have the 276 on the 2.3 fp black car

wondering how these would do on my 2.3 6266 with ported head well the 284 or is this overkill

 

when you are considering big power on a 2.3, consider your RPM limit, 6266 will make power on a 2.3 earlier on throughout the powerband compared to a 2.0, but you still cant rev it over 8.5k.

same with cams, high lift cams shift the powerband to the right, giving you lots of power up top, which again for a stroker, is not ideal. Not saying it wont work, just saying I wouldn't do it.

 

duration changes RPM range more than lift. If you look at the GSC R2, its a 274 "high lift" specific to lower revving stroker engines.
That said, dont go with the 284 high lift unless you are revving past 8500 rpm.

 

I wanted r2 but was told they work better with stock framw turbo + stroker. That I should just go with 280 but I love my kelford 276 but my turbo isnt large.

 

On a 2.3, use the R2 or the Kelford 276HL. You won't be revving high enough to use the duration the of the Kelford 284, or the comparable GSC S3. But the additional lift of the 276HL or R2 will help better fill the cylinder.

 

my ve on the 276 car is so ****ing high compared to other cars

120 at like 7500 vs 105 on a similar built car with s2

 

You can alter different settings to have a high or a low VE value on stock ecu SD. I wouldn't base anything off of what value you use in that table.