Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Jun 264 or 272 for my needs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2015, 09:20 AM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
awhit17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 449
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Jun 264 or 272 for my needs?

Alright so I'm beginning to look at cams for my Evo IX and I have settled on buying a set of Juns, that part is certain. But my question is which cam would be better for my car/desires.

Mods:
- Stock 2.0L
- Stock turbo now, possible upgraded stock frame in future, 400whp MAX
- Exhaust/Intake/DP/255/Injectors/3 port/etc

What I want from the cams is extremely little to no increase (or even a reduction) in boost threshold, and essentially equal or better transient response/time-to-torque as stock cams along with power gains of course. I know the Mivec allows you to run a large cam and loose very little boost threshold (verified by dyno graphs and everyone here) but not many people talk about transient response- and it is to my understanding that a large set of cams will tend to dull this. I know the 272s should pick up more top end than the 264s, but if this comes with at significant cost to transient response I would rather accept the assumed more moderate horsepower gains of the 264s.

Does anyone have any input? Can the Mivec be used to pull good transient response out of some big 272s? Other thoughts? Let me know! Remember - my goals are not big power numbers on the dyno, but rather driving feel and a broad powerband.
Old Feb 12, 2015, 10:46 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SWOLN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the Florida Swamps
Posts: 1,791
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
I had the JUN 272's in my car with an old FP Green, and made over 400 hp on 93 oct. 380 hp on a low reading Mustang dyno. Transient was good, definitely a lot of fun, but you'll be hard pressed to do better than stock cams in that regard although a good MIVEC map goes a long way. I have the cams still if you are looking for some used ones.
Old Feb 12, 2015, 10:54 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
awhit17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 449
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by SWOLN
I had the JUN 272's in my car with an old FP Green, and made over 400 hp on 93 oct. 380 hp on a low reading Mustang dyno. Transient was good, definitely a lot of fun, but you'll be hard pressed to do better than stock cams in that regard although a good MIVEC map goes a long way. I have the cams still if you are looking for some used ones.
Yeah I'm not sure how greedy I'm being with what I want from a set of cams - I know there are tradeoffs everywhere. I'm hoping though someone can chime in with some 264 experience or even better a relative comparison of the 264s vs 272s. Because if there's going to be a significant difference in boost recovery between the two I'll probably stick with the 264s.
Old Feb 15, 2015, 01:50 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
awhit17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 449
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Anyone have more insight??
Old Feb 15, 2015, 03:55 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
 
Bhsj13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts
get some 272's and call it a day. your butt dyno will not notice a difference in the boost and recovery. i would go the 272's.
Old Feb 19, 2015, 10:21 PM
  #6  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
E46HamannM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I went with HKS 264's personally for the reasons your contemplating ; my car is setup for autocross, so transient response is extremely important. The 272's are not necessary if you really only want 400hp. Most people just follow the mold, and buy the 272's because they don't understand everything involved, and it's easy for any shop to just throw those in to hit a target HP number.
Old Feb 20, 2015, 06:35 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
 
Bhsj13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 26 Posts
or... ask your tuner. that's what i did.
Old Feb 20, 2015, 02:18 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
evo8426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 4,248
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
If I were to do it all over from the beginning....I would keep OEM cams with OEM turbo.
Old Feb 20, 2015, 03:57 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
I had the same dilemma a few months back, my plan is to maximize power gains on a stock engine & turbo (non-mivec) & I'd hate to lose any transit response. After a bit of research about cams, I chose the GSC S1s, at 268 degrees is a kind of compromise between 264 & 272.
Old Feb 20, 2015, 06:10 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by foxbat
.... my plan is to maximize power gains on a stock engine & turbo (non-mivec) & I'd hate to lose any transit response....I chose the GSC S1s, at 268 degrees as a kind of compromise between 264 & 272.
So far, in your experience, how do the GSC S1's compare to the stock cams as far as turbo spool-up and transient response are concerned(seat of the pants)?
Old Feb 20, 2015, 06:20 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
 
sssr20det510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: vancouver washington
Posts: 192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This guy made 400 whp on stock cams.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-dyno-tuning-results/693187-evo-9-se-stock-turbo-stock-cams-93oct.html
Old Feb 20, 2015, 09:03 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
awhit17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 449
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
I think it has been pretty well documented on this forum that if you have a MIVEC motor, you will not loose any boost threshold with something equivalent to a GSC S2 or so or smaller. Transient response, however, is different and isn't shown on the dyno so a lot fewer people have concrete info.

Also, duration listed by manufacturers doesn't exactly tell you how aggressive a cam is. For example the Jun 264 have a relatively high effective duration and can therefore be considered "more aggressive" than an HKS 272, among other cams.

I was really hoping to magically find someone who has experience with Jun 264s or 272s and compare them with the stock cams, and to see if they change the characteristic of the car in off/on throttle situations. Idk if that person exists though lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TalonRcR
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
34
Aug 8, 2005 01:03 PM
500whp.com
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
12
Jul 1, 2005 11:29 AM
SlowCar
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Mar 27, 2005 06:12 PM
Chris@nolimitmotors
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
3
Feb 3, 2005 08:36 AM



Quick Reply: Jun 264 or 272 for my needs?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 PM.