2.3 stroker
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
2.3 stroker
I've seen 150mm rods with 100mm stroke. But would a 94mm stroker and 156mm rods be a better option to reduce crank harmonics and have a revvier 2.3 displacement?
#3
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
94mm crank makes a 2.2
Can do custom 153mm rods with a shelf piston, or the more affordable route is a custom piston and 150mm rods. I do a lot of 94/150 motors, they rev to 9500 without issue.
Or you can do a 4g64 block with 156mm rods.
Can do custom 153mm rods with a shelf piston, or the more affordable route is a custom piston and 150mm rods. I do a lot of 94/150 motors, they rev to 9500 without issue.
Or you can do a 4g64 block with 156mm rods.
The following users liked this post:
GTA.RS (Yesterday)
#4
What everyone else said is correct.
156mm rods would be nice but you need a 4g64 block. Only disadvantage of the 4g64 is that you have a bigger bore thus weakening the cylinder walls. You could always sleeve a 4g64 and run standard size pistons but, it would cost more.
As for 153mm rods, you can get Nitto V2 i-beams from australia. USD is super strong at the moment so you can get them for like 900USD after conversion. I talked to Nitto and they said they’re rated for 350-400hp per rod at the crank but they’re pretty heavy and weigh 676grams. They have the V1 rods that only weigh 607grams but are rated for 250hp.
Nitto also sells pistons for their 153mm rods, but they’re made by CP.
156mm rods would be nice but you need a 4g64 block. Only disadvantage of the 4g64 is that you have a bigger bore thus weakening the cylinder walls. You could always sleeve a 4g64 and run standard size pistons but, it would cost more.
As for 153mm rods, you can get Nitto V2 i-beams from australia. USD is super strong at the moment so you can get them for like 900USD after conversion. I talked to Nitto and they said they’re rated for 350-400hp per rod at the crank but they’re pretty heavy and weigh 676grams. They have the V1 rods that only weigh 607grams but are rated for 250hp.
Nitto also sells pistons for their 153mm rods, but they’re made by CP.
#5
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
You do not sleeve a 4g64 for standard pistons.
The 4g64 block works well to ~1000whp with proper head sealing methods.
The 4g64 block works well to ~1000whp with proper head sealing methods.
#6
Evolved Member
What everyone else said is correct.
156mm rods would be nice but you need a 4g64 block. Only disadvantage of the 4g64 is that you have a bigger bore thus weakening the cylinder walls. You could always sleeve a 4g64 and run standard size pistons but, it would cost more.
As for 153mm rods, you can get Nitto V2 i-beams from australia. USD is super strong at the moment so you can get them for like 900USD after conversion. I talked to Nitto and they said they’re rated for 350-400hp per rod at the crank but they’re pretty heavy and weigh 676grams. They have the V1 rods that only weigh 607grams but are rated for 250hp.
Nitto also sells pistons for their 153mm rods, but they’re made by CP.
156mm rods would be nice but you need a 4g64 block. Only disadvantage of the 4g64 is that you have a bigger bore thus weakening the cylinder walls. You could always sleeve a 4g64 and run standard size pistons but, it would cost more.
As for 153mm rods, you can get Nitto V2 i-beams from australia. USD is super strong at the moment so you can get them for like 900USD after conversion. I talked to Nitto and they said they’re rated for 350-400hp per rod at the crank but they’re pretty heavy and weigh 676grams. They have the V1 rods that only weigh 607grams but are rated for 250hp.
Nitto also sells pistons for their 153mm rods, but they’re made by CP.
#7
I assume they were sleeved for longevity and machinability in the future.
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
I was thinking more along the lines of using a 2.3 piston. But instead of 100mm stroke go 94mm and put the 6mm the crank would have had into the rod length to make up for the 100mm to have a better rod ratio.
Or is that not a possibility. Either way ill be going a 2.3. Moreso thinking out loud with those more knowledgeable
Or is that not a possibility. Either way ill be going a 2.3. Moreso thinking out loud with those more knowledgeable
#10
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Phillthy4g
I was thinking more along the lines of using a 2.3 piston. But instead of 100mm stroke go 94mm and put the 6mm the crank would have had into the rod length to make up for the 100mm to have a better rod ratio.
Or is that not a possibility. Either way ill be going a 2.3. Moreso thinking out loud with those more knowledgeable
Or is that not a possibility. Either way ill be going a 2.3. Moreso thinking out loud with those more knowledgeable
#11
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2.3stroker
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Dec 3, 2014 08:45 AM
Joeekrub
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Feb 6, 2013 12:20 PM
Frenchy4g63
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
29
Jan 10, 2007 10:39 AM