Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New BW EFR Turbo Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 04:03 AM
  #3361  
black E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 33
From: Boca Raton FL
Originally Posted by mrfred
Now long is your intake pipe? The collapse of the elbow clearly shows that significant vacuum is being generated.
Originally Posted by mrfred
That's waaay too long. One of the biggest single mod gains I ever saw on a friend's Evo 10 was when I switched out a 3" x 30+" long intake pipe for a 3.5" x 18" intake pipe. +35 whp with no change to the tune.

I went back a actually measured all the intake and from filter to turbo inlet its 22".
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 06:43 AM
  #3362  
x622's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
I've found that the Amsoil filters are the best and relatively inexpensive. They also have the most flow for the best filtration according to data.

The best part when you think about all this are all the mid-frame turbo Subaru guys with the rubber inlet pipe. I have to wonder if it crushes down like that too.
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 04:35 PM
  #3363  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by x622
The best part when you think about all this are all the mid-frame turbo Subaru guys with the rubber inlet pipe. I have to wonder if it crushes down like that too.
Hopefully the OEM rubber intake pipes are ribbed enough to keep them from collapsing from a little vacuum. It looks like the rubber elbow in this video is not ribbed at all - so it would be ok for pressure but not for vacuum. Yeah, metal intake pipes FTW!

Very cool video Black E thanks for posting! You would get a good laugh from what a K&N tech support person told me about pressure drop across one of their air filters at full rated flow. He told me 1.5 inches of water. I said, "do you mean 1.5 inches of mercury?" He said no, it's 1.5 inches of water. (1.5 inches of water is .054 psi) Pretty funny. It could be feet of water, but not inches.

Last edited by Talonboost; Sep 15, 2015 at 04:42 PM.
Old Sep 16, 2015 | 06:29 AM
  #3364  
hispanicpanic's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 719
Likes: 11
From: san antonio
Originally Posted by Talonboost
Hopefully the OEM rubber intake pipes are ribbed enough to keep them from collapsing from a little vacuum. It looks like the rubber elbow in this video is not ribbed at all - so it would be ok for pressure but not for vacuum. Yeah, metal intake pipes FTW!

Very cool video Black E thanks for posting! You would get a good laugh from what a K&N tech support person told me about pressure drop across one of their air filters at full rated flow. He told me 1.5 inches of water. I said, "do you mean 1.5 inches of mercury?" He said no, it's 1.5 inches of water. (1.5 inches of water is .054 psi) Pretty funny. It could be feet of water, but not inches.
ribbed for BlackE's pleasure
Old Sep 16, 2015 | 12:56 PM
  #3365  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by hispanicpanic
ribbed for BlackE's pleasure
No video required for that one.
Old Sep 16, 2015 | 02:35 PM
  #3366  
gsxwingz's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
BW EFR9174 2.1L Bottom mount small runners A/C compatible

New personal results to date. Strapped the evo on the Dyno at at BMR's Dyno day last Friday for 3-pulls. Temperature in the dyno room was 107 degrees. Started with 38PSI then 40PSI and finished with 862/626 whp/wtq @42PSI.

Last setup was 2.3L (12.5:1 CR) with PTE6467 and car made 835/656 whp/wtq @44PSI.

The build: Wingz 2.1LR (2.4 block, R&R alum 156mm rods and Wiseco 1400HD 10.5:1 86.5mm, stock 88m crank knife edged; assembly fully balanced running race shaft); head fully ported and polished with 1mm os valves and S3 cams; Full-Race small runner bottom mount T4 divided with BW EFR9174 turbo. Kit was designed to keep your AC. This is so far Full-Race's highest hp setup with AC intact.
Enjoy!













Old Sep 16, 2015 | 08:14 PM
  #3367  
black E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 33
From: Boca Raton FL
What turbine housing are you running on that 9174?
Old Sep 17, 2015 | 05:16 AM
  #3368  
hispanicpanic's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 719
Likes: 11
From: san antonio
Jesus christ that power curve! What was your opinion running 12.5 CR?? How did you like turning up the boost on it?? I'm debating a 11.5 or 12:1 CR for a future engine build, but i won't be using aluminum rods.
Old Sep 17, 2015 | 09:02 AM
  #3369  
x622's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
So you're the guy that Geoff was talking about in my thread;

http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/1130...-build-thread/

Why is the boost threshold so high compared to other cars?

