Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Horsepower on pump.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 10:39 AM
  #16  
Evojj25's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, La
What about tq on pump and e85 yall?
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 02:29 PM
  #17  
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 947
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, Ca
I think 500whp is very reasonable for 91 Oct and 550whp for good 93 oct
Old Feb 5, 2014 | 06:11 PM
  #18  
Frew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
I too am on the hunt for big pump gas power/powerband. I'm thinking 2.3, ported head, 6466, 93 octane, and 30 psi. I think that should be capable of 650 whp with a nice beefy powerband.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 74
From: Northwest
High flowing cylinder head, big cams, good intake manifold, testpipe dump (basically as low restriction exhaust as possible, and then yeah 650 can happen



Knowing what I know now, a 3 port could have made more since I would have been able to keep the boost level out the top rather than have it drop 2psi.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 12:03 PM
  #20  
Evojj25's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, La
Those are some good numbers.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 12:41 PM
  #21  
doober's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
High flowing cylinder head, big cams, good intake manifold, testpipe dump (basically as low restriction exhaust as possible, and then yeah 650 can happen

Knowing what I know now, a 3 port could have made more since I would have been able to keep the boost level out the top rather than have it drop 2psi.
Always impressed.. Was that a 6266 or a 6466? Stock displacement?
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #22  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 74
From: Northwest
ETS turbo kit with FP3586 on a LR2.4, Magnus V5, R2s, ETS 4" FMIC, ETS 3.5" exhaust with testpipe dump, Chevron 92. I think the 6466 can do something similar but the 6266 would be less at the same boost level.

Last edited by JohnBradley; Feb 6, 2014 at 03:04 PM.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 02:39 PM
  #23  
Benja's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia.
Yeah wow.
~92 octane here, 529/385 on 23.5psi, 6262
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #24  
Frew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
What would the spool difference of a 6466 vs a 6266 on a 2.4 John? Both bb of course.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 03:02 PM
  #25  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
The new Gen 2 PT6266 are available now as well Faster spool and more horsepower!
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 03:04 PM
  #26  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 74
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by Frew
What would the spool difference of a 6466 vs a 6266 on a 2.4 John? Both bb of course.
The ones I dyno'd there was ZERO difference other than the 6466 makes more power.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 04:03 PM
  #27  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
ETS turbo kit with FP3586 on a LR2.4, Magnus V5, R2s, ETS 4" FMIC, ETS 3.5" exhaust with testpipe dump, Chevron 92. I think the 6466 can do something similar but the 6266 would be less at the same boost level.
So even on a 3.5" exhaust the test pipe dump helped? I wouldn't have expected that.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 04:32 PM
  #28  
doober's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
ETS turbo kit with FP3586 on a LR2.4, Magnus V5, R2s, ETS 4" FMIC, ETS 3.5" exhaust with testpipe dump, Chevron 92. I think the 6466 can do something similar but the 6266 would be less at the same boost level.
That's the graph I wanted to see for awhile! Thanks!
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 02:39 PM
  #29  
Frew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
The ones I dyno'd there was ZERO difference other than the 6466 makes more power.
That is what I like to hear sir :-)
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 02:46 PM
  #30  
Frew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
The new Gen 2 PT6266 are available now as well Faster spool and more horsepower!
I see it's rated at 800 hp now, I wonder how spool compares to a current Gen 6466...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EvODavO
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
6
Nov 17, 2016 07:38 PM
Evodetailer123
For Sale - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
0
Oct 6, 2016 01:09 PM
wallie123
For Sale - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
3
Aug 10, 2016 11:53 AM
wallie123
For Sale - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Aug 4, 2016 06:53 PM
BoostNY
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Apr 4, 2016 06:00 PM



Quick Reply: Horsepower on pump.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 AM.