Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Thermal Spacers, do they work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2010 | 11:18 PM
  #16  
xRoguex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 11
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by kane.s2k
They begin to deform and melt over time. Mine did on 2 cars. I will never use them again.
Another problem with them.

All that money --- and no gain.

But you do get - persistent boost leaks and the eventual complete deterioration and loss of sealing..
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #17  
MitsuOZ's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: chicago
i was going to buy one anyway, the reason is 3 or 4 degree's cooler, 1 less count of knock, 1 extra psi of boost = Powa!
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #18  
DeMoNz's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by 3gEclipseTurbo
Do theraml spacers for the intake manifold and throttle body increase hp? Or are they just another bs part that just seems logical but dont show any gains in performance?
i put outlaw engineering spacers on my 4th gen eclipse and i loved them! i actually buttdynoed some hp on the top end. but i did have a short ram intake, shorty headers and a catback exhaust

great mod! im surprised im the only one who seemed to have a good experience with them. but i guess you guys are all turbo lol

http://www.outlawengineering.com/mitsu6g72frame.html

on a 3g Eclipse GT: RESULTS: maximum gain 6.4 whp and 9.5 ft-lbs of torque.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #19  
SWOLN's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 13
From: In the Florida Swamps
We did a direct comparison on the runners of my buddies Nissan SR20det motor. Each runner on his car was 40 degrees cooler. Measured with one of those thermal reading guns... I can get the exact readings if neccessary.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #20  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
i have one on my car but i don't have IATs before and after. I also removed my EGR, not sure if other who haven't seen gains have. EGR might be heating up the intake mani before a pull, not sure.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #21  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
For the discussion between Itune and Rouge. I think your both right in a way.

First, Itune is from hondas. All motor hondas need ever lil HP they can get. I believe on those application that this IM gaskets may make HP and are not that much of a hassle.

Now for Rouge's side, on a boosted car, I dont think it matters much. First, like rouge mention, we have boost and those type of IM gaskets have been know to leak. Also, on a turbo charged setup like we have, there is a lot of heat generated and I dont think the IM gasket helps much. Most likely it will melt, like mentioned. And in turbo world, we can make a lot of HP gain out of one cam/turbo change and dont think the small gain (if any) from the IM gasket is worth it.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #22  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
Mine has been on my car for about 70k or so. No leaks whatsoever. IM went from too hot to touch to being able to hold my hand on it with no issue.

Not sure on any HP pick up but mine has not melted, EGR hole is not pluged, and all EGR stuff remains in tact for now. I have the Hondata one I think I paid 40.00 for it.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 02:40 PM
  #23  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
You are correct, to a certain extent. While i am from the Honda world originally, most of my tuning experience was with turbocharged/supercharged Honda engines. I was one of the first to ever turbo a k20a2 rsx-s engine, i did R&D for GReddy and tuned/did R&D for Hondata. I also helped develop the Hondata k-pro standalone ECU and tested many of Hondata's heatsheild products on several vehicles, including the RSX, TSX, TL, to name a few, 95% of which were not naturally aspirated. I always saw a reduction in intake manifold temps, which always lead to increased power.

In a turbo charged engine, you will not have a vaccum in the intake manifold, under boost(obviously). Under boost, this means that intake charge air is sitting in the manifold as long, if not longer than if the manifold was in vacuum. Heat is going to be transferred into the charge air, as it's forced into the intake plenum/runners and awaits entrance into the combustion chamber.

Look at it this way, if this science was not correct, why do tuners place bags of ice on the intake manifolds when looking for big numbers on the dyno? If this made no difference on turboed engines, then how do you explain the increase in power?

Oh yeah, i have never seen a intake spacer fail..btw. Not even on a EGR enabled Evo.

Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
For the discussion between Itune and Rouge. I think your both right in a way.

First, Itune is from hondas. All motor hondas need ever lil HP they can get. I believe on those application that this IM gaskets may make HP and are not that much of a hassle.

Now for Rouge's side, on a boosted car, I dont think it matters much. First, like rouge mention, we have boost and those type of IM gaskets have been know to leak. Also, on a turbo charged setup like we have, there is a lot of heat generated and I dont think the IM gasket helps much. Most likely it will melt, like mentioned. And in turbo world, we can make a lot of HP gain out of one cam/turbo change and dont think the small gain (if any) from the IM gasket is worth it.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:06 PM
  #24  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by iTune
You are correct, to a certain extent. While i am from the Honda world originally, most of my tuning experience was with turbocharged/supercharged Honda engines. I was one of the first to ever turbo a k20a2 rsx-s engine, i did R&D for GReddy and tuned/did R&D for Hondata. I also helped develop the Hondata k-pro standalone ECU and tested many of Hondata's heatsheild products on several vehicles, including the RSX, TSX, TL, to name a few, 95% of which were not naturally aspirated. I always saw a reduction in intake manifold temps, which always lead to increased power.

In a turbo charged engine, you will not have a vaccum in the intake manifold, under boost(obviously). Under boost, this means that intake charge air is sitting in the manifold as long, if not longer than if the manifold was in vacuum. Heat is going to be transferred into the charge air, as it's forced into the intake plenum/runners and awaits entrance into the combustion chamber.

Look at it this way, if this science was not correct, why do tuners place bags of ice on the intake manifolds when looking for big numbers on the dyno? If this made no difference on turboed engines, then how do you explain the increase in power?

Oh yeah, i have never seen a intake spacer fail..btw. Not even on a EGR enabled Evo.
Okay. I didnt really wanna dive that much into it. Was just commenting, trying to keep both sides happy

Ps since we're bragging (just playing ), I was supercharging/turbocharging hondas before there were K series, RSXs and TSXs.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #25  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
Okay. I didnt really wanna dive that much into it. Was just commenting, trying to keep both sides happy

Ps since we're bragging (just playing ), I was supercharging/turbocharging hondas before there were K series, RSXs and TSXs.
Trust me...my post was not a dig on you. I just felt, that if my experience was called into question, that it should be known who i am.

I was around before the k-series as well. I just became known for my work on the k-series engines.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #26  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by iTune
Trust me...my post was not a dig on you. I just felt, that if my experience was called into question, that it should be known who i am.

I was around before the k-series as well. I just became known for my work on the k-series engines.
I know i was just playing around. For some reason Im on a humor, fun tip today.

I didnt get to play with the K series, got into AWD turbo cars.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #27  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
I know i was just playing around. For some reason Im on a humor, fun tip today.

I didnt get to play with the K series, got into AWD turbo cars.
No worries brobot.

While i do miss certain things about Hondas. I never looked back.....

AWD, turbocharged FTMFW.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #28  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by iTune
No worries brobot.

While i do miss certain things about Hondas. I never looked back.....

AWD, turbocharged FTMFW.
Brobot?? What? LOL
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #29  
VQChris's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: NYC
The plenum spacers are big in the Nissan community. One of the best mods for VQ Motors.
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #30  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by IGetItPoppin
The plenum spacers are big in the Nissan community. One of the best mods for VQ Motors.
Yeah, but thats because they make the plenum bigger and help the two cylinder in the front breath better. Lil bit different then the thermal spacer but yeah..



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:24 PM.