Examples;
A 9174 on a 9:1 civic with the .92AR IWG housing at 18 psi



Black E's 9180 .92 AR IWG 10.1:1



Byproduct of the 1.45 housing I'm assuming you're running? Dyno load generation not being the same since it's a roller vs a dynapack? It being hot as hell here in Phoenix?


Curious what you think is the culprit, especially with such high CR
Old Sep 17, 2015 | 10:47 AM
  #3370  
EVOFans's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 187
Likes: 25
From: KL, Malaysia
Originally Posted by gsxwingz
New personal results to date. Strapped the evo on the Dyno at at BMR's Dyno day last Friday for 3-pulls. Temperature in the dyno room was 107 degrees. Started with 38PSI then 40PSI and finished with 862/626 whp/wtq @42PSI.

Last setup was 2.3L (12.5:1 CR) with PTE6467 and car made 835/656 whp/wtq @44PSI.

The build: Wingz 2.1LR (2.4 block, R&R alum 156mm rods and Wiseco 1400HD 10.5:1 86.5mm, stock 88m crank knife edged; assembly fully balanced running race shaft); head fully ported and polished with 1mm os valves and S3 cams; Full-Race small runner bottom mount T4 divided with BW EFR9174 turbo. Kit was designed to keep your AC. This is so far Full-Race's highest hp setup with AC intact.
Enjoy!













Possible to show us uncorrected result?
Old Sep 17, 2015 | 01:53 PM
  #3371  
Grimgrak's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 16
From: Panama
I was told that having a bend in the rad hose is better than straight.
Any idea the Part # on that rad hose?
Originally Posted by gsxwingz



Old Sep 17, 2015 | 02:57 PM
  #3372  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by grimgrak
i was told that having a bend in the rad hose is better than straight.
Any idea the part # on that rad hose?
+1
Old Sep 18, 2015 | 10:18 PM
  #3373  
gsxwingz's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
My last setup was 12.5:1 on a 2.3L. This setup is 2.1L is only 10.5:1. The dyno room temp was 107 degrees. I am using the 1.45 AR housing. I was not measuring back pressure so couldn't tell you. The turbo speed was 107-108K RPMs. You can see the video of the turbo data on Full-Race's FB page from dyno day.

I'll get the upper radiator hose part number for you guys.




EFR9174 Small runners uncorrected dyno numbers

Last edited by gsxwingz; Sep 18, 2015 at 10:23 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 08:27 AM
  #3374  
EvocentriK's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 500
Likes: 2
From: Australia
My evo X Final Edition lands december, and these EFR's look tasty

Exhaust housing technical talk aside, does anyone have actual 7163 data on a stock block 4B11 (or even 4G63)? 93/E85? All I can see is a heap of TTRS 2.5L audi spam and one graph from Chad on CBRD's website which looks very underwhelming in terms of spool and bottom end. Promises of additional data/dynos have not been delivered yet.

I was at full boost (~26psi) by ~3800 on my BBK Full on stock block 4G, and 3650 on BBK Lite, the full even felt a little slow in the hills out of corners but was great once up and going. The RBX kit with the 7163 looks like it spools slower than an FP Red on 4B11, the graph below from CBRD shows it not even at full boost (only 26.5psi) by 4698rpm... not what I was hoping for for my application. But in another post, Chad says the 7163 gave up only <400rpm spool vs a BBX Lite? Really need some more data, because the only graph I've seen does not support that claim, these things look lazy down low, but do make good top end numbers.

Name:  rbx%20on%20stock%20evo%20x_zps0xfwmdnq.png
Views: 0
Size:  1.18 MB

Last edited by EvocentriK; Sep 20, 2015 at 08:43 AM.
Old Sep 20, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #3375  
kikiturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 288
From: Croatia
these kits are "lazy" because they are single scroll kits... personally I wouldnt use SS turbos on road going evos, but that is just my opinion and depends on the usage...


Quick Reply: New BW EFR Turbo Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 PM.