any drawback to cams
Dec 24, 2003, 10:39 PM
#33
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: ..
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just a question...........................for instance, there is a GSX in this months superstreet i think that gets 22MPG on the highway and probably has around 550WHP..........nice
Dec 25, 2003, 08:10 AM
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DE
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SAEVO
just a question...........................for instance, there is a GSX in this months superstreet i think that gets 22MPG on the highway and probably has around 550WHP..........nice
just a question...........................for instance, there is a GSX in this months superstreet i think that gets 22MPG on the highway and probably has around 550WHP..........nice
I know... I would imagine you would lose a few MPG as you're essentially keeping the valves open longer and they're lifting higher. As the cams get bigger and lumpier, you'll obviously lose more.
I believe the 264s are relatively mild so I wouldn't worry about it.
Dec 25, 2003, 12:15 PM
#36
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DE
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by maki
264 are great for a daily driver, another choice is 264/272 combo
264 are great for a daily driver, another choice is 264/272 combo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thoe99
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
17
Nov 11, 2008 11:31 AM
