Back pressure to Boost ratio???
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back pressure to Boost ratio???
I am curious on what you guys are getting for back pressure to boost ratio. I would like to know from stock to the insane combination. Please let me know what your set up is like, such as cams, exhaust manifold, turbo, A/R on the turbo, HP. It would be great if you had a dyno graph as well. Thankyou
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
Buschur did....The posts are really really old...Are you trying to figure out what to do and what boost to run ? If so, those have been addressed a billion times as well. If you are just curious what back-pressure data has been recorded with different configurations (somewhat pointless), then you'll have a hard time....G/L
#6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
If my memory serves me you don't want to exceed 1.5:1 exhaust:intake ratio. I had a few buddies in the early 2000's measuring back pressure on Zcars at boost levels of 22psi and they were seeing ~25psi of back pressure before the turbo. I am not sure you can have less back pressure than boost, but perhaps it is?
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
It's not something that really matters to the guy that already has a turbo and doesn't intending on swapping turbos out like they change their underwear.
The guys that are competitive and do measure that kind of stuff aren't going to post it.
You might be able to get it out of companies like FP that do take those measurements for developing consumer products though?
The guys that are competitive and do measure that kind of stuff aren't going to post it.
You might be able to get it out of companies like FP that do take those measurements for developing consumer products though?
Trending Topics
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buschur did....The posts are really really old...Are you trying to figure out what to do and what boost to run ? If so, those have been addressed a billion times as well. If you are just curious what back-pressure data has been recorded with different configurations (somewhat pointless), then you'll have a hard time....G/L
I want to see what turbo they are running and what kind of back pressure they are running. Its a good way to gauge the efficiency of the turbo set up for the motor.
#9
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
check this build out.
http://www.mmc.org.nz/forum/viewtopi...449&highlight=
there is a section in there that talks about the exhaust manifold to boost ratio, talking about how when you start to get higher boost pressure than exhaust manifold pressure, the exhaust manifold starts to work like a NA car and equal long length runners work better.
Cheers, Mike
http://www.mmc.org.nz/forum/viewtopi...449&highlight=
there is a section in there that talks about the exhaust manifold to boost ratio, talking about how when you start to get higher boost pressure than exhaust manifold pressure, the exhaust manifold starts to work like a NA car and equal long length runners work better.
Cheers, Mike
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
check this build out.
http://www.mmc.org.nz/forum/viewtopi...449&highlight=
there is a section in there that talks about the exhaust manifold to boost ratio, talking about how when you start to get higher boost pressure than exhaust manifold pressure, the exhaust manifold starts to work like a NA car and equal long length runners work better.
Cheers, Mike
http://www.mmc.org.nz/forum/viewtopi...449&highlight=
there is a section in there that talks about the exhaust manifold to boost ratio, talking about how when you start to get higher boost pressure than exhaust manifold pressure, the exhaust manifold starts to work like a NA car and equal long length runners work better.
Cheers, Mike
I figured that there will probably not be that mush testing. thank you guys for all the helpful information and links.
#11
Dont know if this is any help, but here are boost/ back pressure /Tq and Bhp curves from my 2.0l dyno run . Pressure readings as absolute pressure
http://www.stcf.net/ProjectX/run3_4.jpg
Turbo holset HX40super, turbine housing #18, EWG 60mm, 272/10.4 Cams
http://www.stcf.net/ProjectX/run3_4.jpg
Turbo holset HX40super, turbine housing #18, EWG 60mm, 272/10.4 Cams
Last edited by vigge; Dec 27, 2009 at 02:41 AM.
#12
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah that does help. Looks like a pretty good combination. It seems to breath real well in the lower rpm's with quick spool, yet still retains good torque all the way to 7500. I will guess past 7,5000 that the turbo has run out of air.
#13
Spool on that log is a somewhat delayd compared to road runs due to the rapid inertia dyno sweep. Turbo was previously with #14 housing, spool 200-300rpm lower, but "died" out as as much sooner in high end also.
On road spool 4th gear with 14 housing, in two different abient temps
http://www.stcf.net/ProjectX/spoolia_14pesalla.jpg
3rd gear
http://www.stcf.net/ProjectX/spoolia_14pesalla_3.jpg
18 housing curves with 200-300rpm off-set to above
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dynotech Tuning
Vendor Announcements
32
Mar 28, 2024 01:54 PM
KingTal0n
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Nov 27, 2016 05:23 PM