493 whp at 22-24psi
Dec 3, 2003, 09:25 AM
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RnR Racing
The numbers were done on a AWD dyno dynamics. So are numbers are even a little more impressive than some of the others shop because we use a AWD dyno for our numbers where it has even more drivetrain loss.
The numbers were done on a AWD dyno dynamics. So are numbers are even a little more impressive than some of the others shop because we use a AWD dyno for our numbers where it has even more drivetrain loss.
Are you sure the dyno operator (at Pan, I presume) is not using the Shoot-Out program (which changes test conditions and estimates crank hp) to display the results? Because the Stage 1-3 results in your sig are really high as far as Dyno Dynamics Dynos wheel hp go. On DD dyno, it should only take 250-260whp to get an EVO to run low 12s at 110-112mph trap speeds, not 380whp.
shiv
Dec 3, 2003, 01:46 PM
#32
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I am completly positive it is using the correct info. We both know how to use the dyno correctly. All the stock EVos' they dyno will only put out about 210whp stock. I believe the most they have had a stock EVO dyno is 218whp.
Dec 3, 2003, 02:21 PM
#34
Originally posted by matt55
3300 lbs car with 490ish flywheel hp should run 11.0 @124 in da 1/4 ,and 380 flywheel hp should get you 11.95@114mph in da 1/4. Not whp! Sounds like some of your # are lil off?
3300 lbs car with 490ish flywheel hp should run 11.0 @124 in da 1/4 ,and 380 flywheel hp should get you 11.95@114mph in da 1/4. Not whp! Sounds like some of your # are lil off?
Dec 3, 2003, 04:51 PM
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Deeetroit
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by slowTsi
I was under the impression that all of the new stuff falls into the GTxxR nomenclature. That is what i was trying to say. But from what you are saying is that you can just get a new GT35 and it's not duall bb unless you get the GT35R. I knew you could a typical t3/t4 with the GT35 wheels but i didn't think it would still have the gt compressor cover. Am i correct?
I was under the impression that all of the new stuff falls into the GTxxR nomenclature. That is what i was trying to say. But from what you are saying is that you can just get a new GT35 and it's not duall bb unless you get the GT35R. I knew you could a typical t3/t4 with the GT35 wheels but i didn't think it would still have the gt compressor cover. Am i correct?
Dec 3, 2003, 04:52 PM
#38
In Timeout
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Penn State University
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For gods sake, why does this seem unusual. All the tuners who try to over-engineer things and put out wild theories are suprised. These cars have been running low elevens on stock engines for awhile. If I'm correct AMS ran a 10.9 on a stock engine in a VR-4. (They also made 525whp on the stock evo engine)
Dec 3, 2003, 05:49 PM
#39
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We will see. Our car defintely isn't lightweight.
I am expecting mid 11's from it. It's not like I can make pass after pass until I get a good run in. A good run would be a low 11, but that isn't going to happen as our track is strict and will kick me after the 1st 11 sec pass.
Hopefully nothing will break.
I am expecting mid 11's from it. It's not like I can make pass after pass until I get a good run in. A good run would be a low 11, but that isn't going to happen as our track is strict and will kick me after the 1st 11 sec pass.
Hopefully nothing will break.
Dec 3, 2003, 06:07 PM
#42
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya, that is the part that sucks. I run one 11 sec pass and then it's all over.
We will just have to rent the track for a day so ti's not a problem.
Al, made 570whp and ran 11.5 at 121 so I am not expecting the best numbers right now.
We still have a 2.25" downpipe on the car so it doesn't spool the best between shifts until I fix that.
We will just have to rent the track for a day so ti's not a problem.
Al, made 570whp and ran 11.5 at 121 so I am not expecting the best numbers right now.
We still have a 2.25" downpipe on the car so it doesn't spool the best between shifts until I fix that.
Dec 4, 2003, 05:34 AM
#43
Guys, what's the big friggin deal about putting a simple roll bar in the car? If you have the means of bringing a kit like this to market, I think you can put a cage/simple bar in the car just to meet requirements of the track. And I'm sure if you think for a few minutes, you'll see where you can hide mounting points so you can bolt in and bolt out when needed.
Yeah, it's dead weight, but if all you're after is that little white receipt, I'd say it's a small price to pay for selling a proven 10 second turbo kit.
Yeah, it's dead weight, but if all you're after is that little white receipt, I'd say it's a small price to pay for selling a proven 10 second turbo kit.
Dec 4, 2003, 07:11 AM
#44
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ft. Laud, FL
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
roll cage
Originally posted by 4G63>OOOO
Guys, what's the big friggin deal about putting a simple roll bar in the car?
Guys, what's the big friggin deal about putting a simple roll bar in the car?
Dec 4, 2003, 08:36 AM
#45
Newbie
Join Date: May 2003
Location: pa/nj (montvale)
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why dont you guys utilize a cage using chromoly steel? Its great advantages over steel cages is def. important @ the track. When I build mine for my 97 mirage for scca road rally...I saved a bunch of pounds. I even went as far as using higher tensile strenght/light weight fill rod for my tig welds. BTW great news about the kit...I cant wait until the new timeslips comes in. 