How much fuel to take out with 255HP?
#4
Originally posted by matt55
Thats kinda what i was thinking,,,,, but i hear of reflashes that ask if you have a upgraded fuel pump or not . But thanks man.
Thats kinda what i was thinking,,,,, but i hear of reflashes that ask if you have a upgraded fuel pump or not . But thanks man.
Eric
#5
It will run fat after a Walbro 255 HP upgrade. I don't know how much richer it will run or how much extra to take out. But I can tell you it does run richer at any boost level over 3 psi. If I were guessing I would say you could take out about 4 to 5% more fuel on the top end to stay somewhat close to where you were before the fuel pump upgrade. You will notice the car is slower after the pump upgrade, that is do to the over rich condition. I don't have a wideband, but I was datalogging O2 voltage after the pump and noticed the higher voltages.
Brian
Brian
#7
Originally posted by TURBODAWG
It will run fat after a Walbro 255 HP upgrade. I don't know how much richer it will run or how much extra to take out. But I can tell you it does run richer at any boost level over 3 psi. If I were guessing I would say you could take out about 4 to 5% more fuel on the top end to stay somewhat close to where you were before the fuel pump upgrade. You will notice the car is slower after the pump upgrade, that is do to the over rich condition. I don't have a wideband, but I was datalogging O2 voltage after the pump and noticed the higher voltages.
Brian
It will run fat after a Walbro 255 HP upgrade. I don't know how much richer it will run or how much extra to take out. But I can tell you it does run richer at any boost level over 3 psi. If I were guessing I would say you could take out about 4 to 5% more fuel on the top end to stay somewhat close to where you were before the fuel pump upgrade. You will notice the car is slower after the pump upgrade, that is do to the over rich condition. I don't have a wideband, but I was datalogging O2 voltage after the pump and noticed the higher voltages.
Brian
Not to sound mean or like a jerk but your are not going to have any sort of a valid reading from any factory o2. So you voltage logging does not mean anything. Plus I have yet to find a true real time data logger they are all off a bit.
Also 4%-5% is a bit of fuel even on a S-AFC. That's enough to have motor damage. Tops on my car with a full exhaust I was only able to pull 8% at 5500 rpm of fuel. That gave me a nice 11.7 to 1 AF on a wideband.
The pump should run a bit richer but not enough to have a completey retune the whole AF.
My Best
Eric
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by matt55
Maybe i was too lean , b/c it run a lil better after the pump upgrade (maybe its in my head) .
Maybe i was too lean , b/c it run a lil better after the pump upgrade (maybe its in my head) .
Ing advance is very important to making constent repeatable power.
Eric
#10
O2 voltages do mean something!!
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Brain,
Not to sound mean or like a jerk but your are not going to have any sort of a valid reading from any factory o2. So you voltage logging does not mean anything. Plus I have yet to find a true real time data logger they are all off a bit.
Also 4%-5% is a bit of fuel even on a S-AFC. That's enough to have motor damage. Tops on my car with a full exhaust I was only able to pull 8% at 5500 rpm of fuel. That gave me a nice 11.7 to 1 AF on a wideband.
The pump should run a bit richer but not enough to have a completey retune the whole AF.
My Best
Eric
Brain,
Not to sound mean or like a jerk but your are not going to have any sort of a valid reading from any factory o2. So you voltage logging does not mean anything. Plus I have yet to find a true real time data logger they are all off a bit.
Also 4%-5% is a bit of fuel even on a S-AFC. That's enough to have motor damage. Tops on my car with a full exhaust I was only able to pull 8% at 5500 rpm of fuel. That gave me a nice 11.7 to 1 AF on a wideband.
The pump should run a bit richer but not enough to have a completey retune the whole AF.
My Best
Eric
BTW, at the track, running race gas, I was pulling out 18% to 20% up top. This was getting me .88 to .90 volts. I tune this way currently, and my car has run pretty well with this method. 12.2 @ 118.4 mph. Stock turbo, intercooler and injectors.
It is not as accurate as a wideband, but it does give relevant and reliable information. My pocketlogger recieves 19 samples per second and I can see the changes in MAF voltages when I make changes on the AFR. I think the datalogger is working fine.
Buschur gives information for tuning the SAFC referencing O2 voltages. He seems to think it works well too. I have a Techedge in my Supra and I love it, but I don't in the Evo yet.
Another, thing to keep in mind when tuning with O2 voltages, the O2 voltage will change as the sensor heats up. It will change as much as .02 volts without having a change in air fuel. So its accurancy and consistency is at .02 volts at the best. That is not that accurate, but if that is kept in mind, you can use it very effectively when tuning.
And, I didn't think your post was being a jerk. Maybe a little "close minded", but thats okay in my book. Everyone has their opinions and now you know mine.
Brian
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
razorlab
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Dec 6, 2016 08:45 PM
FS[South]: Aftermarket 8/9 fuel rail
mikgsxx
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Oct 14, 2015 01:35 PM
twinturbogreg
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Sep 28, 2010 03:00 PM