Professional and experience input needed. FPred vs. 50-trim.
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Professional and experience input needed. FPred vs. 50-trim.
Ok so my current engine/breathing mod list is as follows:
Ported/blueprinted head
Cosworth M3 camshafts
Ported/coated manifold
LD19 headstuds
Manley valvesprings
HKS EVC VI boost controller
3" turboxs downpipe
hks carbon-ti catback
ARC induction box
DTM 3.5" FMIC
Wahlbro 255 fuel pump
AMS UICP and LICP piping on the way
880cc injectors yet to be installed
hks camgear for exhaust only on the way
I want to mod for now and later and later the only thing that will get done is a cosworth 2.2l stroker. The car is going to be used for road course track days so I'm more worried about area under the curve than I am horsepower. I am between the FpRed and a 50-trim type of turbo because right now my camshafts are moving more air than my turbo can keep up with.
Hp goals: I want to make somewhere between 400whp-450whp on pump gas with the 2.0l setup (if I make a little less than my lowest or a little higher than my highest I won't mind) on a Mustang Dyno with around 25lbs of boost. As mentioned earlier I'd be happy with 370whp as long as it came in at a decent rpm, however I'd be happier with 400whp at 6k rpm with a fairly flat dyno sheet.
Spool: decent tq from 3500-5k and if I get full boost by 4500-4800 rpm I'd be satisfied.
Future: I just want to to work well with my 2.0L and amazing when I go 2.2L.
With these facts which one would you choose? Alcohol/Meth is NOT an option for me. I am willing to run 110 mixed with 93. I would like one that works within my range with 93 though just in case. I am also not willing to use nitrous. If my goals are not possible you can state that as well.
Ported/blueprinted head
Cosworth M3 camshafts
Ported/coated manifold
LD19 headstuds
Manley valvesprings
HKS EVC VI boost controller
3" turboxs downpipe
hks carbon-ti catback
ARC induction box
DTM 3.5" FMIC
Wahlbro 255 fuel pump
AMS UICP and LICP piping on the way
880cc injectors yet to be installed
hks camgear for exhaust only on the way
I want to mod for now and later and later the only thing that will get done is a cosworth 2.2l stroker. The car is going to be used for road course track days so I'm more worried about area under the curve than I am horsepower. I am between the FpRed and a 50-trim type of turbo because right now my camshafts are moving more air than my turbo can keep up with.
Hp goals: I want to make somewhere between 400whp-450whp on pump gas with the 2.0l setup (if I make a little less than my lowest or a little higher than my highest I won't mind) on a Mustang Dyno with around 25lbs of boost. As mentioned earlier I'd be happy with 370whp as long as it came in at a decent rpm, however I'd be happier with 400whp at 6k rpm with a fairly flat dyno sheet.
Spool: decent tq from 3500-5k and if I get full boost by 4500-4800 rpm I'd be satisfied.
Future: I just want to to work well with my 2.0L and amazing when I go 2.2L.
With these facts which one would you choose? Alcohol/Meth is NOT an option for me. I am willing to run 110 mixed with 93. I would like one that works within my range with 93 though just in case. I am also not willing to use nitrous. If my goals are not possible you can state that as well.
Last edited by Boostfiend; Jul 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM.
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The FPRed and 50 trim are somewhat comparable turbos. I currently run a 50 trim with all the trimmin's so-to-speak, and if I had to do it over again, I'd go with an FPRed, as it is the cheaper option and potentially performs slightly better.
l8r)
#6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I'm not mistaken, the FP Red can flow 54 lbs/min while the 50-trim does around 450 lbs/min. Very substantial difference. The Red probably spools even a little quicker than the 50-trim so its win-win. The 50-trim is pretty much obsolete, unless you can find a killer deal on one.
kinda off-topic but be careful with those Cosworth cams. They seem to be having serious quality control issues, even reports of cams snapping in half.
kinda off-topic but be careful with those Cosworth cams. They seem to be having serious quality control issues, even reports of cams snapping in half.
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
I would recommend an FPRed over the 50 trim.
Trending Topics
#12
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
The car is going to be used for road course track days so I'm more worried about area under the curve than I am horsepower. I am between the FpRed and a 50-trim type of turbo because right now my camshafts are moving more air than my turbo can keep up with.....Future: I just want to to work well with my 2.0L and amazing when I go 2.2L.
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless you are planning to mostly run really really short technical tracks, I'd go with something more like a 35R, especially given your stroker plans. The road course is not an autocross. You will nearly always be above 5000 rpm so having power down low isn't nearly as important as top end.
First Choice, Red
Second Choice, HTA 35R (I like the 3586)
Third Choice, PTE 6262 BB
I have a non ported Red and when I upgrade, I will be going with HTA 3586
#14
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, I think what I'll do from the advice above is buy the red for my current setup and then the 35r later. I don't want to make that huge a jump in horsepower from a red to a 35r just yet. I'll get the red and some more seat time to improve the driver, then go all out with 35r and cossie 2.2l stroker. Thanx for all of your help.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris@AMS
Evo X Dyno Results
50
Apr 5, 2011 03:49 PM
Aby@MIL.SPEC
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
15
Mar 20, 2009 12:08 AM