Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

PTE 6766 Billet CEA Ball Bearing Turbo Info Thread **

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #31  
Gary@MellonRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: miami florida
im assuming that anyone on the 6766 .83 making over 800hp + is using a 3inch turbine housing ?

Or have some people been buying the 6766 on the 2.5 turbine to make over 800hp ?

same quiestion goes for the 6765 if any 2.5 turbine housing have been producing big power?
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 06:17 AM
  #32  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
Can you link us to that said Dyno?
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 08:44 AM
  #33  
BenJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
http://store.forcedperformance.net/m..._Code=Turbo-FP

This is the link to FP's page with AWD's 901hp run
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 08:48 AM
  #34  
BenJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Link on EvoM:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...scroll-t4.html
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 04:01 PM
  #35  
Boostin Perform's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 16
From: 2116 Stonington Ave Hoffman Estates IL 60169
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
^ the 6765 out performed the 3794 allready across the board. So the 6766 shouldnt be compared to the 3794
I would have to disagree. I believe the 3794 and the 6766 to be comparable without a clear advantage going to either turbo. To know for sure back to back testing would need to be done on a dyno, so someone get on the dyno and lets see the results!

I can only speak from my experiencee, but I love my 3794! We made 833hp on a Mustang dyno with the FP3794 with more room to go; we opted to finish the tuning at the track.

I've gone 8.62 on the FP3794, and my best trap so far is 170.8 mph!

Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
Can you link us to that said Dyno?
Heres my dyno sheet for the FP3794. The other pull on the plot is the FP3586.

Devin


Last edited by Boostin Perform; Oct 23, 2011 at 04:19 PM.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 05:16 PM
  #36  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 75
From: Northwest
I have yet to max my 3794 out but I did make 831 with lower timing (4*) than I used to max my 3586 at the same boost level. I can guarantee its faster spooling than a 6765 by at least 300 rpm combo to combo. Devin, if your 830 Mustang is like Dave's thats 938 on our DJ. It (3794) is rated to 92 lbs/min which your exceeding with the obvious 170mph trap.
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 06:41 AM
  #37  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
Let's let a non Fp sponsored or distributor do the testing though. And remember Awd mike said industry standard is Dynojet. Let's get that car on a Dynojet.
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 01:24 PM
  #38  
lillev23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by pizzamanevo8
Let's let a non Fp sponsored or distributor do the testing though. And remember Awd mike said industry standard is Dynojet. Let's get that car on a Dynojet.
Like emery said, track times are all that matter. 170mph tells the story. What else do you need to know?
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #39  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Trap speeds aren't the best indication of power. These cars don't weigh the same and you also have driver, traction, weather to factor in. We're trying to compare turbos, not cars.

Last edited by Mellon Racing; Oct 24, 2011 at 03:56 PM.
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 03:51 PM
  #40  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
i thought a few shops said the 6765 spooled up quicker then the 3794 but made a few hp less.

now PTE has this new 6766 and Em at STM seems to like it.
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 01:54 AM
  #41  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
bumping this thread for any new info
Old Jul 18, 2014 | 09:03 PM
  #42  
evo 4ever's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: jamaica
Hey guys. Any further info about the 6766 comparo? I am replacing my ball bearing T67 turbo and am looking for a similar sized setup with better power potential and response. I'm sorry if this post comes a little late.
Old Jul 19, 2014 | 02:34 PM
  #43  
CT9A PR's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 323
Likes: 2
From: seattle wa
Originally Posted by evo 4ever
Hey guys. Any further info about the 6766 comparo? I am replacing my ball bearing T67 turbo and am looking for a similar sized setup with better power potential and response. I'm sorry if this post comes a little late.
We took a T67 Evo down to a simple 6266 Gen 2 and it made more power and spooled about 1000 RPM faster.

Maybe you are looking for too much power with the 6766 the old T67 made 700 whp but spool was terrible.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GetPowerHouse
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
25
Jan 24, 2013 12:06 AM
GetPowerHouse
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
76
Sep 16, 2012 10:22 AM
JDL Auto Design
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
20
Jun 18, 2012 08:52 AM
RealStreet
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
40
Dec 14, 2011 12:48 PM
EmeryatSTM
Vendor Announcements
68
Nov 6, 2011 07:13 PM



Quick Reply: PTE 6766 Billet CEA Ball Bearing Turbo Info Thread **



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:09 PM.