Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Hta3586 vs pte 6765

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2010, 11:48 AM
  #46  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
n2oiroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: milwaukee, wi
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Migsubishi
This guy isn't getting it people, let him learn from his own mistakes...

HTA86 - 62mm turbo hurting people with Precision 6765 - 67mm turbo....

HTA3794 - 67mm turbo hurting people with Precision 6765 - 67mm turbo.... oh and spools alot faster...

It's clear this guy isn't looking for a fast car but instead a high number which the 3794 will give him but he seems to not get it or not like the price tag of the HTA stuff...

GL man in whatever you chose, hope it does what you need it to.

I'm done here.
come on, who wouldnt give up 150 whp in the midrange to gain 25 whp at redline?
Old Dec 24, 2010, 12:07 PM
  #47  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Creamo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
6765! I made 815awhp 38psi e85 2.0l only reving to 8500. Easily made that power! And stock compression. Timing wasn't even messed with yet.
What sort of timing are you running if it wasn't messed with? 0 degrees advance across the board?
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:14 PM
  #48  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
 
Dragking2189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Migsubishi
This guy isn't getting it people, let him learn from his own mistakes...

HTA86 - 62mm turbo hurting people with Precision 6765 - 67mm turbo....

HTA3794 - 67mm turbo hurting people with Precision 6765 - 67mm turbo.... oh and spools alot faster...

It's clear this guy isn't looking for a fast car but instead a high number which the 3794 will give him but he seems to not get it or not like the price tag of the HTA stuff...

GL man in whatever you chose, hope it does what you need it to.

I'm done here.
you're right I dont know whicn turbo is best , why do you think I started this thread ? I'm doing lots of research I want to buy the best turbo apparently people have different opinions . I just sit here and read what people who actually run these turbo have to say .
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:24 PM
  #49  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
 
1NastyMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6262 Is nice for the price difference compared to the 3586. If your gonna spend that kind of $ on a brand new turbo the 3794 will make 800+ and only 100-150$ more then the 3586 which you need to max / run big boost compared to way less on 3794 but you sacrife spool since its a 67mm
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:28 PM
  #50  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
 
Dragking2189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 1NastyMR
6262 Is nice for the price difference compared to the 3586. If your gonna spend that kind of $ on a brand new turbo the 3794 will make 800+ and only 100-150$ more then the 3586 which you need to max / run big boost compared to way less on 3794 but you sacrife spool since its a 67mm
thanks for the advice , been reading about the 3794 turbo and it's pretty bad ***
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:47 PM
  #51  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: harrisburg, pa.
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3794 10:1 compression, aluminum rods, awd mix e85

this is also forward facing, ported stock intake manifold, cop, ported by awd 3794 not off the shelf! 46psi
Attached Thumbnails Hta3586 vs pte 6765-awd-3794-dyno.jpg  

Last edited by Pizzamangtr; Dec 24, 2010 at 02:03 PM. Reason: forgot
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:59 PM
  #52  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: harrisburg, pa.
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6765 stock compression, steel rods, 38psi

buschur fabricated manifold, ets equal length manifold, recirc wastegate, pump e70/e85, stock plug wires, okada coil packs, s3 cams
Attached Thumbnails Hta3586 vs pte 6765-will-815-dyno.jpg  
Old Dec 24, 2010, 02:10 PM
  #53  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: harrisburg, pa.
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Creamo3
What sort of timing are you running if it wasn't messed with? 0 degrees advance across the board?
it was a base map made to get the car running. E-spec was doing boost first and only reving to 8500 cause thier was no sense reving it out until we were at the higher boost level, which we ran into a fueling issue where it started to go lean and fuel pressure was dropping. Idc was only 72% so probally pumps couldnt keep up. Pump problem is being taken car of by buschur, no dw300 for this guy!
Old Jan 2, 2011, 01:16 AM
  #54  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
AlphaKennyBody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Westside Cali
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update?
Old Jan 2, 2011, 09:09 AM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
this is also forward facing, ported stock intake manifold, cop, ported by awd 3794 not off the shelf! 46psi
Didn't they make more power and go faster on a 6765?
Old Jan 2, 2011, 11:00 AM
  #56  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Migsubishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa bay area
Posts: 1,491
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Colt4g63
Didn't they make more power and go faster on a 6765?
Your compairing a more average docile set up to a full blown race car on kill, a simple search might have helped

Originally Posted by AWD Motorsports
From what i have seen on our more mild Mivec setup it will make more power than 6765.. It made more lb for lb already.. So i would say on kill mode it will make more..

Mike
Originally Posted by whitepwr
Yah they made that on much higher boost and a much more aggressive setup. This turbo will outperform the 6765, the only reason theyd even do it is just to show by how much it beats the 6765. Lol this one only made 19hp less.. Throw like 2more psi at it and there you go, youve matched their highest dyno for a 6765.

Originally Posted by AWD Motorsports
Id say its very similar to the 6765.. Power is right there but combination is much different.. Honestly think this turbo may possibly make more on an equal setup to what our black car had..

Mike
Originally Posted by AWD Motorsports
I believe it spools the same nearly & may make more power as well on equal setups.. 1 fact i do know that I like is it doesnt drop boost on top.. it makes 46psi and holds it.. the 6765 billet didnt hold boost as well..

Mike
Originally Posted by AWD Motorsports
No completely different.. This one is Mivec, small cams, stock intake manifold ported, 2.5 piping not 3", lower compression.. if had this turbo on my kill setup 950 all day..

Mike
FP HTA3794 FTMFW All Day!
Old Jan 2, 2011, 05:35 PM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Colt4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Albany, IN
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ahh. I honestly don't read into a lot on here so wasn't sure on all the details.
Old Jan 3, 2011, 06:05 AM
  #58  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: harrisburg, pa.
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine had no trouble holding boost at all! 6765! Maybe their was another problem! I hold the record at Cbrd of any car ever dynoed there with the 6765!
Old Jan 3, 2011, 07:02 AM
  #59  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
s.e.a.n.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,293
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Dragking2189
I see the 3586 will make high 700's but that's pushing it to it's limits. In the other hand, 6765 will make 800 without pushing it sounds like we have a winner here
Let me break it down for you JP. If you want a good powerband go with the HTA if your want peak power go with the 67.

Its not that hard to figure out. In my opinion powerband > peak power
Old Jan 4, 2011, 08:17 AM
  #60  
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
X91EVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am in deciding stage between the too also

but is the hta37 available in t4?

Last edited by X91EVO; Jan 4, 2011 at 08:19 AM.


Quick Reply: Hta3586 vs pte 6765



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:20 AM.