. I do not use BC's products because they are all knock-offs of someone else's from what I can tell and built in China. We just got a set of sample rods sent in, copies of the actual Crower rod. I just have no respect for that kind of crap. I do use and believe in genuine Crower parts but not the knock off crap.

The rev limit of the 2 liter cannot be matched with a 4.11 gear ratio mated to a 2.3 liter engine. Our typical 2 liter will go to 10,000 rpm with no problem. Depending on the build I can get quite a bit more than that out of it if need be, 12,000 isn't impossible. Is it needed? Probably not but it will do it.
Old Jan 25, 2009, 04:33 PM
  #229  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Back when my RS was running 10's I switched from the 4.11's to the stock gear ratio, I could hardly tell the difference and the times didn't change if I remember correctly. The 3.84 gear is a different story.
Old Jan 25, 2009, 04:38 PM
  #230  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
blueevoIX, yes, the top resonator is similar to what I saw the huge losses on but not exactly, it was even worse than that.

The idea behind the 4.11 final drive is simply to allow the car to have more top end speed and keep the RPM down.

Do not confuse BC, Brian Crower, with CROWER. They are two completely different companies. I do not use BC's products because they are all knock-offs of someone else's from what I can tell and built in China. We just got a set of sample rods sent in, copies of the actual Crower rod. I just have no respect for that kind of crap. I do use and believe in genuine Crower parts but not the knock off crap.

The rev limit of the 2 liter cannot be matched with a 4.11 gear ratio mated to a 2.3 liter engine. Our typical 2 liter will go to 10,000 rpm with no problem. Depending on the build I can get quite a bit more than that out of it if need be, 12,000 isn't impossible. Is it needed? Probably not but it will do it.
This is interesting

I assumed that Brian Crower was the guy's son

I am going to check into this

Al
Old Jan 25, 2009, 04:41 PM
  #231  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Nephew I believe.
Old Jan 25, 2009, 04:46 PM
  #232  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Nephew I believe.
Brian Crower grew up at Crower Cams & Equipment Company, where he headed up the Crower Sport Compact division since its inception. With Crower Cams heavily focused on the V8 market, Brian saw an opportunity to truly support the needs of the Sport Compact community. With the support of his family, Brian Crower Inc. was formed to deliver the highest quality internal engine components for a variety of popular engine platforms.
It seems to be just yet another example of a famous US brand who sold out to the lure of fast profits selling china made junk

I guess its just the sign of the time

Still, after I saw what he was doing, I started to shy away from Crower never the less
Old Jan 25, 2009, 04:46 PM
  #233  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,354
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Dave, Al


What are your thought on the 2.1L blocks?
Old Jan 26, 2009, 02:50 PM
  #234  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
There isn't a 2.1 block, there is a 2.1 build. It uses a 2.4 block and can use a variety of pistons/rods to bring it to 2.1.

The 2.4 block is a cheap way to build an engine because the blocks can be bought cheap. It's a good alternative for someone on a budget trying to fix an EVO with a bad block.

I had a request from one of our wholesalers to build one for a customer of theirs. I have custom rods and pistons being built now and should have them in about 2 weeks time. These parts will become normal stocking items for us after this first engine is finished.
Old Jan 26, 2009, 02:58 PM
  #235  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
There isn't a 2.1 block, there is a 2.1 build. It uses a 2.4 block and can use a variety of pistons/rods to bring it to 2.1.

The 2.4 block is a cheap way to build an engine because the blocks can be bought cheap. It's a good alternative for someone on a budget trying to fix an EVO with a bad block.

I had a request from one of our wholesalers to build one for a customer of theirs. I have custom rods and pistons being built now and should have them in about 2 weeks time. These parts will become normal stocking items for us after this first engine is finished.

Nice to see some other budget options for getting a customer a built motor.. I personally dont like to do drop ins because we have a 100% success rate with your motors.. Im not going to try to reinvent the wheel when i know your builds work.. I look forward to more information on the 2.4L setup.. This will be great for the guy that blows a hole in a 4g63 and wants to get back on the road w/ a better than stock motor.. Thanks!!

