Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur Racing begins "Project White" a wicked street build.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #121  
evo loco's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati,Oh
can not wait to see this car done
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 07:34 PM
  #122  
mrdevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Ct
Originally Posted by 8UpUrV8
Dave, have you used the 4.11 final drive before? If so, impressions? I'm assuming you'll get the same mph per gear as you would with the 2L? Thanks

I guess it depends on how high he's going to rev it..
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 10:06 PM
  #123  
rr06rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Jville
Dave,

Are the turbo tuff rods being used for all your standard 2.3ltr builds now and if not, is there any additional charge? These rods are kick ***, imo. Just as Gary Gardella what he thinks of them. He used box stock rods in his car and ran 2 seasons without a freshing up and look at the power that car was making.......incredible....
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 01:39 AM
  #124  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
...Slorice, not sure if I am going to pull some stumps but I was thinking of towing a big boat with it
Naw! Go either fifth wheel or gooseneck then, but sans the wing. You should have sufficient torque at any rate.
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 01:42 AM
  #125  
Johnboy1065's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville Tennessee
Originally Posted by sparky
Naw! Go either fifth wheel or gooseneck then, but sans the wing. You should have sufficient torque at any rate.


he can tow a car to the track with this new 2.3 liter car, then run both of them
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #126  
2muchboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
From: LOS Angeles CA
I dont think he will get the same MPH. Im guessing this set up will rev a few thousand rpm shy of the 2.0L


Originally Posted by 8UpUrV8
Dave, have you used the 4.11 final drive before? If so, impressions? I'm assuming you'll get the same mph per gear as you would with the 2L? Thanks
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 08:24 AM
  #127  
BlueEvo61106's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Awesome build Dave, once again you will build a street beast!!
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #128  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
No, we are not going to use these rods standard in the 2.3's. There is a lot of grinding required at the base of the cylinder to get them to clear. I want to see how it all works out and plan to use the Crowers as they go in without any problem with extra clearancing on the bottom of the cylinder.

Yes, I've run the 4.11 before, it was in my RS at one time for the Super Four Challenge with Car and Driver Magazine. Back then I switched back to the stock gear for drag racing and didn't notice any difference in ET/MPH. It's not a drastic change.
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #129  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
The 10.5:1 C.R. will run strictly on Ethanol right? I figure that for a dual-mapped setup(E85/91 octane pump), 10.0:1 might be about optimal.
At 10.5:1, and on 91 octane the effective C.R. would be way high at any boost level much above 16 PSI. Yes or no? I realize that in Ohio you are blessed with 93 octane gasoline, so the knock threshold is a bit higher. However, your white project car will not be dual-mapped anyway, but rather, will be run strictly on E85, so you wouldn't need to plan for 91(or 93) octane.p:

Last edited by sparky; Feb 10, 2009 at 04:18 AM.
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 07:13 AM
  #130  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The fuel here is 93-94 octane just about everywhere. I will also run the car on that fuel, it won't be any problem at all.

I do not agree that at 10.5:1 anything over 16 psi would be too much boost to run on Cali 91 octane. I'm pretty confident 25 psi wouldn't be a problem even on that **** they call fuel.
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 07:25 AM
  #131  
SloRice's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
From: West Chester, OH
More pictArs!!!!
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #132  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Sorry, nothing new yet. Ted is finishing up the cylinder head now and when it's done we will post pics of that.
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #133  
05ah8james's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Sorry, nothing new yet. Ted is finishing up the cylinder head now and when it's done we will post pics of that.
What a tease! I wanna see more. I'm shipping my head to you sometime this week. I cant wait for my 2.3!!!!
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:20 PM
  #134  
Evo_Hustler's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
still waiting for new progress pics! : )
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #135  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
....I do not agree that at 10.5:1 anything over 16 psi would be too much boost to run on Cali 91 octane. I'm pretty confident 25 psi wouldn't be a problem even on that **** they call fuel.
Wow! I want one just like the one that you are building, 10.5:1 and all.


Quick Reply: Buschur Racing begins "Project White" a wicked street build.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 PM.