Hta3586 vs pte 6765
Jan 4, 2011, 08:41 AM
#61
It makes little sense to contend with a shorter powerband and slower spool, unless a larger turbo is made to do something the smaller turbo positively cannot do. Unless the larger turbo is generating significantly greater power, it is at a disadvantage when the rubber hits the road.
The HTA3586 has powered amazingly quick and fast track times, not because it's the largest turbo or delivers the greatest peak power on dyno sheets.
FYI
The HTA3586 has powered amazingly quick and fast track times, not because it's the largest turbo or delivers the greatest peak power on dyno sheets.
FYI
Jan 4, 2011, 08:16 PM
#62
It makes little sense to contend with a shorter powerband and slower spool, unless a larger turbo is made to do something the smaller turbo positively cannot do. Unless the larger turbo is generating significantly greater power, it is at a disadvantage when the rubber hits the road.
The HTA3586 has powered amazingly quick and fast track times, not because it's the largest turbo or delivers the greatest peak power on dyno sheets.
FYI
The HTA3586 has powered amazingly quick and fast track times, not because it's the largest turbo or delivers the greatest peak power on dyno sheets.
FYI
Jan 4, 2011, 10:28 PM
#68
So are you implying that 800+whp and 9000+rpm keeps the engine 'happy'?
You are expressing concern about pushing a turbo, when at the same time you're talking about pushing the limits of an engine that costs several times as much as a turbo, and is at least as likely to suffer a failure under those conditions.
A larger turbo doesn't necessarily make the car go faster (not without more rpm potential anyway), isn't any 'safer', but does spool slower. I'm pointing this out for your benefit, not mine.
That's all I have to offer on this topic.
You are expressing concern about pushing a turbo, when at the same time you're talking about pushing the limits of an engine that costs several times as much as a turbo, and is at least as likely to suffer a failure under those conditions.
A larger turbo doesn't necessarily make the car go faster (not without more rpm potential anyway), isn't any 'safer', but does spool slower. I'm pointing this out for your benefit, not mine.
That's all I have to offer on this topic.
Jan 4, 2011, 10:34 PM
#69
So are you implying that 800+whp and 9000+rpm keeps the engine 'happy'?
You are expressing concern about pushing a turbo, when at the same time you're talking about pushing the limits of an engine that costs several times as much as a turbo, and is at least as likely to suffer a failure under those conditions.
A larger turbo doesn't necessarily make the car go faster (not without more rpm potential anyway), isn't any 'safer', but does spool slower. I'm pointing this out for your benefit, not mine.
That's all I have to offer on this topic.
You are expressing concern about pushing a turbo, when at the same time you're talking about pushing the limits of an engine that costs several times as much as a turbo, and is at least as likely to suffer a failure under those conditions.
A larger turbo doesn't necessarily make the car go faster (not without more rpm potential anyway), isn't any 'safer', but does spool slower. I'm pointing this out for your benefit, not mine.
That's all I have to offer on this topic.
Boost is 10x easier on an engine than RPM.. Id rather run 60psi at 8k RPM than 40psi @ 9500.. Youll need to rev your car to use the 6765 and hta3794..
HTA86 still til this day is what 99.9% of anyone on here can use for t3 turbos.. I am yet to see anyone run anything close to what a 6765 can run.. which is 8.75
..Mike
Jan 4, 2011, 10:35 PM
#70
Oh and 1 other thing.. Dont be SHOCKED to see the car struggle to break 800hp @ 40-45psi on 6765.. if the combination is not right i have watched cars struggle with 6765 to touch 800.. Dont go off the 900+ you see from our cars dyno sheets.. 
Mike
Mike
