What is the potential of the EVO stock turbo?
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: bay area
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
We made 404whp and 401 ft lbs of torque .. 100 octane unleaded, AEM EMS setup and alot of boost ..
Pump gas 23 psi ...the car made back to back 385 whp ... The aem frees up about 30 extra whp from any other piggy back / flash / afc out there. .. The guy went consistant 11.7 on 94 octane, stock intercooler as well...
Pump gas 23 psi ...the car made back to back 385 whp ... The aem frees up about 30 extra whp from any other piggy back / flash / afc out there. .. The guy went consistant 11.7 on 94 octane, stock intercooler as well...
Last edited by ez76; Jun 1, 2004 at 04:59 PM.
#17
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ez76
at stock turbo boost levels, what's an aem doing that can't be emulated with a reflash or piggyback? [i am ignorant]
Converting the car to speed density ..and losing the mass air sensor is huge gains ..
Mark
Turbotrix
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.buschurracing.com/EVO_Stage4.html This will help with how much power you can get from the stock turbo.
#19
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U.S.M.C.
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey turbo how would u recomend doing this.....i know you can go the aem ems route but i also heard ultimate came out with a blow through sensor but im not too sure about that....wha do u think
#20
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
We made 404whp and 401 ft lbs of torque .. 100 octane unleaded, AEM EMS setup and alot of boost ..
Pump gas 23 psi ...the car made back to back 385 whp ... The aem frees up about 30 extra whp from any other piggy back / flash / afc out there. .. The guy went consistant 11.7 on 94 octane, stock intercooler as well...
mark
turbotrix racing
Pump gas 23 psi ...the car made back to back 385 whp ... The aem frees up about 30 extra whp from any other piggy back / flash / afc out there. .. The guy went consistant 11.7 on 94 octane, stock intercooler as well...
mark
turbotrix racing
thanks Chris.
#21
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
We didn't wing the hell out of the stock turbo and try to get it to produce 28 psi of boost on a spike or anything. We did manage 390 whp and 390 ft lbs of torque with the AEM EMS in the car and the stock turbo, head, shortblock.
We have gone 11.65 at 117.88 mph on the stock turbo though, so 11's on the stock turbo is DEFINETELY do-able.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
We have gone 11.65 at 117.88 mph on the stock turbo though, so 11's on the stock turbo is DEFINETELY do-able.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
#22
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Converting the car to speed density ..and losing the mass air sensor is huge gains ..
Mark
Turbotrix
Mark
Turbotrix
But I still love the Utec.
Anyway awesome numbers on the stock turbo
One hell of a tune, congrats.
#24
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ron achieved ... 11.7 on with the ems on the stock turbo and pump gas. Stock intercooler. He had cams, turbo back exhaust, pipe kit and boost controler with air filter .. Ohh and injectors..660cc ..which btw were maxed out at 400 hp ..
Mark
Turbotrix
Mark
Turbotrix
#25
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
I have to agree.. its definitely possible.. But like everyone has said in the past few messages the key to making those numbers is reducing as many of the restrictions in the intake and exhaust path as possible.. At what point does it become impractical due to the costs of upgrading components over just bolting up a new turbo kit will be your own judgement though. I realize that people love the speed density conversion, but the blowthrough MAF upgrade is also an option, though not cheap. As far as I can tell so far, if you want to get 400+ whp, you need to address inherant restrictions in the system.. upgraded cams, upgraded exhaust, upgraded intercooler and piping, reducing restrictions introduced by the MAF sensor, throttle body, intake manifold and head.. The real problem is that the cost of an upgraded head, throttle body, and MAF upgrade, end up costing nearly as much as a turbo kit and AEM setup.
HOWEVER, the one advantage of stock (or stock design) turbos, and retaining it is drivability, and fun factor on the street..
HOWEVER, the one advantage of stock (or stock design) turbos, and retaining it is drivability, and fun factor on the street..
#26
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kohler, WI
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what's the secret to getting the stock turbo to spool by 2800RPM?
Originally Posted by 4G63>OOOO
With some money spent, you can make the stock turbo spool (24psi) by 2800rpm. I think it will max out at about 380-390whp and that's almost killing the damn thing.
Trust me, with an optimized stock turbo setup, you'll have your hands full.
Trust me, with an optimized stock turbo setup, you'll have your hands full.
#27
Originally Posted by MPZ06
350 is about the upper limits of the stocker...............
I want to see the time slips of 11 second runs on stock turbo, no Nos.................
I want to see the time slips of 11 second runs on stock turbo, no Nos.................
I ran an 11.98 and an 11.95@116mph a few weeks back with an Evo III 16G on my 1997 Eclipse GSX (3150lbs without me in it) at 24psi. I ran 118mph last year with the same turbo at 25 to 26psi, but the spike I was getting was over 30psi, so I haven't tried it again. I think I have sorted out the spike, now, though.
Last edited by ShapeGSX; Jun 3, 2004 at 07:04 AM.
#28
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I have to agree.. its definitely possible.. But like everyone has said in the past few messages the key to making those numbers is reducing as many of the restrictions in the intake and exhaust path as possible.. At what point does it become impractical due to the costs of upgrading components over just bolting up a new turbo kit will be your own judgement though.
Personally, I don't think that a GM hotwire MAF gives much (if any) restriction at all. So it is a toss-up between it and speed density.
But then again, I'm still running a bone stock 2G DSM MAF.
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tri-State
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShapeGSX
I don't see why an 11 second run on a 9.8cm^2 twin-scroll 16G is such a big deal. People have been doing it for years with 7cm^2 single-scroll 16Gs on DSMs.
I ran an 11.98 and an 11.95@116mph a few weeks back with an Evo III 16G on my 1997 Eclipse GSX (3150lbs without me in it) at 24psi. I ran 118mph last year with the same turbo at 25 to 26psi, but the spike I was getting was over 30psi, so I haven't tried it again. I think I have sorted out the spike, now, though.
I ran an 11.98 and an 11.95@116mph a few weeks back with an Evo III 16G on my 1997 Eclipse GSX (3150lbs without me in it) at 24psi. I ran 118mph last year with the same turbo at 25 to 26psi, but the spike I was getting was over 30psi, so I haven't tried it again. I think I have sorted out the spike, now, though.
Evo is like 3350lb with driver so you have a 200lb advantage. Some people are runing 11.8@116 or better with the stock turbo. .
#30
Originally Posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Evo is like 3350lb with driver so you have a 200lb advantage. Some people are runing 11.8@116 or better with the stock turbo. .