New BW EFR Turbo Thread
#2341
240Z, I am still fascinated by the virtual dyno post here comparing the GTX3076 and GTX3576.
What I am looking at again is the hp curves are pretty much right on each other at everything below 4400 rpm. I wonder if this is how the car actually felt when you drove it. I mean, it looks like the 3076 had no advantage in the lower part of the rev range. Was that also your driving impression?
Also, what turbine housings did you use on these turbos?
What I am looking at again is the hp curves are pretty much right on each other at everything below 4400 rpm. I wonder if this is how the car actually felt when you drove it. I mean, it looks like the 3076 had no advantage in the lower part of the rev range. Was that also your driving impression?
Also, what turbine housings did you use on these turbos?
There was no difference in spool and the only thing you felt was additional pull on the topend. When I spoke with the Garrett engineers about upgrading they recommended that I try the larger turbine wheel first. Based on results they had seen from an EVO X (GTX3076r vs GTX3576r) they lost no spool and gained 40whp up top. I was somewhat skeptical, but obviousy my results confirmed that as well. My intent is to redyno the new setup in the next 2 weeks and I expect to see over 500hp@wheels on 93 octane and hopefully full boost (33psi) in 3rd gear by 4K rpm.
New Setup Changes:
-Curt Brown 10:1 2L (no balance shafts)
-Bosch P100-T COPs (dwell set for 90mJ)
#2343
Just RT/Ernie's top mount 1.05 that I can think of for the 7670. A 0.92 divided is going to be too small (read spool fast) for making good power out the top before backpressure becomes an issue. The 1.05 was on the border as far as that goes.
aaron
aaron
#2345
I am going to amend my prior statement that the 0.92 is too small. I have been told that it is actually VERY responsive which I dont discount at all. I will have to do some testing to see what the backpressure is at a given boost level before I make a statement about it hurting power
aaron
aaron
#2347
Anyone using/used a smaller-than 7670 EFR unit?
I am building a new VIII engine, 2.2 on pump 98oct, and am after lightning fast spool and power. Have seen the 7670 charts, great unit ;-), but I think a step smaller would be the best here!
I am building a new VIII engine, 2.2 on pump 98oct, and am after lightning fast spool and power. Have seen the 7670 charts, great unit ;-), but I think a step smaller would be the best here!
Last edited by adrianojp; Feb 7, 2013 at 03:03 PM.
#2348
Google for EFR dyno Perrin Performance. Jeff Perrin does a cool comparison of the 7163 against everything
#2349
Thank you, and cheers for you beautiful and competent build!
#2350
Here is a video I put together for a customer using the new Contour+2 camera's.
Video overlay using the GPS data in the video - It can give us lap times, speed and track position.
He's using EFR 8374 with IWG, approx 550whp with 28psi and E85. Very reliable 2.0 4G63.
Video overlay using the GPS data in the video - It can give us lap times, speed and track position.
He's using EFR 8374 with IWG, approx 550whp with 28psi and E85. Very reliable 2.0 4G63.
#2352
l8r)
#2353
Can you make it show tach instead of speedo?
Darn those Porsches get in the way!
#2355
Does he run dysump or wet sump?
Here is a video I put together for a customer using the new Contour+2 camera's.
Video overlay using the GPS data in the video - It can give us lap times, speed and track position.
He's using EFR 8374 with IWG, approx 550whp with 28psi and E85. Very reliable 2.0 4G63.
http://youtu.be/s9TLXY3jq_Y
Video overlay using the GPS data in the video - It can give us lap times, speed and track position.
He's using EFR 8374 with IWG, approx 550whp with 28psi and E85. Very reliable 2.0 4G63.
http://youtu.be/s9TLXY3jq_Y