New CEA Precision 6466!! Dyno graphs vs 6266 and 6766 INSIDE!!!
Apr 10, 2012, 07:23 PM
#46
i never said anything about holding 30psi. but it is done on pump gas. but to say the 6766 is better for 30psi type setups is wrong. your 62 will be a hell of a better match at 30psi then the 67 will. 6766 i would say if for guys looking for 900hp OVER 40psi. thats where the 67 belongs.
I never had any luck with that much boost on pump myself..... at least couldn't get very aggressive with timing.
Apr 10, 2012, 07:44 PM
#47
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i never said anything about holding 30psi. but it is done on pump gas. but to say the 6766 is better for 30psi type setups is wrong. your 62 will be a hell of a better match at 30psi then the 67 will. 6766 i would say if for guys looking for 900hp OVER 40psi. thats where the 67 belongs.
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
Apr 10, 2012, 08:09 PM
#48
You might have read too fast or something... but when did I say the 6766 is better than a 6266 at 30 psi??
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
Apr 10, 2012, 08:38 PM
#49
You might have read too fast or something... but when did I say the 6766 is better than a 6266 at 30 psi??
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
Apr 10, 2012, 08:44 PM
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why in the world would you use such a big turbo to run low boost? a 6266 will have a much better curve then a 6766 at 30psi. thats my point. there is no point to run a big turbo at low boost. yes 30psi being low boost. i did not read to fast. i just feel a 6766 only seeing 30psi is a dumb choice when there is clearly better options. dont expect a 6266 to hold up to anything the 6766 can do at 40psi though. which brings me back to saying where the 6766 will shine.
I don't care about your point about the 6266 having a better curve than a 6766 at 30psi because that was never the subject we are debating. You just magically came up with that to make it look like you know what you are talking about.
Now here is my post again just in case you get ahead of yourself again.
The 6466 is the turbo to get, it will outspool the 6766. The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi.
Sound Performance tested the EFR too...it wasn't that great. Spool was slightly better than the 6266 but it lacked the power the 6266 could deliver. And for the price difference, the 6266 is a MUCH better deal than the EFR.
EFR on stock 2JZGTE motor on page 5 http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...ll-in-!!/page4
Sound Performance tested the EFR too...it wasn't that great. Spool was slightly better than the 6266 but it lacked the power the 6266 could deliver. And for the price difference, the 6266 is a MUCH better deal than the EFR.
EFR on stock 2JZGTE motor on page 5 http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...ll-in-!!/page4
Apr 10, 2012, 09:17 PM
#51
You are getting way ahead of yourself. I don't know who you are arguing against but it sounds like you are putting words in my mouth. Read my post again, CAREFULLY. And tell me when did I ever say to run a 6766 on 30psi.
I don't care about your point about the 6266 having a better curve than a 6766 at 30psi because that was never the subject we are debating. You just magically came up with that to make it look like you know what you are talking about.
Now here is my post again just in case you get ahead of yourself again.
And I didn't compare the 6766 to the 6266 for your information. I was comparing it to the EFR turbo.
I don't care about your point about the 6266 having a better curve than a 6766 at 30psi because that was never the subject we are debating. You just magically came up with that to make it look like you know what you are talking about.
Now here is my post again just in case you get ahead of yourself again.
And I didn't compare the 6766 to the 6266 for your information. I was comparing it to the EFR turbo.
am i ahead of my self? im sorry i can not follow your super smart analogy.
