Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What is the potential of the EVO stock turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2004, 04:56 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ez76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: bay area
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
We made 404whp and 401 ft lbs of torque .. 100 octane unleaded, AEM EMS setup and alot of boost ..

Pump gas 23 psi ...the car made back to back 385 whp ... The aem frees up about 30 extra whp from any other piggy back / flash / afc out there. .. The guy went consistant 11.7 on 94 octane, stock intercooler as well...
at stock turbo boost levels, what's an aem doing that can't be emulated with a reflash or piggyback? [i am ignorant]

Last edited by ez76; Jun 1, 2004 at 04:59 PM.
Old Jun 1, 2004, 05:58 PM
  #17  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
 
TurbotrixRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ez76
at stock turbo boost levels, what's an aem doing that can't be emulated with a reflash or piggyback? [i am ignorant]

Converting the car to speed density ..and losing the mass air sensor is huge gains ..


Mark
Turbotrix
Old Jun 1, 2004, 06:12 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
4ringturncoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.buschurracing.com/EVO_Stage4.html This will help with how much power you can get from the stock turbo.
Old Jun 1, 2004, 08:42 PM
  #19  
Evolving Member
 
SSKILLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U.S.M.C.
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey turbo how would u recomend doing this.....i know you can go the aem ems route but i also heard ultimate came out with a blow through sensor but im not too sure about that....wha do u think
Old Jun 2, 2004, 04:54 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
We made 404whp and 401 ft lbs of torque .. 100 octane unleaded, AEM EMS setup and alot of boost ..

Pump gas 23 psi ...the car made back to back 385 whp ... The aem frees up about 30 extra whp from any other piggy back / flash / afc out there. .. The guy went consistant 11.7 on 94 octane, stock intercooler as well...

mark
turbotrix racing
Very nice figures. what mods did you have? what boost where you running for the 400lbs ft run? stock turbo or modded (ie bb conversion)? how did the turbo hold up (i hear of bent shafts when really high boodt is ran)?

thanks Chris.
Old Jun 2, 2004, 07:10 AM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
We didn't wing the hell out of the stock turbo and try to get it to produce 28 psi of boost on a spike or anything. We did manage 390 whp and 390 ft lbs of torque with the AEM EMS in the car and the stock turbo, head, shortblock.

We have gone 11.65 at 117.88 mph on the stock turbo though, so 11's on the stock turbo is DEFINETELY do-able.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Old Jun 2, 2004, 03:28 PM
  #22  
Newbie
 
MPZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Converting the car to speed density ..and losing the mass air sensor is huge gains ..


Mark
Turbotrix
Makes me second guess the route I went with the Utec. Very friendly to tune but cant convert to speed density have to deal with the restrictive MAS. Hoping to switch out to the UR , wait to see other peoples results.

But I still love the Utec.

Anyway awesome numbers on the stock turbo
One hell of a tune, congrats.
Old Jun 2, 2004, 04:26 PM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (92)
 
fimotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,590
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
11's on stock turbo is easy. Just get Cams, turbo back exhaust, fuel pump, injectors, preferrably a fmic and either flash or ems. I did it on a basic mail in dynoflash and stock clutch.

Dan
Old Jun 3, 2004, 05:37 AM
  #24  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
 
TurbotrixRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ron achieved ... 11.7 on with the ems on the stock turbo and pump gas. Stock intercooler. He had cams, turbo back exhaust, pipe kit and boost controler with air filter .. Ohh and injectors..660cc ..which btw were maxed out at 400 hp ..

Mark
Turbotrix
Old Jun 3, 2004, 05:56 AM
  #25  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
I have to agree.. its definitely possible.. But like everyone has said in the past few messages the key to making those numbers is reducing as many of the restrictions in the intake and exhaust path as possible.. At what point does it become impractical due to the costs of upgrading components over just bolting up a new turbo kit will be your own judgement though. I realize that people love the speed density conversion, but the blowthrough MAF upgrade is also an option, though not cheap. As far as I can tell so far, if you want to get 400+ whp, you need to address inherant restrictions in the system.. upgraded cams, upgraded exhaust, upgraded intercooler and piping, reducing restrictions introduced by the MAF sensor, throttle body, intake manifold and head.. The real problem is that the cost of an upgraded head, throttle body, and MAF upgrade, end up costing nearly as much as a turbo kit and AEM setup.

HOWEVER, the one advantage of stock (or stock design) turbos, and retaining it is drivability, and fun factor on the street..
Old Jun 3, 2004, 06:07 AM
  #26  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
whitet777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kohler, WI
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what's the secret to getting the stock turbo to spool by 2800RPM?


Originally Posted by 4G63>OOOO
With some money spent, you can make the stock turbo spool (24psi) by 2800rpm. I think it will max out at about 380-390whp and that's almost killing the damn thing.

Trust me, with an optimized stock turbo setup, you'll have your hands full.
Old Jun 3, 2004, 06:59 AM
  #27  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MPZ06
350 is about the upper limits of the stocker...............

I want to see the time slips of 11 second runs on stock turbo, no Nos.................
I don't see why an 11 second run on a 9.8cm^2 twin-scroll 16G is such a big deal. People have been doing it for years with 7cm^2 single-scroll 16Gs on DSMs.

I ran an 11.98 and an 11.95@116mph a few weeks back with an Evo III 16G on my 1997 Eclipse GSX (3150lbs without me in it) at 24psi. I ran 118mph last year with the same turbo at 25 to 26psi, but the spike I was getting was over 30psi, so I haven't tried it again. I think I have sorted out the spike, now, though.

Last edited by ShapeGSX; Jun 3, 2004 at 07:04 AM.
Old Jun 3, 2004, 07:08 AM
  #28  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I have to agree.. its definitely possible.. But like everyone has said in the past few messages the key to making those numbers is reducing as many of the restrictions in the intake and exhaust path as possible.. At what point does it become impractical due to the costs of upgrading components over just bolting up a new turbo kit will be your own judgement though.
All of those components will also benefit the larger turbo. Even moreso, actually.

Personally, I don't think that a GM hotwire MAF gives much (if any) restriction at all. So it is a toss-up between it and speed density.

But then again, I'm still running a bone stock 2G DSM MAF.
Old Jun 3, 2004, 07:10 AM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tri-State
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShapeGSX
I don't see why an 11 second run on a 9.8cm^2 twin-scroll 16G is such a big deal. People have been doing it for years with 7cm^2 single-scroll 16Gs on DSMs.

I ran an 11.98 and an 11.95@116mph a few weeks back with an Evo III 16G on my 1997 Eclipse GSX (3150lbs without me in it) at 24psi. I ran 118mph last year with the same turbo at 25 to 26psi, but the spike I was getting was over 30psi, so I haven't tried it again. I think I have sorted out the spike, now, though.

Evo is like 3350lb with driver so you have a 200lb advantage. Some people are runing 11.8@116 or better with the stock turbo. .
Old Jun 3, 2004, 07:21 AM
  #30  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Evo is like 3350lb with driver so you have a 200lb advantage. Some people are runing 11.8@116 or better with the stock turbo. .
Go back and read what I said. 3150lbs WITHOUT me in it. With me in the car, the total package weighs 3315lbs. At least it says that on New England Dragway's scales. Personally, I think they read a little light.


Quick Reply: What is the potential of the EVO stock turbo?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 PM.