Mike
Old Jan 26, 2009, 03:23 PM
  #236  
Evolved Member
 
JC evo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
It seems to be just yet another example of a famous US brand who sold out to the lure of fast profits selling china made junk

I guess its just the sign of the time

Still, after I saw what he was doing, I started to shy away from Crower never the less
So is BC a part of Crower?
Old Jan 26, 2009, 03:48 PM
  #237  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
NO, BC is a seperate company from Crower.
Old Jan 26, 2009, 04:41 PM
  #238  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
There isn't a 2.1 block, there is a 2.1 build. It uses a 2.4 block and can use a variety of pistons/rods to bring it to 2.1.

The 2.4 block is a cheap way to build an engine because the blocks can be bought cheap. It's a good alternative for someone on a budget trying to fix an EVO with a bad block.

I had a request from one of our wholesalers to build one for a customer of theirs. I have custom rods and pistons being built now and should have them in about 2 weeks time. These parts will become normal stocking items for us after this first engine is finished.
Its an interesting story actually

We had a customer who bought a used Evo which he picked up at the bargain price of $8000 but he felt it needed a "tune up"

Upon examining the car we found 80 psi of compression on all 4 cylinders

Some previous owner had installed the 2.4 Block - 2.4L rods and pistons and a Evo crank. The piston was almost .33 " on an inch below the deck.

Since we only roll with Buschur Racing on engines we obviously needed to arrange a Buschur style soultion to the situation

Given that these Gallant 2.4 L blocks can be had for $200 - $400 in my area used it seems like a more economical solution for those who may wind up with a ruined Evo block

Al
Old Jan 26, 2009, 04:47 PM
  #239  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,354
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
There isn't a 2.1 block, there is a 2.1 build. It uses a 2.4 block and can use a variety of pistons/rods to bring it to 2.1.

The 2.4 block is a cheap way to build an engine because the blocks can be bought cheap. It's a good alternative for someone on a budget trying to fix an EVO with a bad block.

I had a request from one of our wholesalers to build one for a customer of theirs. I have custom rods and pistons being built now and should have them in about 2 weeks time. These parts will become normal stocking items for us after this first engine is finished.
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
Nice to see some other budget options for getting a customer a built motor.. I personally dont like to do drop ins because we have a 100% success rate with your motors.. Im not going to try to reinvent the wheel when i know your builds work.. I look forward to more information on the 2.4L setup.. This will be great for the guy that blows a hole in a 4g63 and wants to get back on the road w/ a better than stock motor.. Thanks!!

Mike
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Its an interesting story actually

We had a customer who bought a used Evo which he picked up at the bargain price of $8000 but he felt it needed a "tune up"

Upon examining the car we found 80 psi of compression on all 4 cylinders

Some previous owner had installed the 2.4 Block - 2.4L rods and pistons and a Evo crank. The piston was almost .33 " on an inch below the deck.

Since we only roll with Buschur Racing on engines we obviously needed to arrange a Buschur style soultion to the situation

Given that these Gallant 2.4 L blocks can be had for $200 - $400 in my area used it seems like a more economical solution for those who may wind up with a ruined Evo block

Al

Thanks guys for your responses!! I can see that for the guy on a budget, the 2.4L block can be a inexpensive alternative to get back on the road.

But money and cost aside, is there any significant power difference between the 2.0L build vs. the 2.1L build presuming that both motors use a HTA35R?

secondly, will one build last longer than another?

Thanks!
Old Jan 26, 2009, 05:57 PM
  #240  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
Nice to see some other budget options for getting a customer a built motor.. I personally dont like to do drop ins because we have a 100% success rate with your motors.. Im not going to try to reinvent the wheel when i know your builds work.. I look forward to more information on the 2.4L setup.. This will be great for the guy that blows a hole in a 4g63 and wants to get back on the road w/ a better than stock motor.. Thanks!!

Mike
These are my thoughts exactly

Why pay $1,800 for a new block when you can get one for $200


Quick Reply: Buschur Racing doing a start to finish EVO8 build, need input.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:01 AM.