Precision Turbo 6262 daily driver???
Aug 28, 2010 | 11:15 AM
#107
Horsepower is directly proportional to acceleration... the more you shift your power to the right the better you use the torque that you create to make the car accelerate.
Engine life is directly proportional to the amount of fuel you put through it.
Easier to stay in the meat of the powerband? You have a gear box and a lever right? Find the right gear.
Far less enjoyable when you're getting walked by everything under the sun. Enjoyable to you is a personal opinion... yet you're stating it as a fact.
Exedy Triples, Quartermasters, and Tilton's all shift well at 9k+
What clutch besides those three do you have that holds 550whp and can take a 1.6 60'?
Keeping RPMS low is good for fuel efficiency, cheap valvetrain, and hauling 80k pounds... not for performance. If you like lugging a car around go buy a diesel jetta.
Engine life is directly proportional to the amount of fuel you put through it.
Easier to stay in the meat of the powerband? You have a gear box and a lever right? Find the right gear.
Far less enjoyable when you're getting walked by everything under the sun. Enjoyable to you is a personal opinion... yet you're stating it as a fact.
Exedy Triples, Quartermasters, and Tilton's all shift well at 9k+
What clutch besides those three do you have that holds 550whp and can take a 1.6 60'?
Keeping RPMS low is good for fuel efficiency, cheap valvetrain, and hauling 80k pounds... not for performance. If you like lugging a car around go buy a diesel jetta.
Jul 14, 2013 | 01:45 PM
#108
Hope some one can help me out with my question. Whats everyone opinion on a 6262 T4 .81ar on a stock block...too laggy? I was looking to make around 530hp...1st time buying a T4 and didn't not know that a T3 and T4 AR are not the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
