Buschur Racing begins "Project White" a wicked street build.
#122
#123
Dave,
Are the turbo tuff rods being used for all your standard 2.3ltr builds now and if not, is there any additional charge? These rods are kick ***, imo. Just as Gary Gardella what he thinks of them. He used box stock rods in his car and ran 2 seasons without a freshing up and look at the power that car was making.......incredible....
Are the turbo tuff rods being used for all your standard 2.3ltr builds now and if not, is there any additional charge? These rods are kick ***, imo. Just as Gary Gardella what he thinks of them. He used box stock rods in his car and ran 2 seasons without a freshing up and look at the power that car was making.......incredible....
#124
#125
#126
#128
No, we are not going to use these rods standard in the 2.3's. There is a lot of grinding required at the base of the cylinder to get them to clear. I want to see how it all works out and plan to use the Crowers as they go in without any problem with extra clearancing on the bottom of the cylinder.
Yes, I've run the 4.11 before, it was in my RS at one time for the Super Four Challenge with Car and Driver Magazine. Back then I switched back to the stock gear for drag racing and didn't notice any difference in ET/MPH. It's not a drastic change.
Yes, I've run the 4.11 before, it was in my RS at one time for the Super Four Challenge with Car and Driver Magazine. Back then I switched back to the stock gear for drag racing and didn't notice any difference in ET/MPH. It's not a drastic change.
#129
The 10.5:1 C.R. will run strictly on Ethanol right? I figure that for a dual-mapped setup(E85/91 octane pump), 10.0:1 might be about optimal.
At 10.5:1, and on 91 octane the effective C.R. would be way high at any boost level much above 16 PSI. Yes or no? I realize that in Ohio you are blessed with 93 octane gasoline, so the knock threshold is a bit higher. However, your white project car will not be dual-mapped anyway, but rather, will be run strictly on E85, so you wouldn't need to plan for 91(or 93) octane.p:
At 10.5:1, and on 91 octane the effective C.R. would be way high at any boost level much above 16 PSI. Yes or no? I realize that in Ohio you are blessed with 93 octane gasoline, so the knock threshold is a bit higher. However, your white project car will not be dual-mapped anyway, but rather, will be run strictly on E85, so you wouldn't need to plan for 91(or 93) octane.p:
Last edited by sparky; Feb 10, 2009 at 04:18 AM.
#130
The fuel here is 93-94 octane just about everywhere. I will also run the car on that fuel, it won't be any problem at all.
I do not agree that at 10.5:1 anything over 16 psi would be too much boost to run on Cali 91 octane. I'm pretty confident 25 psi wouldn't be a problem even on that **** they call fuel.
I do not agree that at 10.5:1 anything over 16 psi would be too much boost to run on Cali 91 octane. I'm pretty confident 25 psi wouldn't be a problem even on that **** they call fuel.
#133
#135