Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Kelford 272's vs FP-4R's on a IX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2010, 01:51 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Kelford 272's vs FP-4R's on a IX

Im planning on doing an FP Black, or more likely a Red, and I currently have HKS 272's. Im going to be swapping the HKS's out for the Kelfords or the FP-4R's and revving to about 7800-7900rpm on the stock block and head. Or to 8500rpm if I do a built Buschur head, yet still on the stock block.

How do the FP-4R's make their power, are they a mid-range cam and fall off up top or is it relatively smooth all the way up? Im pretty sure the general consensus is that the Kelfords make a sick amount of top end power.
From what Ive heard so far, the FP cams suit a IX (mivec) better than the Kelfords, which typically enjoy working in a VIII better, is this accurate? I've also read about phantom knock issues with Kelfords in a IX.

It seems like the obvious thing would be to do the FP cams since I am getting an FP turbo...but Im a bit stuck on my decision. Id appreciate any further guidance in making a selection!
Old Mar 20, 2010, 02:52 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Old Mar 20, 2010, 02:56 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Draven83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VA or NY
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
look up the ams cam test. its on here somewhere
Old Mar 20, 2010, 03:22 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
EriCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Draven83
look up the ams cam test. its on here somewhere
Has absoulutely no relevance. The AMS cam test is for viii's only! Honestly those two choices and the s2's are going to perform similiar and I personally don't think your gonna be able to tell the difference anyway.
Old Mar 20, 2010, 04:52 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
o-townFLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: FLA-HI-SoCal
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here are my mods with Cosworth M2 272 cams on a FP Red... road course track tune on 100 octane, 26psi...




Engine/Drivetrain Modifications:
-TUNING TECHNOLOGIES dyno tune
-MIL.SPEC 65mm Throttle Body
-MIL.SPEC ported turbo hot-side
-MIL.SPEC R2 version Intake Manifold
-MIL.SPEC ported Exhaust Manifold
-MIL.SPEC ported Invidia o2 housing
-MIL.SPEC 100 cell catalyic conveter
-PROSPORT oil filter adaptor plate
-MISHIMOTO radiator
-MISHIMOTO air diversion plate
-MISHIMOTO silicone radiator hoses
-MISHIMOTO slim fan
-MISHIMOTO thermostat
-AMSOIL fluids
-Synapse Syncronic BOV
-Cosworth 272 M2 camshafts
-ETS 3inch front mount intercooler
-ETS 2.5inch lower IC pipe
-Gruppe-S 3-port solenoid
-Dual map switch for 91/100
-Brian Crower springs and titanium retainers
-AEM short-ram intake
-Megan 3inch TBE
-Walbro 255lph fuel pump
-Precision Turbo Engine 780cc fuel injectors
-ACT heavy duty clutch
-ACT Streetlite flywheel
-ARP head studs
-Road Race Engineering front motor mount
-42 draftdesigns water temp housing
-SUN Auto Hyper Grounding kit
-SUN Auto Hyper Voltage type MR
Old Mar 20, 2010, 04:53 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ya and the AMS cam test was done on a built motor with an AEM EMS and a few other tidbits. Im tryin to figure out whatll work best on an FP turbo.
Old Mar 20, 2010, 04:55 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
 
EVO_MERLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL / Norfolk, VA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love my S2's, but i do not have a FP turbo....YET!
Old Mar 20, 2010, 09:11 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
aka.ralliart15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gator Nation(UF)
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Love my Kelfords on my Red, although I see good things from the S2's...we'll never really know unless there's a test done.
Old Mar 20, 2010, 09:15 PM
  #9  
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
kikeixmr1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Svendiesel
Im planning on doing an FP Black, or more likely a Red, and I currently have HKS 272's. Im going to be swapping the HKS's out for the Kelfords or the FP-4R's and revving to about 7800-7900rpm on the stock block and head. Or to 8500rpm if I do a built Buschur head, yet still on the stock block.

How do the FP-4R's make their power, are they a mid-range cam and fall off up top or is it relatively smooth all the way up? Im pretty sure the general consensus is that the Kelfords make a sick amount of top end power.
From what Ive heard so far, the FP cams suit a IX (mivec) better than the Kelfords, which typically enjoy working in a VIII better, is this accurate? I've also read about phantom knock issues with Kelfords in a IX.

It seems like the obvious thing would be to do the FP cams since I am getting an FP turbo...but Im a bit stuck on my decision. Id appreciate any further guidance in making a selection!
i will do m3 cosworth if i was u for sure u will love then.
Old Mar 20, 2010, 09:38 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
esevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^ My Cosworth M3 Intake cam just broke today at a road race event. The cam broke at the oiling holes. There is a design flaw...

Evan Smith
Old Mar 21, 2010, 07:31 AM
  #11  
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Paintballer81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cali. Stationed in NC
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M3s FTL... that seems to be a common problem with them.

from what i have seen S2s> kelford 272s in a 9.

Last edited by Paintballer81; Mar 21, 2010 at 11:16 AM.
Old Mar 21, 2010, 08:03 AM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
FathouseFab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ran fp4r on my last setup ( stock turbo and 35r) and they ran great, made good power and times for the parts on the car.

Fp5rs are in my car now.

FP FTW!

Fathouse
Old Mar 21, 2010, 11:10 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Fathouse
I ran fp4r on my last setup ( stock turbo and 35r) and they ran great, made good power and times for the parts on the car.

Fp5rs are in my car now.

FP FTW!

Fathouse
Hmm, so tell me, what differences do you see between the 4R's and 5R's? The 5R is a cam that makes more top end? Where did the 4R's make their power?

Ok so after reading about the 5R's on FP's site it confirmed what I figured, that the 5R's are a top end power maker. How were the 4R's though?

Last edited by Svendiesel; Mar 21, 2010 at 11:16 PM.
Old Mar 22, 2010, 07:14 AM
  #14  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
FathouseFab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just put the engine in over the weekend wit hthe 5r's so no reports as of yet.

The 4r's where great, picked up alot of midrange with the stock turbo, not a ton up top, but the turbo was just out of steam, the car went low 11's@122-123 with the stock evo9 gearing winding out 4th.

On the 35r, the car hit real hard, and pulled past 8500 with no problems. Went low 10's on stock engine, head, maf, ecu etc.

Fathouse
Old Mar 22, 2010, 07:22 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
erald01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
honestly GSC or HKS have always been proven to be reliable and EVERYONE that has run them have nothing but good things to say.


Quick Reply: Kelford 272's vs FP-4R's on a IX



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.