JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Only the potential to stall easier, but the reduction in weight allows sustained rpm and in most cases higher total rpm. I would counter the stall problem associated with a really light rotating assembly with a heavier flywheel.

giangi

Many thanks, i did not think about a heavier flywheel, but it's a great idea, it really makes sense.....

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Okay, so despite my declaration of no more logs here is the log at 794whp/561 ft lbs.-



enjoy

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

New pumpgas numbers-

cij911

iTrader: (14)

Nice job Aaron....that must be a blast to drive....

migs647

iTrader: (19)

Showoff ...





GJ man

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Its where I normally run it on E85 and less boost so its nice to have it back with 92 octane. I am gonna put it back on E now though, I want to go back to 30psi and 720whp

Erik@MIL.SPEC

iTrader: (94)

Those are silly pumpgas numbers. Congrats.

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

I'm thinking its about time to do a back to back test on the dyno with my current stock TB and your 65mm. I have been a combo of WAY busy with the shop and projects and too lazy to work on my own when I do have the free time.

R/TErnie

iTrader: (32)

Aaron I have the 65mm available to test on your car. I've been meaning to throw my car on the dyno and test the difference... maybe we can do that on Thursday on my way down south :0

Erik@MIL.SPEC

iTrader: (94)

I like that idea. A lot

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Word, what time?

aaron

BLKCarbonEVO

iTrader: (2)

650 pump is pretty nice man! Congrats

Mikey

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

thanks

3gEclipseTurbo

iTrader: (12)

still on stock ingnition or did you go back to a COP?