New BW EFR Turbo Thread
Sep 28, 2011 | 08:39 AM
#887
easy solution here is... use the MD for all your testing, and after you're done... do 3 pulls heatsoaked on the MD. Drive over to the DJ on the same day... do 3 heatsoaked pulls on the DJ. Show the comparison. This will allow people to extrapolate the results into a number they understand/ know.
Regardless of why dyno you use, I think you'd still have a lot of fans for doing the testing. Make no mistake, a lot of other forums are watching Evom for EFR results.
Regardless of why dyno you use, I think you'd still have a lot of fans for doing the testing. Make no mistake, a lot of other forums are watching Evom for EFR results.
Last edited by R/TErnie; Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42 AM.
Sep 28, 2011 | 12:02 PM
#888
Sep 28, 2011 | 12:48 PM
#890
easy solution here is... use the MD for all your testing, and after you're done... do 3 pulls heatsoaked on the MD. Drive over to the DJ on the same day... do 3 heatsoaked pulls on the DJ. Show the comparison. This will allow people to extrapolate the results into a number they understand/ know.
Sep 28, 2011 | 01:18 PM
#891
Evolved Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
LOL you are clearly not going to be able to do it without having people complain, so just use whichever dyno you would normally and people can't really complain - even if its not the preferred choice its better than nothing 
Sep 28, 2011 | 05:45 PM
#892
I'm still so torn between which turbo to choose...
The 7064 or the 7670.
I'm super keen on the 7064, but i'm worried that it might just fall short of 520whp...
I wish BW made a 7367!!
The 7064 or the 7670.
I'm super keen on the 7064, but i'm worried that it might just fall short of 520whp...
I wish BW made a 7367!!
Sep 28, 2011 | 06:09 PM
#893
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I am new here but I have been watching this thread for months since all the info on the EFR's seems to come out here first. Finally made an account so i could watch it easier lol.
Come from the MR2 scene myself, it is SOOOO behind the times. Got to come to places like this to see what is really going on in the world of modern turbo cars.
Just figured i would say hi and say i am really looking forward to some results on these EFR turbos. Got my eye on a 9180 personally.
Oh, and on the which dyno should he use debate, I am going to toss my hat in as wanting dynojet numbers. Only dyno i trust but any numbers are better then no numbers.
Would save some time if i could skip right to seeing dynojet numbers though. ;-)
Come from the MR2 scene myself, it is SOOOO behind the times. Got to come to places like this to see what is really going on in the world of modern turbo cars.
Just figured i would say hi and say i am really looking forward to some results on these EFR turbos. Got my eye on a 9180 personally.
Oh, and on the which dyno should he use debate, I am going to toss my hat in as wanting dynojet numbers. Only dyno i trust but any numbers are better then no numbers.
Would save some time if i could skip right to seeing dynojet numbers though. ;-)
Sep 28, 2011 | 06:52 PM
#894
There's always a "hole" between turbo sizes that would fit someone's needs perfectly. The DBB FP Green is a 73HTA/65, if you just got to have something in that size range...
Sep 29, 2011 | 08:04 AM
#896
Sep 29, 2011 | 08:28 AM
#897
thats an interesting idea since my evo is a 2L, I could try and hot-swap turbos on the dyno (feasible since its a top mount). Ill have a little time in decemeber after PRI to get my evo finished and tuned. What dyno does everyone want to see testing on these days - mustang? dynapack? dynojet? Ill need to try and get that squared away and reserved
Sep 29, 2011 | 09:43 AM
#898
Sep 29, 2011 | 06:18 PM
#899
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: WA