The weirdest build yet?
#31
I'm wishing to become pregnant and trade the offspring (and afterbirth) to N/A my evo as soon as you sort out all the bugs and come out with the bolt-on kit.
(also willing to trade for a Yugo in reasonable condition with a new spare tire in the engine bay)
(also willing to trade for a Yugo in reasonable condition with a new spare tire in the engine bay)
#32
#37
#38
Well actually, it'd be a combination of both. Gear/wheel/engine/etc inertia is based on acceleration and would be % based and differ in each gear, but drag would be more of a nominal value. Which one has more merit? Don't know
Just playing devils advocate though
#42
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 75
From: Northwest
Lack of MIVEC in this case I think. I didnt have enough time to make cam gear changes on the dyno between our two shop Hondas we had to tune for BOTI this weekend. The 110* centerline of the S2s, while great when used in a turbo motor, needed tightened up some in this car. The torque dip looks bad but when you look at the horsepower its simply not gaining. The other thing I am wondering about is the intake manifold and header. The idea was to test this somewhat and see what we could do with what we had. The "bench race committee" had thought that we might be able to double whatever this did. I do not see it being economically feasible.
If someone lacked the coefficients and had an Evo for a Rally car (an odd choice really if they lacked the ability to race it in Open) you could do this to pick up the needed coefficients in regional events and then convert it back.
If someone lacked the coefficients and had an Evo for a Rally car (an odd choice really if they lacked the ability to race it in Open) you could do this to pick up the needed coefficients in regional events and then convert it back.
#44