Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.
View Poll Results: Interested in a front LSD for US Evo 8?
Yes, I would be interested in a front LSD
57
86.36%
No, Who needs it
9
13.64%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Interested in a front LSD for US Evo 8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 01:27 PM
  #1  
erikgj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
Interested in a front LSD for US Evo 8?

Interested in a front LSD for US Evo 8?

Who would be interested in a front LSD for the USDM Evo 8? So far there is not one available that fits the USDM Evo. If there is enough interest maybe one of the LSD manufacturers will start making one.

Erikgj
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
Kinmar_X's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
im pretty sure cusco makes one for a non ACD evolution.
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 02:37 PM
  #3  
osunick's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Yes but the transfer case housing is still different on the USDM model. Why? I wish I knew...
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 05:11 PM
  #4  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
CUSCO doesn't make a LSD for the EVO VIII with no ACD/AYC.
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:23 AM
  #5  
EVO Rosso's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
I just voted and 31 were yes and 7 were no. I wonder is Cusco is listening?
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (185)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
we are already on the case with Cusco, actually started talking about it a few months ago but its a process - it will take time, but hopefully they will offer something for us.
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #7  
aaronyoung's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: baltimore
i'd call quaife,
you don't want to have to service a clutch type diff in that trans.

regards,
aaron
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 06:34 PM
  #8  
Chris in HB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: No VA
Someone posted a while back that Quaife won't be making a front diff for the Evo...
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 07:24 AM
  #9  
Hooptie157's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Northern Jersey
Originally posted by aaronyoung
i'd call quaife,
you don't want to have to service a clutch type diff in that trans.

regards,
aaron
I hate when they put words in people's mouth's. Maybe just maybe I wouldn't care about the extra maintance and get the LSD. Some people do choose performance over convience ya know.
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 11:47 PM
  #10  
aaronyoung's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: baltimore
Originally posted by Hooptie157


I hate when they put words in people's mouth's. Maybe just maybe I wouldn't care about the extra maintance and get the LSD. Some people do choose performance over convience ya know.
Take it easy, i'm not trying to put words in others mouths.

The helical diffs do have serious advantages over clutch type diffs in the long term.

niose and service are 2 major factors to atleast be considered before jumping in to what diff to chose for your application.

No offence ment, each to his or her own.

aaron
Old Oct 18, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #11  
erikgj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
Originally posted by aaronyoung


Take it easy, i'm not trying to put words in others mouths.

The helical diffs do have serious advantages over clutch type diffs in the long term.

niose and service are 2 major factors to atleast be considered before jumping in to what diff to chose for your application.

No offence ment, each to his or her own.

aaron
I would choose a helical/Torsen front diff myself. I was really hoping that Mitsubishi would make one an option on the 2004 Evo's.

Last edited by erikgj; Oct 18, 2003 at 08:20 PM.
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 02:03 AM
  #12  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally posted by erikgj


I would choose a helical/Torsen front diff myself. I was really hoping that Mitsubishi would make one an option on the 2004 Evo's.
I prefer a clutch type for the simple fact that the helical is ONLY effective under acceleration. The clutch type set up in a 1.5 configuration will not have the "spooky" handling characteristics of a helical at the limits under changing load.

Keith
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 08:00 AM
  #13  
aaronyoung's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: baltimore
A valid point there four door (being able to set up a clutch type diff from 1.5 to 2 way). For the straight up hard core racer this could make or breaks the decision.

For the average racer, who would like to take his car out on the street every once in a while, a clutch type diff "might" not be what they are looking for.

I had a clutch diff in a previous car. I followed the recommended break in procedure. It was loud as hell in low speed turns (CLUNK, CLUNK, CLUNK). When I contacted the manufacture they said the noise was normal.
There was noticeably lower transfer after 60k miles of use also.
It however worked MUCH better than the viscous diff it replaced.

While 60k miles might sound like allot of laps around the track for a racer it "might" seem very different for those who are week end racers and double their car as daily drivers.

Best bet is to contact the manufacture and ask about things like rebuild cost, noise, and life span.

They are both great diffs and much better than the crappy open diff that mitsu should not have given us in the first place. Either would be an upgrade and noticeable difference in performance.

In time the available selection will be there. Keep at it guys weather you think so or not manufactures will listen to your repeated request.

aaron
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #14  
chronohunter's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Co.
Originally posted by Fourdoor


I prefer a clutch type for the simple fact that the helical is ONLY effective under acceleration. The clutch type set up in a 1.5 configuration will not have the "spooky" handling characteristics of a helical at the limits under changing load.

Keith
that's exactly what I want, a one-way (either clutch or helical)
spooky=less understeer, under trailing throttle/trail braking corner entry to mid-corner. As Aaron stated "to each his own"

Also when wondering if if the clutch type will last in the front, remember we have on in the rear already
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #15  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
For a track car, clutch type is the way to go... for the street, I would not run one if I had the choice. Another benifit of Quaife is their product has a life time warranty... INCLUDING RACING! If you can break it, they replace it. I've not heard of one needing replacing yet. So, it will out last your car. If a minimum 20 run order were placed, Quaife will build a dif for about anything.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 PM.