Apr 10, 2012, 09:27 PM
#52
here is my theory.
if your looking for an awesome street car with a great curve under 800hp then the 6262, 6266, HTA86 is the turbo to have. 28 to 35psi these turbos seem to shine the most. yes you can run 40 but your basically pushing it to hard.
if your looking for a power house type setup and could care less about low/mid power and want to run 40+psi the 6766 will do the job much nicer. its where it belongs.
the new 6466 is geared for the guy who wants that 6266 type spoolup but gain more topend. we do not know to much about this turbo yet so we need to wait to see results. but if your gonna max out both 6466 and 6766 the 6766 will trump the 6466 all day. BUT you lose that low/mid grunt.
when you say the 6766 will be a better choice over 30 psi is wrong. again the 6266, HTA86 ''and soon the 6466'' are all able to control 30+ meaning most commonly used boost levels in the 30's range just as good as the 6766 but with a hell of a better curve. i see no point to use the 6766 UNDER 40psi and most people at that stage are ringing the turbo out. sigh which again is where the 6766 belongs.
if your looking for an awesome street car with a great curve under 800hp then the 6262, 6266, HTA86 is the turbo to have. 28 to 35psi these turbos seem to shine the most. yes you can run 40 but your basically pushing it to hard.
if your looking for a power house type setup and could care less about low/mid power and want to run 40+psi the 6766 will do the job much nicer. its where it belongs.
the new 6466 is geared for the guy who wants that 6266 type spoolup but gain more topend. we do not know to much about this turbo yet so we need to wait to see results. but if your gonna max out both 6466 and 6766 the 6766 will trump the 6466 all day. BUT you lose that low/mid grunt.
when you say the 6766 will be a better choice over 30 psi is wrong. again the 6266, HTA86 ''and soon the 6466'' are all able to control 30+ meaning most commonly used boost levels in the 30's range just as good as the 6766 but with a hell of a better curve. i see no point to use the 6766 UNDER 40psi and most people at that stage are ringing the turbo out. sigh which again is where the 6766 belongs.
Apr 12, 2012, 01:11 PM
#53
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Li, NY
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 6466 is the turbo to get, it will outspool the 6766. The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi.
Sound Performance tested the EFR too...it wasn't that great. Spool was slightly better than the 6266 but it lacked the power the 6266 could deliver. And for the price difference, the 6266 is a MUCH better deal than the EFR.
EFR on stock 2JZGTE motor on page 5 http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...ll-in-!!/page4
Sound Performance tested the EFR too...it wasn't that great. Spool was slightly better than the 6266 but it lacked the power the 6266 could deliver. And for the price difference, the 6266 is a MUCH better deal than the EFR.
EFR on stock 2JZGTE motor on page 5 http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...ll-in-!!/page4
You might have read too fast or something... but when did I say the 6766 is better than a 6266 at 30 psi??
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
I was comparing the 6466 and 6766 at 30+ psi. Also note, that I said "The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi"
Going all out means you got somewhat of a built motor pushing it to its limits. On good built motor the 6766 will outperform the 6466 as well as the 6266! And you don't need to be pushing over 40 psi for the 6766 to shine at that point.
You are getting way ahead of yourself. I don't know who you are arguing against but it sounds like you are putting words in my mouth. Read my post again, CAREFULLY. And tell me when did I ever say to run a 6766 on 30psi.
I don't care about your point about the 6266 having a better curve than a 6766 at 30psi because that was never the subject we are debating. You just magically came up with that to make it look like you know what you are talking about.
Now here is my post again just in case you get ahead of yourself again.
And I didn't compare the 6766 to the 6266 for your information. I was comparing it to the EFR turbo.
I don't care about your point about the 6266 having a better curve than a 6766 at 30psi because that was never the subject we are debating. You just magically came up with that to make it look like you know what you are talking about.
Now here is my post again just in case you get ahead of yourself again.
And I didn't compare the 6766 to the 6266 for your information. I was comparing it to the EFR turbo.
You said word for word: The 6766 will only be a better choice of you are going all out at 30+psi.
Apr 13, 2012, 08:52 PM
#57
Jul 2, 2012, 01:43 PM
#59
Please call 631 465 0988 or e-mail us at Sales@GetPowerhouse.com to order!!
Jul 5, 2012, 10:55 AM
#60
Please call 631 465 0988 or e-mail us at Sales@GetPowerhouse.com to order!!