o2 dumps vs smaller diameter TBE?
#1
o2 dumps vs smaller diameter TBE?
Did searching but couldnt find a suitible thread for this particular scenerio.
Running o2 dumps allows exhaust to bypass the main exhaust stream and dump into the atmosphere. But how much exhaust flow is actually dumped?
What I'm trying to find out is, how big of a diameter turboback exhaust system do we need to run an o2 dump that would equal out to running a 3" system?
So for example would the following hold true power and spool.
Dump style o2 housing & 2.5" TBE >= 3" TBE & recirculating o2
or
Dump style o2 housing & 2.75 TBE >= 3" TBE & recirculating o2
smaller or larger tbe etc.....
Oh and since this could depend on many different variables and turbos, lets keep it for stock framed turbo upgrades up to 550 whp mustang dyno. (Stock IX turbo....HTAGreen.....BBK/BBK-B....FPRed/Black)
Main point is to possibly build a more quieter exhaust that sounds a little different but not care too much about WOT.
I know there are electric dumps etc... out there. Dont care too much about those. DO NOT MENTION THEM HERE.
Running o2 dumps allows exhaust to bypass the main exhaust stream and dump into the atmosphere. But how much exhaust flow is actually dumped?
What I'm trying to find out is, how big of a diameter turboback exhaust system do we need to run an o2 dump that would equal out to running a 3" system?
So for example would the following hold true power and spool.
Dump style o2 housing & 2.5" TBE >= 3" TBE & recirculating o2
or
Dump style o2 housing & 2.75 TBE >= 3" TBE & recirculating o2
smaller or larger tbe etc.....
Oh and since this could depend on many different variables and turbos, lets keep it for stock framed turbo upgrades up to 550 whp mustang dyno. (Stock IX turbo....HTAGreen.....BBK/BBK-B....FPRed/Black)
Main point is to possibly build a more quieter exhaust that sounds a little different but not care too much about WOT.
I know there are electric dumps etc... out there. Dont care too much about those. DO NOT MENTION THEM HERE.
#3
Tanabe
Cobb
RRE stealth
Jun BL
2 Buschur exhausts I've modified in the past.
Current Buschur magnaflow + hfc
The RRE was not quiet like people say it to be. Maybe the muffler packing was already burnt out but it was on the loud side for my taste.
Lets just keep it on topic...
#4
You're missing the main point of a 3" TBE, which is to limit the backpressure created by a more restrictive setup such as the stock exhaust. Regardless of an O2 dump or not, a 3" free flowing TBE will be beneficial in a turbocharged application. The only reason that I can see for running a smaller diameter exhaust would be to either meet the needs of a particular racing body or to manipulate the turbo's powerband. Secondly, the only currently available stock frame turbo that will meet your specification of 550whp on a mustang dyno would be an FP Black realistically unless you feel like pushing a Red beyond the limits of everyday practicability. Third, the best way to meet your requirements of a quieter exhaust except at WOT would be to incorporate either a different muffler or add an additional resonator to your existing setup. To figure out the exact size of the exhaust needed to compensate for the addition of an O2 dump would require you to specify which turbo you will be running and from there finding its flow rate at a given pressure that you will be testing it at and then factoring in the orifice diameter of the wastegate opening and the amount of pressure that it would be able to expel...or something like that.
#7
You're missing the main point of a 3" TBE, which is to limit the backpressure created by a more restrictive setup such as the stock exhaust. Regardless of an O2 dump or not, a 3" free flowing TBE will be beneficial in a turbocharged application. The only reason that I can see for running a smaller diameter exhaust would be to either meet the needs of a particular racing body or to manipulate the turbo's powerband. Secondly, the only currently available stock frame turbo that will meet your specification of 550whp on a mustang dyno would be an FP Black realistically unless you feel like pushing a Red beyond the limits of everyday practicability. Third, the best way to meet your requirements of a quieter exhaust except at WOT would be to incorporate either a different muffler or add an additional resonator to your existing setup. To figure out the exact size of the exhaust needed to compensate for the addition of an O2 dump would require you to specify which turbo you will be running and from there finding its flow rate at a given pressure that you will be testing it at and then factoring in the orifice diameter of the wastegate opening and the amount of pressure that it would be able to expel...or something like that.
The 550 whp is just a max random number doesnt really need to be any where close to it. Just for the record I would probably be going after the BBK full. So 400-450 would be more of the target I am shooting for in the long run.
Larger doesnt always mean better: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...s-hp-tq-5.html
Dang I hate adding anything good here anymore but this is an intersting subject that I've done tons of testing on.
