--- FP Green 73HTA ---
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
When I went to the track it was on E-75 from the sunrise station, so it wasn't up to the number is my sig because we had to pull some timing on my map but even with that and no undertray, angry Fidanza 3.2 clutch.... I still trapped 129... there's a 130mph pass in it on E-85.
What's the fastest trap anyone's got on the BBK with a full weight car?
What's the fastest trap anyone's got on the BBK with a full weight car?
a 129 trap proves what this turbo can do
#36
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This whole thread has gotten retarded. Still nothing but horrible comparisons to over-hype a turbo that no one has done any solid testing on forcing everyone to make speculations, convert from one dyno to another, and make comparisons that make no sense.
This exact same thing happened when the last green came out.
A 129 trap doesn't prove squat...
This exact same thing happened when the last green came out.
A 129 trap doesn't prove squat...
#37
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am absolutely torn between the two companies but that fact that CBRD doesn't make you wait weeks or possibly months to get your turbo is def giving them the upper hand for me between these two turbos
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
You are correct, cornercarver! 1/4 mile trap speed does not prove much by itself. However, given the total vehicle weight(including driver), along with the trap speed, then you should be able to accurately calculate horsepower. So, worthwhile comparisons could indeed be made. Yes, or no?