Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

6262 CEA or HTA86

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2012, 03:26 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ApexEVoIX03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6262 CEA or HTA86

I've been searching the hell out of this forum for info on these turbos for the past few months and have found some info but it would compare the hta86 to the old 6262. I'm looking to do a complete build this summer at AWD with a buscher 2.3 stroker and have two maps one pump gas, one E85. Anyways, I want to know some people's take on the 6262 cea and HTA86. I'm looking for full boost before 5k. They lower the better. I've thought about going Fp black and am still debating on it but I don't want to have to boost 30+ psi and go through turbos like hot cakes. I'd rather stick with a reliable t3 setup.

I'm looking for like 550-575 on pump and 600-650+ on e85. This is going to be a street/drag car. I'll probably race it a few times a year at the track. Just want a fun street car that has a nice amount of power and holds it up top.

some dyno pics and vids would be great along with some vids of the car in action!

Thanks for your help in advance

Last edited by ApexEVoIX03; Mar 21, 2012 at 02:43 PM.
Old Mar 15, 2012, 04:33 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Raif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canton CT
Posts: 189
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get a HTA86 and forget about it. Best turbo to date. The 6262 sucks in my opinion. I had both, car is .5 faster with less boost now, and spool is better.
Old Mar 15, 2012, 05:50 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,323
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
If you're only looking for 500+ on pump and 600+ on E85, a good ole regular GT3582 will do the job. Both the 6262 and HTA3586 will be laggier and are overkill for your goals.
Old Mar 15, 2012, 06:44 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
localtoys73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: deltona
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
775/650 at 36lbs with the hta3586 spool at 4500k
550/475 at 26lbs on 93 octane

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJbkAcARlFE

old video but you get the picture the old 6262 is a turd compared to the 3586 but it is cheaper and I'm not just saying that becaue I own the 3586 I have been in a few 6262 setups and the spool sucks but power is decent. The new 6266 I think it is is sweet though.
Old Mar 15, 2012, 06:58 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SDevo13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SD
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are multiple recent 6266 set ups including my own in the dyno section. I am seeing full boost well before 5k rpms even with the poor ramp rate of my place holder cams and no mivec. So are a few other 2.3 set ups. Getting a 6262 is pointless, 6266 spools faster and makes better top end.
Old Mar 15, 2012, 07:32 PM
  #6  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ApexEVoIX03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raif
Get a HTA86 and forget about it. Best turbo to date. The 6262 sucks in my opinion. I had both, car is .5 faster with less boost now, and spool is better.
True, thanks for the input. You have any videos?

Originally Posted by spdracerut
If you're only looking for 500+ on pump and 600+ on E85, a good ole regular GT3582 will do the job. Both the 6262 and HTA3586 will be laggier and are overkill for your goals.
Those are my goals. But I'd like some room up top just in case I would want a little more down the road. And the old 3582 spools faster than the hta86 and billet 6262?

Originally Posted by localtoys73
775/650 at 36lbs with the hta3586 spool at 4500k
550/475 at 26lbs on 93 octane

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJbkAcARlFE

old video but you get the picture the old 6262 is a turd compared to the 3586 but it is cheaper and I'm not just saying that becaue I own the 3586 I have been in a few 6262 setups and the spool sucks but power is decent. The new 6266 I think it is is sweet though.
First off, your car is sick man. I've seen this video before and is part of the reason I'm considering the hta86. How do you think the billet 6262 ranks up to the hta86?

Originally Posted by SDevo13
There are multiple recent 6266 set ups including my own in the dyno section. I am seeing full boost well before 5k rpms even with the poor ramp rate of my place holder cams and no mivec. So are a few other 2.3 set ups. Getting a 6262 is pointless, 6266 spools faster and makes better top end.
I saw this turbo come up a few times and just thought it would be laggier than the 6262. I'll be honest I didn't research that one but I will. When you say "well before" are we talking 4500 or sooner? And you think the 6266 is a better option than hta86?

Thanks for the input everyone keep it coming
Old Mar 15, 2012, 09:13 PM
  #7  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
tyrone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am in the same boat as you. I currently have a 6262 on a 2 ltr with a sheep trans 4.11.

The 6262 is a good turbo full boost by 5200(.82) at 5200ft above sea level and I do a 177mph on the 1000m.

I am looking to do 188mph on this distance, not really interested in 1/4 mile .

The next turbo I was consideing was the hta86 and the 6266.
I see the hta 86 trapping consistent +145mph on the quarter but have not seen to much trap data on the 6266.
Old Mar 16, 2012, 01:25 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
localtoys73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: deltona
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would say the hta86 and 6266 are very close in performance. The hta3582 will spool a little sooner then both but make less power up top. It all depends on what you are looking for I was looking for the best all around turbo for my set up which I think the hta86 is.

I am working on a new video with the final set up I will post soon.
Old Mar 17, 2012, 02:45 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ApexEVoIX03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrone
I am in the same boat as you. I currently have a 6262 on a 2 ltr with a sheep trans 4.11.

The 6262 is a good turbo full boost by 5200(.82) at 5200ft above sea level and I do a 177mph on the 1000m.

I am looking to do 188mph on this distance, not really interested in 1/4 mile .

The next turbo I was consideing was the hta86 and the 6266.
I see the hta 86 trapping consistent +145mph on the quarter but have not seen to much trap data on the 6266.
Now that the 6266 has been brought up to my attention it and that it spools better than the 6262 i'm pretty interested in that. I think both turbos looks like good contenders for my future build

Originally Posted by localtoys73
I would say the hta86 and 6266 are very close in performance. The hta3582 will spool a little sooner then both but make less power up top. It all depends on what you are looking for I was looking for the best all around turbo for my set up which I think the hta86 is.

I am working on a new video with the final set up I will post soon.
Yea I think the hta86 looks like it's going to be the one. I would want to have some overhead just in case I want to make another 50 whp without swapping turbos or taking it out of it's efficiency range. When you get finished with that video lmk I really want to see the finished product. Your car is a monster!
Old Mar 17, 2012, 04:24 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
hta3586.... you wont regret it
i made 554whp (VD dynojet) on 93 and im on a conservative tune. and that was only around 26psi
Old Mar 17, 2012, 07:22 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ApexEVoIX03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^That's what I like to hear! good **** man thanks for the input
Old Mar 17, 2012, 07:29 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ApexEVoIX03
^That's what I like to hear! good **** man thanks for the input
no problem man. i wish i could push more power out of it but im still on stock motor, so like i said its a conservative tune purposely keeping torque low.
Old Mar 17, 2012, 07:48 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ApexEVoIX03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EvoJoeIX
no problem man. i wish i could push more power out of it but im still on stock motor, so like i said its a conservative tune purposely keeping torque low.
damn its going to be too serious when the motor is built! good luck on finishing it.


Been looking for 6266 setups on other cars for more comparison, if anyone has anything similar to what I'm going for post it.
Old Mar 18, 2012, 09:48 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
s.e.a.n.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,293
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I love my 6262 full boost right at 5k with a built 2.0 stock head.

Old Mar 18, 2012, 10:42 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
b16a95eg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 6266 only spools quicker than the non CEA 6262, the CEA 6262 is going to spool quicker than the 6266,


Quick Reply: 6262 CEA or HTA86



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:41 PM.