In 2003 we did exhaust testing, hard to even find it now. First we did the axle back, car gained power, then we did the downpipe, car gained no power, then we did an offroad pipe, car gained more power, then we put the stock downpipe back on and lost power, put the new downpipe back on, gained power. The only part left ont the car stock was the stock mid pipe between the cat and the muffler. We had built everything out of 2.5" mandrel bent tubing up to that point. I don't remember how much power the car was making at the time, over 300 on our old Dynojet I'd guess. Then we replaced that one last section of stock turbing with a 2.5" section and the car made some rediculous gains in power, I am thinking over 20 whp. The factory resonators are VERY restrictive.
We then of course built our 3" system, tested it against the 2.5" and stock. The 3" worked the best throughout the entire RPM range. The 2.5" vs 3" downpipe made no difference in power then, I'd say the power levels then were under 400 whp the last testing we did on 2.5" vs 3" downpipes.
Flash forward to about 2 years ago. I had the lighest 3.5" tubing with minimal bends in it bent up for a 3.5" turbo back system to market. I built one for my car, the Bad Bish, put it all together using V-band connections and a Burns super lightweight racing muffler. Loaded the car on the dyno and dyno'd the car back to back VS our 3" turbo back with our bullet muffler. The car was over 600 whp on our Mustang Dyno at the time. The results? 3" had more low/mid and the same or better top end. I could not believe it. I had all those exhausts left at our shop until about 6 months ago when I traded them to another shop looking to build some. I built one for Al's GT42r car, one for Matt's GT42r car and sold the one I built for my car.
To add even more to this. I think it was this spring when I decided that my 700 whp car was just too loud and I was sick of listening to it. The car had run (most of you know this already) 9.0 at 159.6 mph through our standard 3" turbo back with the bullet muffler. I found a small diameter lightweight muffler that I wanted to try to run in the rear. My car runs our Bullet muffler in the center where the cat goes because of the JDM EVO9 rear bumper cover, I don't like to see a big muffler back there. This new muffler I found was very small in diameter, we named it the SD muffler (small diameter). I kept the bullet in the center and added the SD muffler to the rear, it took a bunch of the noise out of the exhaust. Anyway, the car was on the dyno, never unstrapped. I made a couple of pulls with the car that were in the 69x whp ran and then we swapped on the SD, the power went to 700.
Some of what I have seen makes no sense but the dyno doesn't lie and you can gauranfkingtee that if I am testing stuff like this for my own use and my own car there is no BS being pulled, I want my car to be as fast as it can be. To this day I run our complete 3" turbo back, bullet in the center and SD in the rear. The car has made 710 whp like that now on our dyno.
My car also runs a 44 mm Tial external gate that of course dumps some exhaust out the front of the car under boost, definetely beneficial. The odd thing with this is the stock style 02 housings that do the same thing...........I've seen nothing but losses from.
Maybe Myth busters need to buy a dyno. haha
In 2003 we did exhaust testing, hard to even find it now. First we did the axle back, car gained power, then we did the downpipe, car gained no power, then we did an offroad pipe, car gained more power, then we put the stock downpipe back on and lost power, put the new downpipe back on, gained power. The only part left ont the car stock was the stock mid pipe between the cat and the muffler. We had built everything out of 2.5" mandrel bent tubing up to that point. I don't remember how much power the car was making at the time, over 300 on our old Dynojet I'd guess. Then we replaced that one last section of stock turbing with a 2.5" section and the car made some rediculous gains in power, I am thinking over 20 whp. The factory resonators are VERY restrictive.
We then of course built our 3" system, tested it against the 2.5" and stock. The 3" worked the best throughout the entire RPM range. The 2.5" vs 3" downpipe made no difference in power then, I'd say the power levels then were under 400 whp the last testing we did on 2.5" vs 3" downpipes.
Flash forward to about 2 years ago. I had the lighest 3.5" tubing with minimal bends in it bent up for a 3.5" turbo back system to market. I built one for my car, the Bad Bish, put it all together using V-band connections and a Burns super lightweight racing muffler. Loaded the car on the dyno and dyno'd the car back to back VS our 3" turbo back with our bullet muffler. The car was over 600 whp on our Mustang Dyno at the time. The results? 3" had more low/mid and the same or better top end. I could not believe it. I had all those exhausts left at our shop until about 6 months ago when I traded them to another shop looking to build some. I built one for Al's GT42r car, one for Matt's GT42r car and sold the one I built for my car.
