largest bore in a 4g63......86.5?
#5
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
It is not recommended since the cylinder wall would be very thin and likely to crack, you run the same risk with 86mm but it has been done before. You can always sonic check your block for core shift to get an idea how thick your cylinder walls are. On a block .060 overbore i would suggest a full fill as well not something i would drive everyday for a long distance.
#6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
If nothing else it would be the last time for that block assuming it did work. After 86.5 its straight done. That being said several piston manufacturers have part numbers for 86.5mm pistons. IF you are doing it just to get more displacement I would do a 4G69/G9CS or a 4G64/G4CS with your stock crank.
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: miami
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what TTP said.
Yes, I have one right now ready to drop in an engine bay complete with Manley I-Beams to 1000hp, JE Pistons, ACL Race bearings, ready to go.
__________________
Originally Posted by bertune
You've done this before? 86.5? With an evo block?
You've done this before? 86.5? With an evo block?
__________________
Trending Topics
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: miami
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not recommended since the cylinder wall would be very thin and likely to crack, you run the same risk with 86mm but it has been done before. You can always sonic check your block for core shift to get an idea how thick your cylinder walls are. On a block .060 overbore i would suggest a full fill as well not something i would drive everyday for a long distance.
#11
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Its hard to say what power is "safe" relative to bore size. Preignition is what will kill it, crack the block and its all over. We have seen blocks crack at 85mm, 85.5mm, solid filled blocks, 86.5-87mm 4G64s. All it takes is preignition, a meth failure of some kind, hydraulicking a piston, and you can (and we have) lose a block at 520whp. We have made 1100+ and been fine and then seen issues at 900.
Is it common, no. Does it happen? Yes.
Is it common, no. Does it happen? Yes.
#13
Maybe we can help you out a little better if you let us know your plans? DD/Track? Boost level? HP Goals? max RPM? Did you mess up your block? Power gains are going to be minimal from a .060 overbore compared to a .020 overbore. Questions for TTP Was there any bore distortion on the .060 overbore(ring sealing)? are these wet blocks? What is the cylinder wall thickness on average with the 86.5 bore 4g63?
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: miami
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question is......Anybody ever used 86.5mm pistons in a 4g63? And if so, at what power level? TTP said they have done this up to 700whp, anybody else? I know most do not recommend this but what makes them say 86mm is as far as u should go? Have they tried 86.5? Do they know how much meat is left on the sleeve? Or are they just guessing?
#15
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: bucks county p.a
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe we can help you out a little better if you let us know your plans? DD/Track? Boost level? HP Goals? max RPM? Did you mess up your block? Power gains are going to be minimal from a .060 overbore compared to a .020 overbore. Questions for TTP Was there any bore distortion on the .060 overbore(ring sealing)? are these wet blocks? What is the cylinder wall thickness on average with the 86.5 bore 4g63?