Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2010 Borg Warner Airwerks Turbo catalog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2010, 11:27 AM
  #496  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Ludikraut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by n2oiroc
Am i reading that correctly? 717lb/ft at the wheels on a 2.2 and 300lb/ft by 4,100rpm?
I believe those numbers include a ~1.2 correction factor.

Would like to see the 8374 graph with better cams. Looks like it makes good power, but, at least in the graph posted, it's not spooling as fast as I was hoping it would.

l8r)
Old Nov 18, 2010, 11:43 AM
  #497  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
omniprobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: hometown cali
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
9180 on the 2.2 is starting to make power 1.5k rpms sooner than my 6765 on a 2.0. Take out the .2 liter and it's still insane.

I wonder if the recirculation of the dump tubes help?
Old Nov 18, 2010, 02:18 PM
  #498  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
38six's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by omniprobe
9180 on the 2.2 is starting to make power 1.5k rpms sooner than my 6765 on a 2.0. Take out the .2 liter and it's still insane.

I wonder if the recirculation of the dump tubes help?

Last edited by 38six; Nov 18, 2010 at 02:24 PM.
Old Nov 18, 2010, 10:26 PM
  #499  
Evolving Member
 
Talonboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redmond Washington
Posts: 490
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm, that comparison looks funny, it looks like the 8374 was running at higher boost than the 9180 through most of the rev range. Come to think of it, if they were both setup to make 31.9 psi boost at 8500rpm, the smaller turbo would almost have to be running at higher boost lower in the rev range in order to be at the same boost at 8500, because it probably would have some fall-off.
Anyway, in this comparison it looks like the car would be actually faster with the 8374. But if they had set the test up for equal peak boost, the bigger turbo would probably look better. That's my guess.
Old Nov 18, 2010, 10:26 PM
  #500  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
R/TErnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WAR EAGLE!
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wow... seriously a game changer. I want one sooo bad.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:45 AM
  #501  
Newbie
 
ndisgii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First, does anyone know for sure what motor displacement is in the Sierra Sierra car?

Second, can someone post up some dyno sheets of 6765 or 6768 cars with similar motors in here so we can compare?

Thanks!
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:48 AM
  #502  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
n2oiroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: milwaukee, wi
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ndisgii
First, does anyone know for sure what motor displacement is in the Sierra Sierra car?

Second, can someone post up some dyno sheets of 6765 or 6768 cars with similar motors in here so we can compare?

Thanks!
Its an 86x94 4g63.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:54 AM
  #503  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
2.2L - 10% larger than a std 2.0L
Old Nov 19, 2010, 09:49 AM
  #504  
Newbie
 
ndisgii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know of any 2.2liter dyno charts using 6765 or 6768 to compare? Heck, any size motor with those turbos would be nice to see.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 10:42 AM
  #505  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
R/TErnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WAR EAGLE!
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Hit up Jeremy aka FatFab
I think the AWD guys have some dyno sheets floating around
Also probably hit up Patrick B. (i think its a 6262)
I think the ETS guys are running the 67mm on their X for a good comparison.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 11:19 AM
  #506  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
tscompusa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pa
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
wow where are the updated dyno sheets with the other cams? its crazy how fast it spools up and hits torque so early even with a huge turbo
Old Nov 19, 2010, 11:33 AM
  #507  
Newbie
 
Mr.warchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: So*cal
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn I want this turbo....It's time to sell my New Gt35r turbo anyone interested 408.338.8774
Old Nov 19, 2010, 12:37 PM
  #508  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by ndisgii
Anyone know of any 2.2liter dyno charts using 6765 or 6768 to compare?
I feel you'll be hard pressed to find any 700+whp turbo delivering 220whp (on any dyno) by 4000 rpm with a 2.2L 4G63. My twinscroll T4 comes within about 10% of that figure with my setup, but I'm not going to get 700+whp out of it.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 02:23 PM
  #509  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Philthy748's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can't wait to get my hands on my 9180 and do a direct comparison to my 4088R which has been working very well on my 2.3...
Old Nov 20, 2010, 05:31 AM
  #510  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
omniprobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: hometown cali
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ted B
I feel you'll be hard pressed to find any 700+whp turbo delivering 220whp (on any dyno) by 4000 rpm with a 2.2L 4G63. My twinscroll T4 comes within about 10% of that figure with my setup, but I'm not going to get 700+whp out of it.
Ted B has spoken, now time to sell our arms and legs for one.


Quick Reply: 2010 Borg Warner Airwerks Turbo catalog



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:02 PM.