To add even more to this. I think it was this spring when I decided that my 700 whp car was just too loud and I was sick of listening to it. The car had run (most of you know this already) 9.0 at 159.6 mph through our standard 3" turbo back with the bullet muffler. I found a small diameter lightweight muffler that I wanted to try to run in the rear. My car runs our Bullet muffler in the center where the cat goes because of the JDM EVO9 rear bumper cover, I don't like to see a big muffler back there. This new muffler I found was very small in diameter, we named it the SD muffler (small diameter). I kept the bullet in the center and added the SD muffler to the rear, it took a bunch of the noise out of the exhaust. Anyway, the car was on the dyno, never unstrapped. I made a couple of pulls with the car that were in the 69x whp ran and then we swapped on the SD, the power went to 700.
Some of what I have seen makes no sense but the dyno doesn't lie and you can gauranfkingtee that if I am testing stuff like this for my own use and my own car there is no BS being pulled, I want my car to be as fast as it can be. To this day I run our complete 3" turbo back, bullet in the center and SD in the rear. The car has made 710 whp like that now on our dyno.
My car also runs a 44 mm Tial external gate that of course dumps some exhaust out the front of the car under boost, definetely beneficial. The odd thing with this is the stock style 02 housings that do the same thing...........I've seen nothing but losses from.
Maybe Myth busters need to buy a dyno. haha
Only thing that I am curious about his 2.5" to 3" tests where if they were down with internal recirculation or dump? I'm guessing internal recirculation since an o2 dump was not available for us at that time and he probably didnt make one also.
Now traditionally stock framed turbos mostly run internally gated o2 housings that squeeze our of a 2.5" o2 housing and into a 3" TBE. Well with an o2 dump a lot of the exhaust pressure is reduced when dumping to the atmosphere and you still have an 2.5" exit on the o2. But how much exhaust pressure is relieved from the main exhaust flow? And what sort of exhaust tubing comparison could we make? Example dump relieves XX% = like gaingin 1/4" in diameter etc...
Last edited by BluEVOIX; Feb 19, 2010 at 08:06 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Does any one know how much does a dump really relieve exhaust or back pressure by?
I'm thinking an exhaust dump is about 1.25" in diameter. But it doesnt necessarily mean that 3" - 1.25" = 1.75" is all thats needed.
So just guessing out of thin air, .25" - .5" of tubing diameter loss in the main stream should be the amount the dump would be relieving?
Any one have any equations on this just to help out with a base start. I know that possibly on paper and reality are going to be slightly different. And to narrow it down, lets keep the train of thought on stock frame turbo's only if need be flow rate ranges of bbk turbo - Red turbo area .
I'm going to try and see what I can find out from some side research. All constructive thoughts related to the topic are( positive or negative) are welcome for discussion.
I'm thinking an exhaust dump is about 1.25" in diameter. But it doesnt necessarily mean that 3" - 1.25" = 1.75" is all thats needed.
So just guessing out of thin air, .25" - .5" of tubing diameter loss in the main stream should be the amount the dump would be relieving?
Any one have any equations on this just to help out with a base start. I know that possibly on paper and reality are going to be slightly different. And to narrow it down, lets keep the train of thought on stock frame turbo's only if need be flow rate ranges of bbk turbo - Red turbo area .
I'm going to try and see what I can find out from some side research. All constructive thoughts related to the topic are( positive or negative) are welcome for discussion.
Last edited by BluEVOIX; Feb 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM.
#9
on smaller turbo's it really isnt much. and increasing tubing diameter just one step adds a lot of volume to the exhaust.
2" = 3.14 sq in
2.5" = 4.90 sq in
3" = 7.07 s in
3.5" = 9.62 sq in
4" = 12.56 sq in
2" = 3.14 sq in
2.5" = 4.90 sq in
3" = 7.07 s in
3.5" = 9.62 sq in
4" = 12.56 sq in
#10
Your question depends on which turbocharger you are running and how much boost pressure/mass airflow you are running. The closer the turbo's compressor is to being maxed out, the less exhaust is dumped to the wastegate. For example, I am maxing out my stock turbo, so very little exhaust is being bypassed. However, if you are running nowhere close to the max of the particular turbo, much more exhaust has to be bypassed through the wastegate.
Also, as far as math is concerned, if you want know how much a 1.25" dump tube is in area compared to a 3" exhaust tube, it's simply Pi*radius squared.
1.25" dump tube = 1.23 square inches
3" exhaust = 7.07 square inches
Also, as far as math is concerned, if you want know how much a 1.25" dump tube is in area compared to a 3" exhaust tube, it's simply Pi*radius squared.
1.25" dump tube = 1.23 square inches
3" exhaust = 7.07 square inches
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Illumin8
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
31
Feb 28, 2013 10:58 AM
_EVOlved_
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
12
Jul 13, 2010 09:44 AM