Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What's your opinion on cams with stock turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2010, 08:53 PM
  #31  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
btleier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have HKS 272's on my car. With them made over 400/400 on a dynojet at 26psi on my stock 9.8 turbo. Pretty happy with the results, but I have plans to upgrade turbos and do a full t3 kit so will eventually go to the s2's. If I was just doing it once I'd go the GSC route.
Old Nov 5, 2010, 09:51 PM
  #32  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
tscompusa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pa
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Jimbolution
im asking myself the same question... my choice is Kelford 272's but how is it going to do with stock turbo (waiting for FP RED).... i hope some will answer, it will help me too
kelford 272 due quite well with stock turbo 8/9. no loss in spoolup, and more power uptop. Kelfords are known to cause excessive valvetrain noise and create phantom knock though.. keep that in mind when tuning with them
Old Nov 5, 2010, 09:51 PM
  #33  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
tscompusa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pa
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by btleier
I have HKS 272's on my car. With them made over 400/400 on a dynojet at 26psi on my stock 9.8 turbo. Pretty happy with the results, but I have plans to upgrade turbos and do a full t3 kit so will eventually go to the s2's. If I was just doing it once I'd go the GSC route.
the hks's are mild and your numbers are great. id be happy if i was you also.
Old Nov 5, 2010, 09:59 PM
  #34  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hypnotiq9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
listen I have an 04 evo VIII with the original 8 hotside turbo kelford 272's and 80k on the clock and the kelfords really pick up the power and feel awesome on the stocker....It keeps pulling at that high rpm instead of falling on its face....Mine pulled all the way up to over 180 mph (thats what my buddy in the CTS-V said we were doing at the end)
Old Nov 6, 2010, 01:39 AM
  #35  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
adam_79_2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by JorgeYaHeard
Like the title says I'm looking to get some camshafts for my baby (2003 Evo 8). Current mod list:
K&N cone filter
3inch TBE w/ test pipe
boost gauge
manual boost controller
2.5 lower icp
ETS 3" front mount
Walbro 255lph
innovate lc-1.

I have spoken with several reputable tuners, and their answers are all radically different. Here are their suggestions: HKS 272's, Kelford 272's, GSC S1's, and AWD Motorsports 272. That being said I have decided to hear what my fellow enthusiast opinions are...

I have a evo 9 with kelford 272 with my 1st tune and stock turbo i put 364hp but i guarenttee with a 50/50 water meth 400hp is achievable on a stock turbo, stock turbo, little lag = alot of serious quick power
Old Nov 6, 2010, 06:44 AM
  #36  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
JorgeYaHeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard from one of the tuners I've been in contact with that Kelfords have been known to break, although I haven't seen any info to support that on here. I have also heard of the run of GSC that broke.

It is a tough decision for me as I don't want to be disappointed with a weak mild camshaft, on the other hand saving some money by sticking with stock valve springs allows me to buy other mods such as ported manifold and o2 housing, which will continue to support my stock turbo as well as future mods.
Old Nov 6, 2010, 06:59 AM
  #37  
Newbie
iTrader: (16)
 
KarmaSRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: ****sburg
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kelford 272 best
Old Nov 6, 2010, 07:29 AM
  #38  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Jimbolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rimouski
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KarmaSRT
Kelford 272 best
yeah Kelford 272/272 and GSC 2 are my two favorites and it's tough to choose one

even on the dyno test chart, they look almost the same... be or not to be
Old Nov 6, 2010, 07:47 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
4xforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: norcal
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I thought this debate had been settled for the most part a while back. FP4R's if you don't want to do springs and GSC S2's if you do springs. Even with the S'2s it's only a recommendation that you upgrade the springs. With all the threads and discussions in the dyno section using the above mentioned cams the information is there and proven that they don't lose any noticeable spool or power down low. Just gains.
Old Nov 6, 2010, 08:05 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
binky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut / Massachusetts U.S.A
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
That was a single batch a long time ago... yes is was an oiling groove cut to deep I think. It was a prob for a few companies not just GSC becuase a few places use the same cores.

You should really look into the S2s, not Kelford. But hey, people are going to do what they want.

Mikey
Any reason S2's over Kelford's?

In the AMS cam test the Kelford's really shined.

STM also made good power on Shawna's car with the Kelford's.

That's why I was looking at the Kelford's.


-Bink

Last edited by binky; Nov 6, 2010 at 03:20 PM.
Old Nov 6, 2010, 08:21 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
LGshow19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about Buschur 272s? Thought those are suppose to be one of the best cams out...
Old Nov 6, 2010, 09:14 AM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
BlkcarbonEVO, how do you know the GSCs are the best? Sounds like you had to have tested all of them out there to come up with that conclusion.

That said, look at the specs on the FP4R and the GSC S2s. Damn near identical on the cam cards... I'd be surprised if they made any different power.
Old Nov 6, 2010, 04:24 PM
  #43  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
JorgeYaHeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that a whole bunch of people would recommend Kelford's regardless of turbo! Is this the general consensus?
Old Nov 7, 2010, 12:57 PM
  #44  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joemflsxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: S. FL
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FP4R's! I'm on the stock turbo, ARP Headstuds, Buschur IC + LICP, Walbro 255, Intake, TBE, tuned on 93 octane by Derek at AWD Motorsports. I made considerably more power when compared to the large amount of dyno sheets/reviews of similar set ups with different cams.

I will say I lost a little bottom end and the idle could be rough for some individuals taste, but overall I am extremely happy with the FP4R's.
Old Nov 7, 2010, 04:22 PM
  #45  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
JorgeYaHeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Joemflsxe
FP4R's! I'm on the stock turbo, ARP Headstuds, Buschur IC + LICP, Walbro 255, Intake, TBE, tuned on 93 octane by Derek at AWD Motorsports. I made considerably more power when compared to the large amount of dyno sheets/reviews of similar set ups with different cams.

I will say I lost a little bottom end and the idle could be rough for some individuals taste, but overall I am extremely happy with the FP4R's.

What did you make for power? What boost level?


Quick Reply: What's your opinion on cams with stock turbo?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:46 PM.