Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

quaition on new 6466 vs 6766 .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2012, 09:48 AM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,398
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by evodan2004
is that good? sorry im not being sarcastic. i just dont know.
For a non MIVEC car yes I am impressed. Its not twin scroll as far as I know, so to put that into perspective my car spools 300rpm sooner is all. 111mph trap should be something like high 130s if it wasnt spinning, spinning though it could be in the 140s right now.

Aaron
Old May 3, 2012, 01:46 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by maperformance
Umm, no its not.... Its cheaper than the 67....
Right on Precisions website its $710 more

$1909.99 vs $1199.99

Last edited by Svendiesel; May 3, 2012 at 01:49 PM.
Old May 3, 2012, 03:46 PM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,398
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Sorry I was incorrect on both the turbo and engine. It is a 2.3 with a 6266. Still impressive for both response and 1/8 mile.
Old May 3, 2012, 04:04 PM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Aaron what youre saying is that I need a 6466 to show what that thing can really do. High 5's at 125 in the 1/8th?
Old May 3, 2012, 04:07 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,398
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
I am saying that the 6266 seems to be performing so if you really wanted a 6466 I'd still be your friend.



Aaron
Old May 3, 2012, 05:46 PM
  #36  
Newbie
 
talonspyder97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Severna Park, MD
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6466 is only available as a ball bearing turbo. Need to compare apples to apples. the price on PTE website for the 67 is a journal bearing.
Old May 3, 2012, 07:00 PM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Svendiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Teh internets.
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I am saying that the 6266 seems to be performing so if you really wanted a 6466 I'd still be your friend.



Aaron
Oh goodyyyy because Im planning on needing a fresh e-tune from you in the not too distant future for one that may end up under my hood

I need to email you too soon actually, I have a new WGA on my EF4 and I just wanna send you a log to be sure everythings still cool with duty cycles and what not, I just need to pop a spring in it and do a boost leak test.
Old May 3, 2012, 07:51 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Anarchy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by talonspyder97
6466 is only available as a ball bearing turbo. Need to compare apples to apples. the price on PTE website for the 67 is a journal bearing.
its like +600 for bb
Old May 3, 2012, 08:05 PM
  #39  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
maperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Posts: 12,805
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
6266 - 1599.99
6466 - 1909.99
6766 - 2109.99
Old May 4, 2012, 08:09 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: KSA
Posts: 570
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm just waiting for results of the new 6466 , but the 6766 is still in the top as what I can see .
Old May 4, 2012, 08:46 AM
  #41  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
maperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Posts: 12,805
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Might be "top" because of maybe a few extra HP, but I don't see that as "top". I look at the overall performance of the turbo. Faster spool and 950+whp capable. That is "top" for me, even though I'm not ever going to make that power, I might still run it on my setup haha.
Old May 4, 2012, 09:12 AM
  #42  
Newbie
 
talonspyder97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Severna Park, MD
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buschur should have some results this week I believe According to FB anyway.
Old May 4, 2012, 09:16 AM
  #43  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
maperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Posts: 12,805
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Sweetness.
Old May 4, 2012, 09:30 AM
  #44  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: KSA
Posts: 570
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by maperformance
Might be "top" because of maybe a few extra HP, but I don't see that as "top". I look at the overall performance of the turbo. Faster spool and 950+whp capable. That is "top" for me, even though I'm not ever going to make that power, I might still run it on my setup haha.
I saw the Vid of the car ur talking about did 954whp on 50psi T4 6466/.1.32 A/R and its still on stock head . I dont know how they did this power ..
I will send u my sheet ones my car is done at 50psi then we will see
Old May 4, 2012, 11:29 AM
  #45  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
maperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Posts: 12,805
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Hope you can get a real tuner to tune it this time!


Quick Reply: quaition on new 6466 vs 6766 .



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:41 PM.